Historic Conviction: Donald Trump Found Guilty of 34 Felonies in New York Case

New York, New York, USA United States of America
Donald J. Trump was found guilty of 34 felonies on May 30, 2024
Michael Cohen, Trump's former personal attorney, testified in the trial
The charges stemmed from hush money payments made during his presidential campaign in 2016 to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal
The conviction sets a precedent for holding elected officials accountable for their actions but also has implications weakening the presidency
Trump's legal team argued the payments were lawful and not a violation of campaign finance laws
Historic Conviction: Donald Trump Found Guilty of 34 Felonies in New York Case

Title: A Historic Moment in American Politics: The First Conviction of a Former President

Lead: The historic conviction of Donald J. Trump, the first former president to face criminal charges, has sent shockwaves through the political landscape. In this article, we will explore the facts surrounding his case and its implications for American democracy.

Paragraph 1: On May 30, 2024, a Manhattan jury found Donald J. Trump guilty of 34 felonies related to falsifying business records in connection with hush money payments made during his presidential campaign in 2016. This marked the first time a former U.S. president had been convicted of a crime while out of office.

Paragraph 2: The charges against Trump stemmed from an investigation that began in Manhattan in 2018, focusing on payments made to adult film star Stormy Daniels and Playboy model Karen McDougal to silence allegations of extramarital affairs. The former president's legal team argued that the payments were lawful and not a violation of campaign finance laws.

Paragraph 3: The trial, which took place in late March and early April 2024, featured testimony from key witnesses such as Michael Cohen, Trump's former personal attorney who facilitated the payments. The jury deliberated for just five hours before reaching its verdict.

Background Information: The Manhattan District Attorney's Office brought the case against Trump under New York state law, which does not grant presidential immunity for state crimes. The former president faces up to four years in prison or as little as probation after being convicted of falsifying business records.

Paragraph 4: Trump's conviction has significant implications for American democracy and the role of the presidency. Critics argue that it sets a dangerous precedent, potentially weakening the office and making future presidents more vulnerable to political attacks. Supporters, however, view it as an important step towards holding elected officials accountable for their actions.

Paragraph 5: The case against Trump is not the only legal challenge he faces. He also has ongoing criminal investigations in Georgia and Washington, D.C., related to efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Bias: It's important to note that sources may have biases that could influence their reporting on this story. For instance, some media outlets may be more critical or sympathetic towards Trump based on their political leanings. It is essential to consider multiple sources and perspectives when forming an opinion.

Conclusion: The conviction of Donald J. Trump marks a historic moment in American politics, with far-reaching implications for the presidency and democracy as a whole. As the legal proceedings continue, it remains crucial to stay informed about this developing story while being mindful of potential biases in reporting.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

96%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

A Mark of Shame for 900 Years. Until Now?

The Name Of The NZ Prefix. I PWA NZI.P.Was Dropped. Mattathias Schwartz Saturday, 06 July 2024 09:03
  • Unique Points
    • Donald J. Trump was found guilty of 34 felonies in May, 2024.
    • A felony is defined as any crime punishable by a year or more in prison.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

88%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Experts doubt Trump will get conviction tossed in "hush money" case despite Supreme Court ruling

CBS News Site: https://www.cbsnews.com/articles/about-us/ Graham Kates Saturday, 06 July 2024 13:13
  • Unique Points
    • Donald Trump is the first former president to be convicted of a crime.
    • An investigation into Donald Trump began in Manhattan in 2018.
    • Trump’s team requested permission to file a motion to throw out the conviction based on this ruling.
    • Judge Juan Merchan granted the request and postponed Trump’s sentencing from July 11 to Sept. 18.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (50%)
    The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the author's position. The author quotes experts who express skepticism about Trump's ability to overturn his conviction, but does not provide any counter-arguments or perspectives from those who believe Trump may have a chance. Additionally, the article uses emotional manipulation by describing the Supreme Court decision as a 'curveball' and 'breaking ball', implying surprise and confusion when in fact it was an expected ruling based on legal precedent.
    • If he engaged in unlawful conduct before he became president, it doesn’t seem to me that his efforts when he was president, to either cover up or address that conduct, will be immunized from criminal liability.
    • Much of that evidence pertained to what prosecutors described as a 2018 ‘pressure campaign’ designed to keep Cohen from divulging incriminating information about Trump.
    • The latest is Monday’s landmark Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity that led to Tuesday’s decision by the judge in his New York criminal case to postpone Trump’s sentencing.
  • Fallacies (95%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it quotes experts' opinions on the likelihood of Trump's conviction being overturned. However, no explicit dichotomous depictions or inflammatory rhetoric were found.
    • ] Experts remain skeptical that Trump[apos]s 11th-hour effort to overturn his conviction will be successful.[/
    • If he engaged in unlawful conduct before he became president, it doesn[apos]t seem to me that his efforts when he was president, to either cover up or address that conduct, will be immunized from criminal liability.[
  • Bias (95%)
    The author does not demonstrate any clear bias in the article. However, there is a disproportionate number of quotes from experts expressing skepticism about Trump's ability to overturn his conviction. This could be seen as an attempt to sway the reader towards a particular perspective, but it does not rise to the level of bias that would significantly impact the objectivity of the article.
    • "I do not believe that the verdict will be set aside."
      • "If he engaged in unlawful conduct before he became president, it doesn't seem to me that his efforts when he was president, to either cover up or address that conduct, will be immunized from criminal liability."
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      100%

      The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
      (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

      A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

      Ben Wittes and Steven Shepard: He Is Still a Criminal

      The Bulwark LLC Tim Miller, Saturday, 06 July 2024 13:14
      • Unique Points
        • The Supreme Court has pretended that the term 'high crimes and misdemeanors' is not explicitly in the Constitution.
        • Donald Trump is a disqualified law-breaker.
        • The Founding Fathers warned about individuals like Donald Trump becoming president.
        • Character is currently the only real check on presidential power.
      • Accuracy
        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      85%

      The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
      (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

      A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

      Count the reasons to vote against Trump

      Polkio.com Thursday, 04 July 2024 00:00
      • Unique Points
        • The Polk County Itemizer Observer offers online and print subscriptions.
        • Online subscriptions cost $9 per month or $75 for a year.
        • Print subscriptions include delivery of the newspaper and online access for $10 per month or $90 for a year.
        • Existing print subscribers can access online content for free.
      • Accuracy
        • Donald J. Trump was found guilty of 34 felonies in May, 2024.
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      92%

      The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
      (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

      A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

      Judge in Trump Hush-Money Case Delays Sentencing After Immunity Claim

      The Name Of The NZ Prefix. I PWA NZI.P.Was Dropped. Ben Protess, Tuesday, 02 July 2024 15:05
      • Unique Points
        • Judge Juan M. Merchan delayed Donald J. Trump’s sentencing in his Manhattan criminal case until September 18 to consider if a new Supreme Court ruling might affect Trump’s conviction.
        • Donald J. Trump was scheduled for sentencing on July 11, but the planned sentencing hit a snag due to the Supreme Court granting him broad immunity from prosecution for official actions taken as president.
        • Trump faces up to four years in prison or as little as probation after being convicted of falsifying business records related to his cover-up of a sex scandal during his 2016 presidential campaign.
        • The judge may ultimately find no basis to overturn the jury’s verdict, but the delay was a surprising turn of events in the case.
        • Trump’s other cases are mired in delay and this sentencing might be the only moment of criminal accountability for him before the election.
      • Accuracy
        • ]The Supreme Court ruled that former presidents have broad immunity for official acts, which could affect evidence used against Trump in his New York criminal case.[/1]
        • [Trump faces up to four years in prison or as little as probation after being convicted of falsifying business records related to his cover-up of a sex scandal during his 2016 presidential campaign.]
        • [Donald J. Trump was found guilty of 34 felonies in May, 2024.]
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (95%)
        The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states that the Supreme Court ruling 'deals a major blow to Trump's federal criminal case in Washington.' While the ruling may have implications for that case, it does not directly overturn or affect Trump's conviction in the Manhattan case. The author is making an assumption based on the authority of the Supreme Court decision, which may not hold true.
        • The Supreme Court ruling 'deals a major blow to Trump's federal criminal case in Washington.'
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication