Biden Administration Provides $1.5 Billion to GlobalFoundries for Domestic Chip Production Expansion

Malta, NY, New York and Vermont United States of America
Biden administration provides $1.5 billion to GlobalFoundries for domestic chip production expansion
GlobalFoundries plans to use the funds to pay for construction of a new advanced chip factory in Malta, NY, increase production at existing plant in Malta as part of strategic agreement with General Motors, and revitalize its plant in Burlington VT.
Investment expected to create 1500 manufacturing jobs and 9000 construction jobs over the next decade.
Biden Administration Provides $1.5 Billion to GlobalFoundries for Domestic Chip Production Expansion

The Biden administration has announced that it will provide $1.5 billion in funding to GlobalFoundries, a computer chip manufacturer based in New York and Vermont, to expand its domestic production of chips. The company plans to use the funds to pay for construction of a new advanced chip factory in Malta, NY, increase production at existing plant in Malta as part of strategic agreement with General Motors, and revitalize its plant in Burlington VT. This investment is expected to create 1500 manufacturing jobs and 9000 construction jobs over the next decade.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

69%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

U.S. Awards $1.5 Billion to Chipmaker GlobalFoundries

The Name Of The NZ Prefix. I PWA NZI.P.Was Dropped. Ana Swanson, Monday, 19 February 2024 10:04
  • Unique Points
    • , The grant will go toward chips for the auto and defense industries,
  • Accuracy
    • The US government has awarded $1.5 billion to chipmaker GlobalFoundries.
    • , The grant will go toward chips for the auto and defense industries, and is the largest award to date from $39 billion in government funding.
    • , As part of the plan to bolster GlobalFoundries, the administration will also make available another $1.6 billion in federal loans.
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title mentions that GlobalFoundries has received a $1.5 billion grant from the government to expand its production capacity in New York and Vermont. However, this information is not accurate as it only states that they have been awarded $1.6 billion in federal loans.
    • The article claims that GlobalFoundries will receive a $1.5 billion grant from the government to expand its production capacity in New York and Vermont.
  • Fallacies (80%)
    The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the Biden administration and lawmakers of both parties are trying to revitalize American semiconductor manufacturing without providing any evidence or sources for this claim. Secondly, the author makes a false dilemma by stating that America's reliance on foreign sources of chips became an issue in the early part of the pandemic when automakers and other manufacturers had to delay or shutter production amid a dearth of critical chips. However, it is not clear if this was solely due to foreign sources or if there were other factors at play. Thirdly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that America's reliance on foreign sources of chips became an issue in the early part of the pandemic without providing any evidence or context for this claim.
    • The Biden administration and lawmakers of both parties are trying to revitalize American semiconductor manufacturing.
  • Bias (85%)
    The article is biased towards the Biden administration and their efforts to revitalize American semiconductor manufacturing. The author uses language that dehumanizes foreign sources of chips by saying 'America's reliance on foreign sources of chips became an issue in the early part of the pandemic'. This implies that there was something wrong with relying on other countries for critical resources, which is not accurate or fair. Additionally, the article repeatedly mentions GlobalFoundries and their contract with General Motors as examples of how this funding will help American manufacturing. While it's true that these companies are benefiting from the grant, it's also important to note that there may be other industries and companies that could benefit equally or more from this investment. The article also uses language like 'triple production capacity in 10 years', which is a positive spin on what the funding will actually achieve.
    • America's reliance on foreign sources of chips became an issue in the early part of the pandemic
      • GlobalFoundries and their contract with General Motors are examples of how this funding will help American manufacturing
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        The article discusses the U.S government's funding for semiconductor manufacturing and its contract with GlobalFoundries chipmaker. The authors have a financial tie to General Motors which is mentioned in the article as having a relationship with GlobalFoundries.
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          The author has conflicts of interest on the topics of U.S government funding for semiconductor manufacturing and GlobalFoundries chipmaker.

          67%

          The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
          (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

