Don Clark,

Patrick Gelsinger is back running a company he first joined at 18. The chip maker was a Silicon Valley titan that lost its luster. As the world craves chips, the C.E.O. has faith he can fix it all. Don Clark Don Clark, who has covered the chip industry for more than 30 years, first interviewed Patrick Gelsinger in 1996. Feb. 17, 2022 Patrick Gelsinger was 18 years old and four months into an entry-level job at Intel when he heard a pivotal sermon at a Silicon Valley church in February 1980. There, a minister quoted Jesus from the Book of Revelation. I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other!” the minister said. “So, because you are lukewarm — neither hot nor cold — I am about to spit you out of my mouth.” The words jolted Mr. Gelsinger, reshaping his philosophy. He realized he had been a lukewarm believer, one who practiced his faith just once a week. He vowed never to be neither hot nor cold again. Now, at age 60, Mr. Gelsinger is hot about one thing in particular: Revitalizing Intel, a Silicon Valley icon that lost its leading position in chip manufacturing. The 120,000-person company was a household name in the 1990s, celebrated as a fount of innovation as its microprocessors became the electronic brains in the vast majority of computers. But Intel failed to place its chips into smartphones, which became the device of choice for most people. Apple and Google instead grew into the trillion-dollar emblems of Silicon Valley. Rejuvenating Intel is partly about Mr. Gelsinger's own ambitions. As a young engineer, he once wrote down a goal of leading Intel one day. But in 2009, after spending his entire career at the company, he was forced out. A year ago, he was wooed back for a surprise second chance. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. Already a subscriber? Log in. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

42%

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a poor reputation for journalistic standards and is not considered a reliable news source.

Bias

50%

Examples:

  • The article implies that President Biden's project in Phoenix is a symbol of his quest to spur more domestic production of chips, without providing any evidence or context for this claim.

Conflicts of Interest

30%

Examples:

  • The article does not mention any conflicts of interest or financial ties between the author or the company he works for and any chip makers or other entities involved in the industry.

Contradictions

100%

Examples:

  • The article states that TSMC is one of several chip makers running into obstacles with their U.S expansion plans, while also implying that Intel's comeback is possible and likely.

Deceptions

40%

Examples:

  • The article uses vague terms like 'craves' and 'revitalizing' to describe the demand and potential of chips, without providing any data or sources to support these claims.

Recent Articles

Biden Administration Provides $1.5 Billion to GlobalFoundries for Domestic Chip Production Expansion

Biden Administration Provides $1.5 Billion to GlobalFoundries for Domestic Chip Production Expansion

Broke On: Monday, 19 February 2024 The Biden administration has announced $1.5 billion in funding for GlobalFoundries to expand domestic production of computer chips, creating 2400 jobs over the next decade.