Five Defendants Charged with Bribing Juror in $250 Million Federal Funds Embezzlement Case

Minneapolis, Minnesota United States of America
Ali offered cash and more if juror voted for acquittal of all defendants
Estimated that over $250 million in federal funds were diverted
Five defendants charged with bribing juror in $250 million federal funds embezzlement case
Ladan Mohamed Ali recruited to carry out scheme
Three of the defendants charged were among those convicted in the case
Five Defendants Charged with Bribing Juror in $250 Million Federal Funds Embezzlement Case

In a shocking turn of events, five individuals have been charged with conspiring to bribe a juror during the trial of seven defendants accused of embezzling federal funds meant for children's food programs during the Covid-19 pandemic. The attempted bribery took place on the eve of the final day of the weekslong trial, which has been ongoing since early 2024.

According to court documents, Ladan Mohamed Ali was recruited by Abdimajid Mohamed Nur to carry out the scheme. Ali was identified as the woman who dropped off a bag containing $120,000 in cash at the juror's home and offered more money if she voted for acquittal of all defendants. The group targeted the youngest and only person of color on the jury panel, believing her to be easily influenced.

Abdiaziz Shafii Farah drove Ali to the juror's house where she handed over the money, while Abdulkarim Shafii Farah stayed in the car and took a video of the interaction. The defendants had researched the juror's personal information, daily habits, and followed her home before installing a tracking device on her car.

The attempted bribery was reported by the juror who was subsequently removed from the case before deliberations began. Authorities believe that this incident highlights laxity in Covid-19 pandemic oversight and raises concerns about corruption within federal trials.

Three of the defendants charged with attempted bribery were among those convicted in the case, including Abdiaziz Shafii Farah and Abdimajid Mohamed Nur. The overall scheme is estimated to have diverted over $250 million in federal funds from their intended purpose.

The U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI are currently investigating this matter further, with more than 70 people charged in connection to the embezzlement of food aid for children.



Confidence

91%

Doubts
  • Was there any evidence that the attempted bribery actually influenced the juror's decision?
  • Were all seven defendants involved in the bribery scheme or just five?

Sources

99%

  • Unique Points
    • Five people have been indicted for bribing a juror during the Feeding Our Future fraud trial.
    • A juror was dismissed after reporting a woman dropped a bag of cash at her home and offered more money if she voted to acquit all defendants.
    • The five defendants targeted the youngest and only juror of color because they believed she was easily influenced.
    • Nur recruited Ali to carry out the scheme and provided her with $120,000 in cash.
    • Abdulkarim Farah drove Ali to the juror’s house where she handed over the money and promised more if she voted to acquit all defendants.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (95%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states that the Feeding Our Future fraud scheme is the 'largest pandemic fraud in the United States.' This statement is not a logical conclusion drawn by the author, but rather an assertion made by U.S. Attorney Andrew Luger. Additionally, there are several instances of inflammatory rhetoric used to describe the defendants and their actions, such as calling it a 'chilling attack on our justice system' and describing the conspirators as having 'sophistication and intentionality.' However, these statements do not detract significantly from the overall accuracy or logical soundness of the article.
    • ][U.S. Attorney Andrew Luger] called the bribery attempt a 'chilling attack on our justice system,'[[
    • The conspirators had also compiled a list of 'arguments to convince other jurors,' many of which were designed to convince the jurors that the prosecution was motivated by racism.[
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Five people have been charged with conspiring to bribe a Minnesota juror for $120,000 in exchange for an acquittal.
    • The accused researched the juror's personal information, surveilled her, and bought a GPS device to install on her car.
    • The defendants targeted the youngest and only person of color on the jury panel.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Five people have been charged with jury bribery in the Feeding Our Future trial: Abdiaziz Shafii Farah, Abdimajid Mohamed Nur, Said Shafii Farah, Abdulkarim Shafii Farah, and Ladan Mohamed Ali.
    • Abdiaziz Farah was additionally charged with obstruction of justice.
    • Juror 52 reported that a woman offered her $120,000 in cash to vote for acquittal and provided instructions on how to do so.
    • Ladan Ali recruited by Nur, was identified as the woman who dropped off the bribe money at Juror 52’s home.
    • The group researched Juror 52’s address and daily habits, followed her home, and bought a tracking device for her car.
    • Abdulkarim Farah stayed in the car and took a video of the interaction between Ali and Juror 52.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

98%

  • Unique Points
    • Five people were charged with conspiring to bribe a juror in a federal trial in Minneapolis.
    • The attempted bribe took place on the eve of the final day of a weekslong trial involving seven defendants.
    • Three defendants charged with attempted bribery were among those convicted, including Abdiaziz Shafii Farah and Abdimajid Mohamed Nur.
    • The juror was approached because she was the sole person of color on the jury and they sought to persuade her that the government did not respect or care about immigrants.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (95%)
    The article contains an appeal to prejudice fallacy in the statement 'They sought to persuade her that the government was motivated by animus toward immigrants.' This statement implies that the defendants had a valid reason for their actions based on their ethnicity, which is not a valid justification for attempting to bribe a juror.
    • ]They sought to persuade her that the government was motivated by animus toward immigrants[
    • ']You alone can end this case.['
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication