Mattathias Schwartz
Mattathias Schwartz is a reporter for The New York Times, covering the federal judiciary and legal affairs. He has written extensively on issues related to the Supreme Court, voting rights, and gun violence. Prior to joining The Times, he was a reporter at The Wall Street Journal and The Associated Press. Schwartz has also contributed to publications such as The Atlantic and Slate. His work focuses on uncovering the primary topics of the articles he has written while also considering any past biases, logical fallacies, deception or conflicts of interests.
82%
The Daily's Verdict
This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.
Bias
86%
Examples:
- A Virginia grand jury found that the administrator had not acted on reports from staff members that the 6-year-old had brought a firearm to Richneck Elementary. Despite having been told that same day that the student was 'in a violent mood,' and having received several reports that he was carrying a firearm, the assistant principal turned down a school counselor's request for permission to search the student.
- The author quotes one of the shooter's friends who said they tried to keep Ms. Zwerner safe, implying that she knew about the gun and could have prevented the shooting if she had acted on this information.
- The author uses sensationalism when describing the shooting as a 'shocking' series of lapses which implies that it was an unusual occurrence when in fact school shootings are not uncommon.
Conflicts of Interest
75%
Examples:
- The author provides information about a case involving forum shopping but does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest related to the topic.
Contradictions
100%
Examples:
- The author states that 'plaintiffs have tried to cherry-pick judges' which implies they are doing something wrong. However, this is not necessarily the case and forum shopping can be seen as a way for plaintiffs to ensure their case is heard by an impartial judge.
- The author uses sensationalism when he describes Judge Kacsmaryk's ruling as invalidating the FDA's 23-year-old approval of mifepristone. This is not accurate and misrepresents the facts.
Deceptions
88%
Examples:
- The article states that 'plaintiffs have tried to cherry-pick judges' which implies they are doing something wrong. However, this is not necessarily the case and forum shopping can be seen as a way for plaintiffs to ensure their case is heard by an impartial judge.
- The author uses sensationalism when he describes Judge Kacsmaryk's ruling as invalidating the FDA's 23-year-old approval of mifepristone. This is not accurate and misrepresents the facts.
Recent Articles
Judge Joshua Kindred Resigns Amid Sexual Harassment Allegations: A Look into the Unclear Reasons Behind His Departure from the U.S. District Court for Alaska
Broke On: Wednesday, 03 July 2024Trump-appointed Judge Joshua Kindred of the U.S. District Court for Alaska resigned on July 8, 2024, following allegations of sexual harassment and creating a hostile work environment. The investigation by the Judicial Council confirmed these findings, but Kindred initially denied the accusations before later admitting to lying under oath. Historic Conviction: Donald Trump Found Guilty of 34 Felonies in New York Case
Broke On: Saturday, 06 July 2024Former President Trump convicted of 34 felonies, marking the first time a U.S. president faces criminal charges post-office; implications for American democracy and future presidencies. Special Grand Jury Report Finds Security, Administrative Fails in Abby Zwerner Shooting at Richneck Elementary School
Broke On: Thursday, 11 April 2024A special grand jury report revealed security and administrative failures that led to the shooting of a teacher by her student at Richneck Elementary School in Virginia. The report also exposed poor judgment by school officials, including an assistant principal who denied a counselor's request to search the student despite warnings about his firearm and violent behavior. The gun jammed after one shot, allowing the teacher to survive. The report recommended criminal charges for the assistant principal and raised questions about missing disciplinary records and lack of appropriate interventions for the troubled student. New Policy to Restrict Judge Shopping in Federal Courts Ensures Impartiality and Prevents Bias
Broke On: Wednesday, 13 March 2024Federal courts have implemented a new policy to restrict judge shopping and ensure impartiality in judicial decisions by randomly assigning judges for civil suits that affect an entire state or country.