Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Detected in Dairy Cattle for the First Time

Texas, Panhandle United States of America
Clinical samples of milk from sick cattle confirmed a strain of avian influenza.
Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) detected in dairy cattle for the first time
USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) confirmed HPAI on four dairy farms in Texas, believed to have been introduced by wild birds found dead on the farms.
Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Detected in Dairy Cattle for the First Time

The livestock industry is facing a new challenge with the detection of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) in dairy cattle. On Monday, March 27th, USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) confirmed that HPAI was detected on four dairy farms in Texas. The virus is believed to have been introduced by wild birds who were found dead on the farms. APHIS states that clinical samples of milk from sick cattle confirmed a strain of avian influenza, but there are no changes to the virus that would make it more transmissible to humans. This discovery marks the first time HPAI has been detected in livestock and is causing concern for both animal welfare and human health.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It's not clear if this is an isolated incident or if there are other cases that haven't been reported yet.

Sources

66%

  • Unique Points
    • The first case of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) detected in a livestock operation in Idaho
    • This diagnosis suggests that the virus can be transmitted from cow to cow as well as from infected birds
    • Symptoms of HPAI include: A drop in milk production, loss of appetite, changes in manure consistency, thickened or colostrum-like milk and low-grade fever
  • Accuracy
    • The facility where HPAI was detected had recently imported cattle from a state that has identified cases of the virus
    • Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) can be transmitted from cow to cow as well as infected birds
  • Deception (30%)
    The article is misleading in several ways. Firstly, the title mentions 'highly pathogenic avian influenza' which implies that it is a serious disease and poses a threat to human health. However, the body of the article states that there is no concern about the safety of commercial milk supply to consumer health at this time.
    • The title mentions 'highly pathogenic avian influenza' which implies that it is a serious disease and poses a threat to human health. However, the body of the article states that there is no concern about the safety of commercial milk supply to consumer health at this time.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that the Idaho State Department of Agriculture (ISDA) reported highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) has been found in dairy cattle operations in Cassia County. The ISDA is not a reliable source and their statement should be taken with caution.
    • The article states that the Idaho State Department of Agriculture (ISDA) reported highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) has been found in dairy cattle operations in Cassia County. This is an appeal to authority fallacy as the ISDA is not a reliable source and their statement should be taken with caution.
  • Bias (75%)
    The article contains a statement that the highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is transmitted from cow to cow and from infected birds. This implies a bias towards attributing the spread of HPAI solely to cows and not considering other factors such as human contact or environmental conditions.
    • The ISDA says that this diagnosis suggests that the virus is transmitted from cow to cow, as well as from infected birds.
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
      The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of highly pathogenic avian influenza transmission in Idaho dairy cattle. The article mentions that Scott Green is an expert on avian influenza and works at the Center for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (CAFE) which may have financial ties to companies or industries related to animal agriculture.
      • Scott Green is an expert on avian influenza and works at the Center for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (CAFE).
        • The article mentions that Scott Green is an expert on avian influenza.

        66%

        • Unique Points
          • Unpasteurized milk from three states has tested positive for avian influenza.
          • The facility where HPAI was detected had recently imported cattle from a state that has identified cases of the virus.
        • Accuracy
          No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
        • Deception (30%)
          The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that bird flu has reached cattle when it only mentions unpasteurized milk testing positive for avian influenza. Secondly, the sentence 'though the threat to consumers is low' misrepresents the severity of avian influenza and its potential impact on human health if consumed in contaminated food products.
          • The title implies that bird flu has reached cattle when it only mentions unpasteurized milk testing positive for avian influenza.
        • Fallacies (85%)
          The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that USDA officials have confirmed the presence of avian influenza in unpasteurized milk from three states. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when they describe the situation as a 'notable moment' and use words like 'evolving', which could be seen as sensationalist.
          • Unpasteurized milk from three states has tested positive for avian influenza, according to USDA officials.
        • Bias (75%)
          The article reports on the discovery of avian influenza in unpasteurized milk from three states. The author does not provide any information about how this virus reached the milk or if it was intentionally introduced by humans. This lack of context and potential for human involvement makes this an example of religious bias.
          • avian influenza
            • Unpasteurized milk
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            83%

            • Unique Points
              • Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) has been detected on four dairy farms in the US
              • APHIS believes wild migratory birds are to blame for the arrival of HPAI on these dairies
              • Additional testing was done after farms reported finding dead wild birds, and clinical samples of milk from sick cattle confirmed a strain of avian influenza
              • The DNA testing being done on the virus is consistent with that found in wild bird flu populations but there are no changes to the virus that would make it more transmissible to humans
            • Accuracy
              No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
            • Deception (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Fallacies (80%)
              The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that APHIS believes wild migratory birds are responsible for the outbreak without providing any evidence or citation. Additionally, the author quotes experts who use inflammatory rhetoric when describing the situation as a 'wild bird incursion' and emphasizing that it is not consistent with human transmission of HPAI. The article also contains an example of a dichotomous depiction by stating that mortality appears to be zero in cattle but has been high in poultry, without providing any context or explanation for the difference.
              • APHIS believes wild migratory birds are responsible for the outbreak
              • The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that APHIS believes wild migratory birds are responsible for the outbreak without providing any evidence or citation.
            • Bias (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              Tyne Morgan has a conflict of interest on the topic of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza as they are reporting on four U.S. dairies that have been affected by the virus and mentioning their sources such as APHIS, USDA, National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Kansas Animal Health Commissioner Justin Smith and Dr. Fred Gingrich who may also have a financial stake in the dairy industry.
              • The article mentions APHIS, USDA and National Veterinary Services Laboratories who may also have a financial stake in the livestock and poultry flocks that are affected by mammal-to-mammal transmission of viruses which could be seen as promoting their interests.
                • Tyne Morgan mentions four U.S. dairies that have been affected by Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza which could be seen as promoting the interests of the dairy industry.
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                  Tyne Morgan has a conflict of interest on the topic of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza as they are affiliated with APHIS and USDA. They also have personal relationships with Justin Smith and Dr. Fred Gingrich who may be affected by their reporting.
                  • Tyne Morgan is an employee of APHIS, which has been involved in the investigation into the arrival of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza on four U.S. dairies.

                  83%

                  • Unique Points
                    • Cows in the Texas Panhandle have tested positive for bird flu
                    • Similar outbreaks have been reported at dairies in Kansas and New Mexico
                    • The milk from impacted animals is being dumped or destroyed, will not enter the food supply
                    • Infected herds are expected to lose up to 40% of their milk production for 7-10 days until they recover from symptoms
                  • Accuracy
                    • `Unpasteurized milk from three states has tested positive for avian influenza.`
                  • Deception (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Fallacies (85%)
                    The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that the U.S. Department of Agriculture said there is no safety concern to the commercial milk supply and consumer health is also not at risk.
                    • > Infected herds are expected to lose up to 40% of their milk production for 7-10 days until they recover from their symptoms, Miller said. <br> > On average, about 10% of each affected herd appears to be infected.
                    • The animal health commission is working with the federal agriculture department and the Texas A&M Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, as well as other agencies, to continue evaluating the situation.
                  • Bias (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication

                  63%

                  • Unique Points
                    • . U.S. regulators confirmed that sick cattle in Texas, Kansas and possibly in New Mexico contracted avian influenza.
                    • . They stressed that the nation’s milk supply is safe.
                  • Accuracy
                    • The Idaho State Department of Agriculture (ISDA) reported highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) has been found in dairy cattle operations in Cassia County, which is the first case detected in a livestock operation in Idaho
                    • This diagnosis suggests that the virus can be transmitted from cow to cow, as well as from infected birds
                    • Symptoms of HPAI include: A drop in milk production, loss of appetite, changes in manure consistency, thickened or colostrum-like milk, and low-grade fever
                    • The ISDA is encouraging dairy farms to monitor their herd and immediately contact their veterinarian if symptoms arise
                  • Deception (30%)
                    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that 'the nation's milk supply is safe', but this statement contradicts itself as it mentions sick cattle and dead birds on farms. Secondly, the article states that pasteurization should inactivate the flu virus, which implies that unpasteurized milk can be harmful to consumers when in fact there have been no reports of deaths from consuming contaminated milk. Lastly, the author uses sensationalism by stating 'a form of avian influenza that is highly fatal in birds has been confirmed' without providing any context or information about how dangerous this virus actually is.
                    • The nation’s milk supply is safe.
                  • Fallacies (85%)
                    The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when the USDA states that the milk supply is safe despite there being no concern about it in their statement.
                    • > Advertisement SKIP ADVERTISEMENT <br> You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.<br><br> U.S. regulators confirmed that sick cattle in Texas, Kansas and possibly in New Mexico contracted avian influenza.
                    • <p>The cows appear to have been infected by wild birds, and dead birds were reported on some farms.</p>
                    • Pasteurization should inactivate the flu virus
                    • Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
                  • Bias (85%)
                    The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'nation's milk supply is safe' to reassure readers that there is no risk to consumer health, but this statement implies a belief in the safety of pasteurized dairy products which may not be true for all consumers.
                    • The U.S.D.A. said that dairy cattle in Texas and Kansas had tested positive for avian flu, but the agency asserted that the milk supply was safe.
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication