Ecuador's Surge in Violence: Drug Gangs and Terrorist Designations

Drug gangs are the main culprit of this increase in violence
Ecuador is currently experiencing a surge in violence
On January 9th, armed men invaded a television station and threatened employees of TC Televisión network. This incident led to President Daniel Noboa declaring his country to be in an internal armed conflict after which he designated 20 drug-trafficking gangs as terrorist groups that can be neutralized within the bounds of international humanitarian law.
The government has also been dealing with a wave of riots across the country, sparked by Adolfo Macias' escape from prison on January 7th and his subsequent attack at Guayaquil University where he exchanged fire with police.
Ecuador's Surge in Violence: Drug Gangs and Terrorist Designations

Ecuador is currently experiencing a surge in violence, with drug gangs being the main culprit. On January 9th, armed men invaded a television station and threatened employees of TC TelevisiĆ³n network. This incident led to President Daniel Noboa declaring his country to be in an internal armed conflict after which he designated 20 drug-trafficking gangs as terrorist groups that can be neutralized within the bounds of international humanitarian law. The government has also been dealing with a wave of riots across the country, sparked by Adolfo Macias' escape from prison on January 7th and his subsequent attack at Guayaquil University where he exchanged fire with police. This violence is causing widespread fear among Ecuadorians as well as concern for their safety.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It's not clear if the government has taken any concrete actions to address the root causes of this surge in violence.

Sources

88%

  • Unique Points
    • On Wednesday, January 9th, 2024, armed men invaded a television station in Guayaquil and threatened the employees of TC Televisión network. The president of Ecuador declared his country to be in an internal armed conflict after this incident.
    • The government has designated 20 drug-trafficking gangs as terrorist groups that can be neutralized within the bounds of international humanitarian law.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (80%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that President Daniel Noboa has designated 20 drug-trafficking gangs as terrorist groups and authorized military forces to neutralize them within the bounds of international humanitarian law. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence or official documentation provided in the article.
    • The motive for targeting the station remained unclear. The words sounded like a warning addressed to Ecuadorian authorities and the nation at large.
    • The author claims that President Daniel Noboa has designated 20 drug-trafficking gangs as terrorist groups and authorized military forces to neutralize them within the bounds of international humanitarian law. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence or official documentation provided in the article.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the president's statement and actions as evidence for their claims. They also use inflammatory rhetoric when describing the violence in Ecuador as a 'state of war'. Additionally, there are instances where the author presents only one side of a story without providing any counterarguments or alternative perspectives.
    • The president's statement and actions are used to support the author's claims
    • Inflammatory rhetoric is used to describe the violence in Ecuador as a 'state of war'
    • Only one side of a story is presented without providing any counterarguments or alternative perspectives
  • Bias (85%)
    The article is biased towards the government's response to the drug gangs in Ecuador. The author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes these groups as terrorists rather than criminals. They also use quotes from President Daniel Noboa that are highly inflammatory, such as calling those who collaborate with drug trafficking groups 'terrorist networks'. Additionally, the article portrays the government's response to this issue in a positive light by highlighting their efforts to crack down on these gangs and consolidate peace. This is done without providing any evidence of success or effectiveness of these measures.
    • The author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes drug gangs as terrorists rather than criminals.
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication

    84%

    • Unique Points
      • Ecuador became Latin America's deadliest country in 2023
      • Adolfo Macias escaped from prison on January 7th and sparked a wave of riots across the country
      • Gangsters took hostages at Guayaquil University on January 9th and exchanged fire with police
    • Accuracy
      No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
    • Deception (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Fallacies (85%)
      The article contains several examples of logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Ecuador was once one of the safest countries in Latin America and citing a source without providing any context or evidence for this claim. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma by suggesting that there are only two options: either Ecuador is safe or it is not. This oversimplifies complex issues and ignores other factors that may be contributing to crime rates in the country. The article also contains an example of inflammatory rhetoric when describing the violence as
      • The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Ecuador was once one of the safest countries in Latin America and citing a source without providing any context or evidence for this claim.
      • The article contains an example of inflammatory rhetoric when describing the violence as 'mayhem'.
    • Bias (85%)
      The article is biased towards the negative portrayal of Ecuador and its drug gangs. The author uses sensationalist language such as 'thuggery', 'mayhem' and 'deadliest in mainland Latin America' to create a sense of urgency and danger. They also use examples that are meant to shock the reader, such as the TV station raid, without providing any context or explanation for why it is significant. The author also uses quotes from sources who have an agenda against Ecuador and its drug gangs, which further reinforces their negative portrayal of the country.
      • On January 9th another armed group raided Guayaquil University, taking students hostage and exchanging fire with the police.
        • The events were set in motion on January 7th, when guards at La Regional prison in Guayaquil discovered that Adolfo Macu00EDas, boss of the drug gang Los Choneros, was not in his cell. He had been serving a 34-year sentence for murder and drug-trafficking.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          The author of the article has a conflict of interest on several topics related to Ecuador. The Economist is known for its coverage of Latin America and may have financial ties or professional affiliations with organizations that are involved in issues related to drug gangs, prisons, violence, corruption and homicide rate.
          • The article mentions Adolfo Macias who was a former president of Ecuador. The author does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest they may have had with him.

          70%

          • Unique Points
            • Armed men interrupt live broadcast and threaten presenter
            • Bombs were detonated across Ecuador on Tuesday
            • More than 130 prison staff are being held hostage by inmates in five jails
            • A notorious gangster vanished from his prison cell
          • Accuracy
            • Esteban Torres Cobo, a vice minister in President Noboa's government, said the war on armed gangs could result in many deaths and casualties
          • Deception (50%)
            The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the attack on the TV studio was related to Fito's disappearance but does not provide any evidence or quotes from authorities to support this claim. Secondly, it reports that President Noboa declared a state of emergency due to recent jail riots and escapes without mentioning anything about violence blamed by authorities on criminal gangs. Thirdly, the article states that Esteban Torres Cobo said the war on armed gangs could result in many deaths and casualties but does not provide any quotes from him or context for his statement. Finally, it reports that President Noboa ordered soldiers to be 'neutralised' without providing any information about what this means or how it relates to the violence in Ecuador.
            • The article reports that President Noboa declared a state of emergency due to recent jail riots and escapes without mentioning anything about violence blamed by authorities on criminal gangs. For example, 'A spokesperson for UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said he was alarmed by the deteriorating situation.'
            • The article states that the attack on the TV studio was related to Fito's disappearance but does not provide any evidence or quotes from authorities to support this claim. For example, 'Soldiers are on the streets in several cities in Ecuador as the country reels from an unprecedented day of violence.'
            • The article states that Esteban Torres Cobo said the war on armed gangs could result in many deaths and casualties but does not provide any quotes from him or context for his statement. For example, 'He told the BBC's Newshour programme: ȢIt't going to be bloody but this is the change we need in order to have a better future, we cannot be postponing this decision throughout the years, we have to take decision now./'
          • Fallacies (85%)
            The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing statements from various sources without providing any evidence or context for their claims. Additionally, the author commits a false dilemma by presenting only two options: either support President Noboa's plan to build a new high security prison for gang leaders or not do anything at all. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric when it describes the situation in Guayaquil as
            • The author uses an appeal to authority by citing statements from various sources without providing any evidence or context for their claims.
            • <p>President Noboa declared a state of emergency in response to a wave of recent jail riots and escapes from prisons and other acts of violence blamed by authorities on criminal gangs. He ordered that criminal gangs be <strong>neutralised</strong></p>
          • Bias (85%)
            The article contains examples of monetary bias and religious bias. The author uses the phrase 'neutralised' to describe the government's plan which implies that they are trying to eliminate criminal gangs completely, rather than just neutralizing them as stated in their official statement. Additionally, there is a clear emphasis on the role of religion in this conflict with references made to Catholicism and Christianity.
            • Eduardo said he was in the street buying coffee at the moment the chaos started to unfold and by the time he returned to the office, his colleagues had already started to pack up and leave.
              • The escape of Fito represents a huge blow to Mr Noboa's presidency
                • The president ordered that criminal gangs be "neutralised"
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                  The article by James Gregory and Will Grant for Guayaquil Watch reports on the recent violence in Ecuador. The authors have a clear conflict of interest with Adolfo MacEDas Villamar (Choneros gang leader) as they mention him multiple times throughout the article. Additionally, there is no disclosure of any financial ties or personal relationships between the authors and individuals or groups mentioned in the article.
                  • Adolfo MacEDas Villamar (Choneros gang leader)
                    • Fito (Choneros gang leader)
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of violence in Ecuador as they are reporting on recent jail riots and escapes from prisons. The article also mentions armed men holding hostages at public TV studios which could be seen as another example of violence.