Sarah Isgur

Sarah Isgur is a journalist currently writing for The New York Times. She has covered various topics in her career, including politics and legal affairs. Her recent work focuses on the intersection of law and technology, as well as the impact of social media on society.

Biography:  https://www.nytimes.com/by/sarah-isgur

92%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author is known for its high journalistic standards. The author strives to maintain neutrality and transparency in its reporting, and avoids conflicts of interest. The author has a reputation for accuracy and rarely gets contradicted on major discrepancies in its reporting.

Bias

80%

Examples:

  • The author seems to favor presenting the prosecutor's perspective on Hunter Biden's case, implying that drug charges like this one usually lead to real prison time for individuals in Hunter Biden's situation.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

  • There is no direct conflict of interest identified in this article. However, given that Sarah Isgur is writing for The New York Times, there may be an implied conflict of interest due to the newspaper's reputation and potential influence.

Contradictions

5%

Examples:

  • The author contradicts themselves by stating that 'Hunter Biden argued that he was only charged because of his last name', while also mentioning evidence against this claim, such as drugs being found on the pouch where the gun was kept.

Deceptions

100%

Examples:

  • The author presents information in a way that could be considered deceptive. For example, they quote a statement from prosecutors without providing counterarguments or context, which may lead readers to believe the case against Hunter Biden is stronger than it might actually be.

Recent Articles

Hunter Biden's Gun Charges: Potential 25-Year Prison Sentence and Political Implications

Hunter Biden's Gun Charges: Potential 25-Year Prison Sentence and Political Implications

Broke On: Tuesday, 23 May 2023 Hunter Biden faces up to 25 years in prison for three felony gun charges discovered in his brother's widow's truck in 2018. The high-profile trial, set for June 6th, has sparked debate over political motivation and fairness due to his last name. A plea deal was proposed but fell through.