Mattathias Schwartz
Mattathias Schwartz is a journalist who works for The New York Times. He covers topics such as politics, immigration, abortion rights, and judicial issues. His work has been featured in various publications and he has received recognition for his reporting.
64%
The Daily's Verdict
This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.
Bias
85%
Examples:
- The author seems to have a bias towards certain topics such as immigration, abortion, and donor-diplomats.
- The author tends to present the Republican side of the issues and criticizes Democratic policies. He also uses sensationalism and exaggeration in some cases.
Conflicts of Interest
50%
Examples:
- The author has a potential conflict of interest as he is an employee of The New York Times which may have its own political agenda.
- There are no clear conflicts of interest found in the articles provided
Contradictions
100%
Examples:
- There are no contradictions found in the articles provided
Deceptions
50%
Examples:
- The author uses deceptive practices such as sensationalism and exaggeration to make his points more appealing.
Recent Articles
Special Grand Jury Report Finds Security, Administrative Fails in Abby Zwerner Shooting at Richneck Elementary School
Broke On: Thursday, 11 April 2024A special grand jury report revealed security and administrative failures that led to the shooting of a teacher by her student at Richneck Elementary School in Virginia. The report also exposed poor judgment by school officials, including an assistant principal who denied a counselor's request to search the student despite warnings about his firearm and violent behavior. The gun jammed after one shot, allowing the teacher to survive. The report recommended criminal charges for the assistant principal and raised questions about missing disciplinary records and lack of appropriate interventions for the troubled student. New Policy to Restrict Judge Shopping in Federal Courts Ensures Impartiality and Prevents Bias
Broke On: Wednesday, 13 March 2024Federal courts have implemented a new policy to restrict judge shopping and ensure impartiality in judicial decisions by randomly assigning judges for civil suits that affect an entire state or country.