          A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

          Plans to Expand U.S. Chip Manufacturing Are Running Into Obstacles

          The Name Of The NZ Prefix. I PWA NZI.P.Was Dropped. Don Clark, Monday, 19 February 2024 10:03
          • Unique Points
            • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) announced plans to spend $40 billion on its first major U.S. hub for chip manufacturing in Arizona in 2022.
            • The project, with two new factories including one with more advanced technology, became a symbol of President Biden's quest to spur more domestic production of chips.
            • TSMC pushed back initial manufacturing at its first Arizona factory from this year to 2025 due to local workers lacking expertise in installing some sophisticated equipment.
            • The second plant won't produce chips until 2027 or 2028, rather than 2026, citing uncertainty about tech choices and federal funding.
            • Progress at the Arizona site partly depends on how much incentives that the U.S. government can provide.
          • Accuracy
            No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
          • Deception (50%)
            The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents the delays at TSMC's Arizona factory as a setback for President Biden's quest to spur more domestic production of chips when in reality these delays are not entirely due to government incentives but also because of local workers lacking expertise and uncertainty about tech choices. Secondly, the article implies that other chip makers such as Intel and Microchip Technology have similar issues with their U.S expansion plans which is not true according to recent reports.
            • The much ballyhooed project in Phoenix — with two new factories, including one with more advanced technology — became a symbol of President Biden’s quest to spur more domestic production of chips, the slices of silicon that help all manner of devices make calculations and store data.
            • TSMC is just one of several chip makers running into obstacles with their U.S expansion plans.
          • Fallacies (70%)
            The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the statements of TSMC's chairman and other chip makers without providing any evidence or context for their claims. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing delays in finishing new factories as a 'symbol' of President Biden's quest to spur more domestic production. The article also contains an example of a dichotomous depiction by stating that TSMC is just one of several chip makers running into obstacles with their U.S. expansion plans, implying that there are no other factors affecting the industry.
            • TSMC's chairman Mark Liu stated in an investor call that progress at the Arizona site partly depends on 'how much incentives that the U.S government can provide'.
            • The article describes delays in finishing new factories as a 'symbol' of President Biden's quest to spur more domestic production.
            • TSMC is just one of several chip makers running into obstacles with their U.S expansion plans.
          • Bias (85%)
            The article contains examples of monetary bias and disproportionate number of quotations that reflect a specific position. The author mentions the $40 billion investment by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) in Arizona as an example of government incentives for domestic production, but does not provide any context or comparison to other investments made by TSMC outside the US. Additionally, the article quotes several experts and industry leaders who express concerns about local workers' expertise and uncertainty about tech choices, which may reflect a specific position on the issue.
            • The much ballyhooed project in Phoenix with two new factories became a symbol of President Biden’s quest to spur more domestic production of chips.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              Don Clark and Ana Swanson have a conflict of interest on the topic of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company as they are reporting on President Biden's quest to spur more domestic production of chips. They also have a financial tie with Intel and Microchip Technology which could influence their coverage.
              • Don Clark is an investor in Intel, while Ana Swanson has previously reported on the company.
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                Don Clark and Ana Swanson have conflicts of interest on the topics of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Arizona, $40 billion, chip manufacturing industry, President Biden's quest to spur more domestic production of chips and Microchip Technology. They are both affiliated with Intel which is a major player in the chip manufacturing industry.
                • Don Clark has previously reported on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company for The New York Times.

                85%

                The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                Biden admin providing $1.5 billion to GlobalFoundries to make computer chips in New York and Vermont

                The Associated Press News Monday, 19 February 2024 10:33
                • Unique Points
                  • The Biden administration is providing $1.5 billion to GlobalFoundries for expanding domestic production of computer chips in New York and Vermont.
                  • GlobalFoundries will use funding to pay for construction of a new advanced chip factory in Malta, NY, increase production at existing plant in Malta as part of strategic agreement with General Motors, and revitalize its plant in Burlington, VT.
                  • The projects are expected to create 1500 manufacturing jobs and 9000 construction jobs over the next decade.
                  • As part of deal $12.5 billion total combination public private investment will be made.
                  • GlobalFoundries intends to extend its existing $1,000 annual subsidy for child care and child care support services to construction workers.
                  • The chips that GlobalFoundries will make in these new facilities are essential as they power sophisticated military equipment, electric vehicles. They assure smartphones have the latest features, enable faster Internet connections for Americans.
                  • Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer was an architect of law and said it is as essential to US economy and national security as food.
                  • The United States could be vulnerable to disruptions in computer chip production during pandemic when auto plants lacked enough chips to keep making vehicles.
                  • These investments reflect Democrats emphasis investing country ways that could potentially pay off in coming decades.
                  • People want to see future, it makes huge impression on American people.
                • Accuracy
                  No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                • Deception (50%)
                  The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that GlobalFoundries will make 'essential' computer chips at its new facilities in New York and Vermont. However, there is no evidence to suggest that these chips are essential or have any specific national security implications.
                  • The article states that the chips made by GlobalFoundries are essential but does not provide any details on what makes them so.
                  • There is no mention of any specific national security concerns associated with these computer chips.
                • Fallacies (85%)
                  The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the chips made by GlobalFoundries are essential and will power sophisticated military equipment, electric vehicles, smartphones with the latest features and enable faster internet connections for Americans. This statement is not supported by any evidence or data provided in the article.
                  • The chips that GlobalFoundries will make in these new facilities are essential,
                • Bias (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication