Possible prison sentence of up to 25 years if convicted
Some argue charges are politically motivated
Trial set to begin on June 6th, 2023
Hunter Biden's legal troubles began with the discovery of a gun in his brother's widow's truck in October 2018. This led to charges against him for three felony gun charges, which could result in up to 25 years in prison if he is convicted. The trial, set to begin on June 6th, has garnered much attention due to Hunter Biden's high-profile family and the potential impact on his father's presidency. However, some argue that the charges are politically motivated and that Hunter Biden was unfairly targeted because of his last name. Despite this, a plea deal was proposed last year but fell through. If convicted, Hunter Biden could face significant prison time and damage to his reputation.
Hunter Biden found a gun in Hallie Biden’s truck in October 2018 and this fact is not present in any other article.
Hunter Biden purchased a gun and answered ‘No’ on the federal form asking if he was an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance, but this information is not present in any other article.
Accuracy
Hunter Biden found a gun in Hallie Biden’s truck in October 2018
Hunter Biden purchased a gun and answered ‘No’ on the federal form asking if he was an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance.
Hunter Biden's addiction to crack cocaine was severe, affecting his relationships and public image.
Hunter Biden purchased a gun and answered ‘No’ on the federal form asking if he was an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance.
Addiction experts are divided on whether Hunter Biden could be considered sober or addicted during this period.
The legal definition of addiction is ancient and not universally agreed upon, leading to potential confusion in the trial.
Accuracy
]Hunter Biden purchased a gun and answered 'No' on the federal form asking if he was an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance.'[
']Addiction experts are divided on whether Hunter Biden could be considered sober or addicted during this period.['
Deception
(30%)
The article contains several examples of deception through omission and sensationalism. The author's personal opinions are mixed with facts, creating a misleading narrative. The article also fails to disclose sources, which is a requirement for credibility. Here are the specific instances of deception:
The author implies that Hunter Biden's recovery from addiction was solely due to falling in love with Melissa Cohen, without acknowledging the role of therapy or other forms of treatment.
The article omits any mention of the federal charges against Hunter Biden for failing to pay $1.4 million in taxes, which is relevant to his legal issues and overall narrative.
The article sensationalizes Hunter Biden's addiction by focusing on the explicit images and videos that were displayed in the House of Representatives, rather than providing a balanced and factual report on his addiction and legal issues.
The author uses sensational language when describing Hunter Biden's past behavior, such as 'drug-addled nights spent prowling homeless encampments for drugs' and 'alcoholic and drug addict', which lacks objectivity and contributes to the misleading narrative.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several instances of appeals to authority and inflammatory rhetoric. The author repeatedly refers to Hunter Biden's addiction as 'extreme' and 'grimy', implying a negative judgment without providing evidence or definition. Additionally, the author quotes experts who have differing opinions on whether Hunter Biden was an addict at the time of gun purchase, but does not provide any context or clarification on their qualifications or expertise. These fallacies do not necessarily invalidate the facts presented in the article, but they do influence the reader's perception and understanding of those facts.
It was so bad that he lived among a pool of sleazy hangers-on in grimy hotel rooms on two coasts, prowling camps of homeless people for drugs in the dead of night.
Substance abuse professionals – and the law itself – appear split over whether Biden was indeed an addict when he bought that revolver in 2018 and over the evolving meaning of addiction.
Some addiction experts aren’t so sure. ‘Eleven days is a treatment experience. It’s not a treatment success,’ said Kevin McEneaney, a former top official at Phoenix House, speaking from 30 years of working with people with substance use disorders.
The trial comes as, once again, the younger Biden finds himself at the center of a momentous presidential campaign and as a monthslong Republican move to impeach President Joe Biden has fizzled in the House.
Bias
(80%)
The article describes Hunter Biden's history of drug addiction in detail. While the author does not express any bias in the text itself, the title and some phrases used could be perceived as biased towards portraying Hunter Biden in a negative light due to his addiction. For example, 'Hunter Biden trial: Here’s why his gun case hinges on one fateful day when he wasn’t using drugs' implies that there is something unusual or suspicious about him not using drugs on that particular day. Additionally, phrases like 'grimy hotel rooms', 'pool of sleazy hangers-on', and 'extreme drug abuse' could be perceived as stigmatizing and biased against individuals with substance use disorders. However, these are subjective interpretations and do not necessarily reflect objective bias in the text.
Hunter Biden’s addiction to crack cocaine was so bad, he recalled, that he alienated his children and his famous father despite their repeated attempts to help.
It was so bad that he left his laptop at a Delaware repair shop and never came back for it until, in the heat of the 2020 presidential campaign, a worker passed the private contents of its hard drive, including explicit images and videos, to former President Donald Trump’s campaign lawyer Rudy Giuliani.
Hunter Biden faces up to 25 years in prison if convicted on three felony gun charges
Financial benefactor is reportedly ‘tapped out’
Accuracy
Hunter Biden argued that he was only charged because of his last name
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(95%)
The author expresses her opinion that Hunter Biden should take a plea deal due to the high likelihood of conviction based on the statistics provided in the article. This is an example of monetary bias as she implies that Hunter Biden's financial situation and his father's political standing make it more likely for him to receive a harsher sentence if convicted.
But that’s usually because drug use is hard to prove compared to other gun charges, like being a felon with a gun. Here, though, prosecutors have noted that ‘investigators literally found drugs on the pouch where the defendant had kept his gun.’ And when prosecutors do bring this charge, people who are found guilty are often sentenced to real prison time – over a year for someone in Hunter Biden’s shoes.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe to all of The Times. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. Already a subscriber? Log in. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
The vast majority facing a D.O.J. indictment decided either to plead guilty outright or accept a plea deal, believing that the prosecutor had correctly weighed their chances of winning in front of a jury before bringing the case in the first place.
Hunter Biden's first criminal trial begins on May 23, 2023 for gun charges.
,
Accuracy
Hunter Biden has been in and out of courtrooms since 2019 due to a civil case involving unpaid alimony to his ex-wife Kathleen Buhle.
Kathleen Buhle is likely to testify about Hunter’s drug use and finances in both of his upcoming trials over gun and tax charges.
The trials, one for gun charges starting on May 23, 2023 in Delaware and the other for tax charges set for Sept. 5, 2023 in California, are likely to include embarrassing revelations about the Biden family that will be used by Republicans.
Hunter Biden’s allies have considered starting a legal fund for him due to his myriad legal problems but have concerns about the political optics.
A D.C. court found Hunter Biden in breach of his divorce agreement and owed Buhle more than $1.7 million in spousal support, legal fees and interest since their 2017 divorce.
Buhle had filed her civil suit in June 2019, a week after news broke that Hunter had remarried and as Joe Biden was beginning his presidential campaign.
Their divorce agreement called for Hunter to pay Buhle $37,000 a month plus 50% of anything he made over $875,000 annually.
Hunter didn’t pay the additional spousal support he owed in 2017 and 2018 when he earned $2.4 million and $2.1 million respectively.
As a result, the court determined he owed Buhle $1.1 million plus 6% interest for 2017 and 2018.
Hunter largely stopped paying Buhle’s monthly alimony after she filed her lawsuit in June 2019, adding to his unpaid debts.
Hunter’s lawyers argued he wanted to pay Buhle but no longer had the money after his spiral into drug addiction. The legal battle grew increasingly hostile during Joe Biden’s presidential campaign.
After Hunter didn’t pay most of a court-ordered $259,000 plus interest by an April 15, 2020 deadline, Buhle’s lawyer asked the court to hold Hunter in contempt.
In July 2020, Hunter’s lawyers insinuated that Buhle was blackmailing Hunter with the threat to embarrass Biden’s presidential campaign.
A special master was appointed in November 2021 to help adjudicate the dispute. In April 2023, Buhle’s representative filed a motion stating that Hunter had continued to not pay alimony and paid her only $35,815.50 in 2022 when Morin was controlling the process.
Buhle’s lawyer argued Hunter owed Buhle more than $2.9 million, including money borrowed for federal back taxes and child support in Arkansas related to a child Hunter had with another woman.
Deception
(30%)
The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the author's position. The author states 'Hunter Biden's first criminal trial begins Monday, but he quietly has been in and out of courtrooms since 2019 in a messy, multimillion-dollar civil case involving unpaid alimony to his ex-wife Kathleen Buhle.' This statement is selective as it only mentions the unpaid alimony aspect of the civil case and ignores other details such as disputes over Hunter's drug use and finances. The author also states 'Buhle is likely to testify about Hunter’s drug use and finances in both of his upcoming trials over gun and tax charges.' This statement is an assumption made by the author, not a fact, as there is no confirmation that Buhle will indeed testify about Hunter's drug use or finances in the upcoming trials.
Hunter’s myriad legal problems … have led his allies to reconsider starting a legal fund for him, despite concerns by Biden aides about the political optics of it.
The trials … are likely to include embarrassing revelations about the Biden family that almost certainly will be touted by Republicans in light of Donald Trump’s felony conviction.
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(80%)
The author, Alex Thompson, demonstrates a clear bias towards portraying Hunter Biden's legal issues as embarrassments for his father and potential political ammunition for Republicans. The article repeatedly mentions the timing of Hunter's legal problems in relation to his father's campaign and the potential impact on the election.
But he quietly has been in and out of courtrooms since 2019 in a messy, multimillion-dollar civil case involving unpaid alimony to his ex-wife Kathleen Buhle, according to court documents.
Hunter’s myriad legal problems – including the divorce case with Buhle – have led his allies to reconsider starting a legal fund for him, despite concerns by Biden aides about the political optics of it.
The trials – the gun case that starts Monday in Delaware and the tax case set for Sept. 5 in California – are likely to include embarrassing revelations about the Biden family that almost certainly will be touted by Republicans in light of Donald Trump’s felony conviction.
