Google has added real-time protection to its Chrome browser.
The new feature will allow the browser to check URLs in real time and provide users with a more secure browsing experience.
Google has announced that it is adding real-time protection to its Chrome browser. The new feature will allow the browser to check URLs in real time and provide users with a more secure browsing experience. Google claims that this new feature will help protect against phishing attempts, malware, and other forms of online threats.
, Google found that real-time checks offered significant value, so it's bringing them to the standard version of Safe Browsing.
Google is keeping privacy in mind as Safe Browsing doesn't share the URLs of sites you visit with the company.
Accuracy
Google is upgrading the default Safe Browsing mode in Chrome to offer better protection against malicious websites.
, The new feature will help block 25 percent more phishing attempts.
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Safe Browsing mode on Google Chrome has been upgraded to offer better protection against malicious websites. However, this statement is misleading because it implies that there was a problem with the previous version of Safe Browsing which wasn't effective enough. In reality, Google simply decided to add an additional layer of protection by using real-time URL checks in addition to its existing locally stored list.
The author claims that Safe Browsing mode on Google Chrome has been upgraded to offer better protection against malicious websites. However, this statement is misleading because it implies that there was a problem with the previous version of Safe Browsing which wasn't effective enough.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority when stating that Safe Browsing is used on more than 5 billion devices and helps protect against phishing, malware and unwanted software. This statement implies that the information provided by Google should be trusted without question, which is not always true. Additionally, the article contains a dichotomous depiction of Safe Browsing's effectiveness in blocking phishing attempts before and after implementing real-time URL checks. The author states that real-time URL checks will help block 25% more phishing attempts, but this claim is not supported by any evidence presented in the article. Furthermore, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when stating that newly created sites and those that mask their true behavior may not be picked up on by Safe Browsing's detection systems right away. This statement implies a sense of urgency and danger, which is not always accurate.
Google says it’s upgrading the default Safe Browsing mode in Chrome to offer better protection against malicious websites.
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Safe Browsing as they are reporting for Engadget which is owned by Google. The article mentions that Chrome's Safe Browsing mode now offers better protection against bad sites and this could be seen as an attempt to promote the use of Chrome over other browsers.
The author reports on a new feature in Chrome's Safe Browsing mode, which is owned by Google. This suggests that the author may have a financial interest in promoting the use of Chrome.
Google has added real-time browsing protection to Chrome that it claims should protect your privacy.
The new version of Safe Browsing solves this problem with an API that hides the URLs of visited sites from Google.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The author of the article is Sheena Vasani and she has a history of being biased towards Google. The title itself suggests that Chrome can now protect users better while preserving their privacy which implies that there was previously an issue with protecting user's privacy. This statement could be seen as misleading because it implies that Chrome did not have any protection for user's privacy before, but in reality, the Safe Browsing feature has been automatically adding potentially unsafe URLs to a list Google stores on your device and checking them against this list every 30 to 60 minutes. The author also mentions that users must provide Google with more security-related data for full protection which could be seen as an attempt to justify the collection of user's personal information.
Google claims the new version of Safe Browsing solves this problem with an API that hides the URLs of visited sites from Google
Google has added real-time browsing protection to Chrome
Safe Browsing Enhanced protection mode deals with this by using Google Safe Browsing server-side database, which catches unsafe URLs much faster in real time.
Safe Browsing should then be able to decrypt the URL to its full hash form — which still hides the URL — and check it against its list.
The Enhanced version continues to offer greater protection.
The problem is that Google only updates this locally stored database every 30 to 60 minutes
Google is upgrading password security for iPhone users.
The improvements come by way of an update to Password Checkup, which already had the ability to flag compromised and reused passwords.
Accuracy
Google is adding two more functions to Password Checkup: an alert for weak passwords and another for reused ones.
The new feature will help block 25 percent more phishing attempts.
Google Safe Browsing server returns hashes that match its database of unsafe site hashes and shows a warning to the Chrome user if necessary.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that Google has upgraded password security for iPhone users when in fact it only added two new features to an existing feature called Password Checkup. Secondly, the author claims that Apple and Google are competitors when it comes to most things but thankfully they share an interest in securing data for their respective users. However, this is not true as Apple has its own security measures in place such as Face ID and Touch ID which compete with Google's biometric authentication system called Titan M. Lastly, the author states that Password Checkup will display an alert in Chrome whenever it detects a problem with any passwords entered but fails to mention that this feature can also be used independently.
The author states that Password Checkup will display an alert in Chrome whenever it detects a problem with any passwords entered but fails to mention that this feature can also be used independently.
The title implies that Google has upgraded password security for iPhone users when in fact it only added two new features to an existing feature called Password Checkup.
The author claims that Apple and Google are competitors when it comes to most things but thankfully they share an interest in securing data for their respective users. However, this is not true as Apple has its own security measures in place such as Face ID and Touch ID which compete with Google's biometric authentication system called Titan M.
Fallacies
(85%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The author has a clear bias towards Google and its security measures. The article is written in a positive tone about the new password security features for iPhone users, with no mention of any potential drawbacks or limitations. Additionally, the author uses language that dehumanizes Apple as a competitor to Google when it comes to securing data.
Google has just upgraded your security protection
Google is introducing new password protections on Chrome for iOS as another way to help you safely navigate the web.
The improvements come by way of an update to Password Checkup
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of password security as they are promoting Google's Password Checkup feature. The article also mentions Jasika Bawa and Jonathan Li who may have financial ties to Google or other companies mentioned in the article.
Google is updating its Chrome browser with a new password security feature called 'Password Checker'.
The author promotes Password Checkup as an effective way for iPhone users to improve their password security.
Google has enhanced its Safe Browsing service to enable real-time protection in Chrome for desktop, iOS, and soon Android against risky websites without sending browsing history data to the ad biz.
The Standard version of Safe Browsing will support real-time data lookup but won't send browsing history data back to Google.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(85%)
The article discusses Google's update to its Safe Browsing service. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the names of several individuals from Google who are quoted in a blog post about the update. Additionally, there is an inflammatory statement made when it says that privacy-preserving protocols are now table stakes due to privacy regulations in Europe and elsewhere.
Google has enhanced its Safe Browsing service to enable real-time protection in Chrome for desktop, iOS, and soon Android against risky websites.
Bias
(85%)
The article discusses Google's update to its Safe Browsing service which now offers real-time protection against risky websites without sending browsing history data to the ad giant. The author mentions that privacy rules in Europe and elsewhere have made it necessary for companies like Google to implement privacy-preserving protocols, such as using Oblivious HTTP (OHTTP) privacy server operated by Fastly which removes any potential user identifiers from the data sent between Chrome and Safe Browsing. The author also mentions that this update is a response to the fact that many unsafe sites exist for less than 10 minutes, meaning that by the time the locally stored list of known unsafe sites is updated, many have slipped through and had the chance to do damage if users happened to visit them during this window of opportunity. The author also mentions that Google claims it only uses data from Safe Browsing for security purposes.
Google has enhanced its Safe Browsing service to enable real-time protection in Chrome for desktop, iOS, and soon Android against risky websites
Thanks to privacy rules in Europe and elsewhere, privacy-preserving protocols are now table stakes
The Enhanced version of Safe Browsing has offered more extensive protection using real-time URL lookups and machine learning
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Google has a financial stake in the ad giant industry and may have conflicts of interest when reporting on topics related to online advertising. The article also mentions Google's Safe Browsing service which is used for security purposes but it is not clear if there are any other uses for this feature.
Google has a financial stake in the ad giant industry and may have conflicts of interest when reporting on topics related to online advertising.
Google announced a major change to its Safe Browsing feature in Chrome today.
The new server-side system can catch up to 25% more phishing attacks than using local lists.
Google is keeping privacy in mind as Safe Browsing doesn't share the URLs of sites you visit with the company.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Google's Safe Browsing feature will work in real-time by checking against a server-side list without sharing browsing habits with Google. However, this statement contradicts the fact that Chrome downloads a list of known sites once or twice per hour and now sends URLs to its servers for real-time checks. Secondly, the author claims that this new system can catch up to 25% more phishing attacks than using local lists. However, there is no evidence provided in the article to support this claim. Thirdly, the author uses technical jargon such as 'URL hashing guidance' and 'obfuscation' without providing any context or explanation for these terms.
The statement that Google will work in real-time by checking against a server-side list is deceptive because it contradicts the fact that Chrome downloads a list of known sites once or twice per hour and now sends URLs to its servers for real-time checks.
The use of technical jargon such as 'URL hashing guidance' and 'obfuscation' without providing any context or explanation for these terms is deceptive.
The claim that this new system can catch up to 25% more phishing attacks than using local lists is not supported by any evidence provided in the article.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article discusses a change to Google's Safe Browsing feature in Chrome that will make the service work in real time by checking against a server-side list. This is an improvement over previous methods as it allows for more frequent updates and can catch up to 25% more phishing attacks than using local lists. The article also mentions Google's Safe Browsing Enhanced Mode, which uses AI to block attacks that aren't on any list, performs deeper file scans, and includes protection from malicious Chrome extensions. However, the standard protection mode does not use these AI features.
Google announced a major change to its Safe Browsing feature in Chrome today
The company claims that this new server-side system can catch up to 25% more phishing attacks than using local lists.
Bias
(85%)
The author has a clear bias towards Google's new Safe Browsing feature in Chrome. The article is written from an informative perspective and provides detailed information about the changes being made to the service. However, there are several instances where the author uses language that portrays Google as a hero for implementing this change.
Google announced a major change to its Safe Browsing feature in Chrome today
Google goes to great lengths to explain how this system can work in real time without sharing your browsing data with the company.
The company claims that this new server-side system can catch up to 25% more phishing attacks than using local lists. These local lists have also grown in size, putting more of a strain on low-end machines and low-bandwidth connections.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24418649/STK114_Google_Chrome_02.jpg)
