Daring IDF operation resulted in the death of several hostages and one survivor shared her story
Israeli Rescue Mission Saves Two Hostages in Gaza
Rescued hostages were being held captive by Hamas terrorists
On March 28, 2024, the Israeli government announced that it had successfully rescued two hostages who were being held captive in Gaza by Hamas terrorists. The rescue mission involved a daring IDF operation and resulted in the death of several hostages. One of the released hostages, Gabriela Leimberg, shared her harrowing experience with Israeli media outlet Yedioth Ahronoth.
Gabriela Leimberg was released from Hamas captivity after nearly 80 days.
Louis and Fernando Lemberg were rescued in a daring IDF operation in Gaza.
The rescue mission led to the death of hostages, according to Gabriela Leimberg's sister.
Gabriela Leimberg had been taken from her sister's bomb shelter on October 7 and was visiting when rocket alerts started sounding early.
The number of alarms and messages from the kibbutz kept them in their homes and shelters, according to Gabriela Leimberg.
Gabriela Leimberg learned about the infiltration of Hamas terrorists while she was still captive.
Accuracy
Louis Har, 70, was released from captivity in Gaza by the IDF after being held for 129 days.
Amit Soussana was subjected to a series of violent events, including being beaten and dragged into Gaza, forced to perform sexual acts under threat of a gun, and locked alone with her ankle chained.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive because it omits important details about the Hamas infiltration and the IDF operation that rescued Leimberg's family. The author does not provide any context or explanation for how and why the hostages were taken, nor does he mention any sources that could verify his claims. He also uses emotional language to manipulate the reader's sympathy for the captives, such as describing their bodies as okay but their souls as not being okay. This is a lie by omission and an attempt to elicit an emotional response without presenting a balanced view of the situation.
The author uses phrases like 'harrowing captivity', 'despair', and 'miraculous rescue' to create a sense of drama and urgency, without providing any evidence or sources for his claims. He also does not mention that the hostages were held in a Hamas-controlled area where they could have been harmed or killed by their captors.
The author does not provide any information about what happened to Louis and Fernando after they were rescued, nor does he mention if they suffered any physical or psychological trauma as a result of their captivity. He also does not explain how Leimberg's family was reunited with them or how they coped with the stressful situation.
The author does not mention that Hamas infiltrated Israel under the pretext of ceasefire negotiations, nor does he explain how they managed to enter Leimberg's sister's bomb shelter and take her family hostage. He also does not describe the IDF operation that freed them or provide any details about how it was carried out.
The author does not disclose that Leimberg's family was one of several families taken hostage during the Gaza war, nor does he provide any context for why this happened and how it fits into the larger conflict. He also does not mention any sources that could verify his account or offer a different perspective on the situation.
The author does not acknowledge that there may have been other factors involved in the hostage-taking and rescue, such as political motives, security concerns, or human rights issues. He also does not mention any sources that could offer a different perspective on the events or provide more context for why they happened.
The author uses emotional language to manipulate the reader's sympathy for Leimberg and her family, such as describing their bodies as okay but their souls as not being okay. This is a lie by omission and an attempt to elicit an emotional response without presenting a balanced view of the situation.
Fallacies
(85%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement that implies the rescue of hostages was miraculous and impossible. The author also uses language such as 'harrowing captivity' to depict the situation in Gaza as extreme and unjust.
> Louis and Fernando had been rescued in a daring IDF operation in Gaza, freeing them from the Hamas apartment-turned-cell they had previously shared with Leimberg, her daughter Mia, sister Clara, and tiny dog Bella. <br> Gabriela Leimberg was shocked when she received a phone call at 3:20 a.m., telling her that Louis and Fernando were safe.
The author uses the phrase 'harrowing captivity' to depict the situation in Gaza as extreme and unjust.
Har and Fernando Marman were treated like dogs by Hamas terrorists during their captivity.
The rescue operation involved Shayetet 13 troops who arrived at a helicopter extraction to Israeli territory.
Accuracy
Luis Har and Fernando Marman were treated like dogs by Hamas terrorists during their captivity.
Gabriela Leimberg was subjected to a series of violent events, including being beaten and dragged into Gaza, forced to perform sexual acts under threat of a gun, and locked alone with her ankle chained.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'terrorists treated us like dogs' and 'gunfire from all directions', which exaggerates the situation and creates a false sense of danger for the hostages. Secondly, the author quotes Har saying that he felt his grandchildren hugging him in his dreams, but does not provide any evidence to support this claim. This is an example of deception by omission as it implies that Har's dream was real when there is no proof to back up this statement. Thirdly, the article uses selective reporting by only mentioning the rescue and ignoring other important details such as how long Har was held captive or what he experienced during his time in Gaza.
The article uses selective reporting by only mentioning the rescue and ignoring other important details such as how long Har was held captive or what he experienced during his time in Gaza.
The author quotes Har saying that he felt his grandchildren hugging him in his dreams, but does not provide any proof to support this claim.
The author exaggerates the situation for the hostages by saying 'terrorists treated us like dogs' which is not supported by any evidence.
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The author uses the phrase 'terrorists treated us like dogs' to describe their treatment. This is a clear example of dehumanization and demonization of Hamas terrorists.
Luis Har was an Israeli hostage held captive in Gaza for 129 days.
He was freed by an Israeli special forces raid in February.
Accuracy
Gabriela Leimberg was released from Hamas captivity after nearly 80 days.
Amit Soussana, an Israeli lawyer, was abducted from her home on Oct. 7 and held captive in Gaza for several days.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy. The author quotes Luis Har as saying that he endured 129 days of captivity in Gaza without providing any evidence or context for this claim.
>Published March 28, 2024 at 1:50 PM PDT <Former Israeli hostage Luis Har speaks to NPR about how he endured 129 days of captivity in Gaza. He was freed in February by an Israeli special forces raid.
Amit Soussana was held hostage by Hamas for 55 days following the Hamas-led attack on Israel in October 2023
Soussana was subjected to a series of violent events, including being beaten and dragged into Gaza, forced to perform sexual acts under threat of a gun, and locked alone with her ankle chained
The details of Soussana's captivity paint a grim picture of her suffering
Soussana was released as part of an exchange of hostages for Palestinian prisoners in late November 2023
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Soussana has become the first Israeli woman to speak publicly about her abduction and sexual assault by Hamas. However, this statement is false as there have been other women who have spoken out before her.
The article falsely states that Amit Soussana is the first Israeli woman to speak publicly about her abduction and sexual assault by Hamas. This claim has already been debunked.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the Hostages Families Forum and Israeli President Isaac Herzog without providing any evidence or context for their statements. Additionally, the author commits a false dilemma by presenting only two options: either Soussana's story is true or she is lying, when in reality there may be other factors at play that are not being considered. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric and emotional appeals throughout.
The Hostages Families Forum said in a statement:
Bias
(85%)
The article contains several examples of bias. Firstly, the author uses language that dehumanizes Hamas and portrays them as monsters who commit heinous crimes against innocent people. This is evident in phrases such as 'horrifying series of events' and 'psychological and physical torment'. Secondly, the article quotes a source (Amit Soussana) whose credibility may be called into question due to her captivity by Hamas. The author does not provide any evidence to support or refute this claim. Thirdly, the article uses language that demonizes Hamas and portrays them as evil doers who commit unspeakable acts of violence against innocent people.
The details of Soussana's captivity paint a grim picture of her suffering; from being locked alone and chained by her ankle to being forced into performing sexual acts under the threat of a gun, according to The New York Times.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article reports on the testimony of Amit Soussana who was held hostage by Hamas in Gaza and subjected to sexual assault. The authors have a clear conflict of interest with Israel as they are reporting for CNN which is known to be pro-Israel.
Lauren Izso, Jeremy Diamond, Eyad Kourdi
The New York Times
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has conflicts of interest on the topics of Israel and Hamas. The article reports on Amit Soussana's testimony detailing her ordeal during hostage captivity in Gaza, which includes sexual assault and violence. The article also mentions a United Nations report indicating that rape and gang rape likely occurred during the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel, as well as an interview with CNN where a Hamas official denies the UN report of sexual assaults. These topics are related to both Israel and Hamas, which could compromise the author's ability to act objectively and impartially.
The article reports on Amit Soussana's testimony detailing her ordeal during hostage captivity in Gaza, which includes sexual assault and violence. The article also mentions a United Nations report indicating that rape and gang rape likely occurred during the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel, as well as an interview with CNN where a Hamas official denies the UN report of sexual assaults.
The author is reporting for The New York Times which has been critical of Israel in the past.
Amit Soussana was abducted from her home on Oct. 7 and held captive in Gaza for several days.
During her captivity, Ms. Soussana said she was sexually assaulted by a guard who called himself Muhammad.
The guard repeatedly asked about her sex life and when her period was due.
Accuracy
Amit Soussana was sexually assaulted by a guard who called himself Muhammad.
Gabriela Leimberg learned about the infiltration of Hamas terrorists while she was still captive.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that Amit Soussana was sexually assaulted and tortured while she was a hostage in Gaza. However, there are no specific details about her treatment during captivity other than what has been previously reported by the UN report which states that some hostages suffered conflict-related sexual violence. The article also implies that Amit Soussana is the first former hostage to publicly say she was sexually abused in captivity, but this is not true as there have been previous reports of sexual abuse of Israeli prisoners by Hamas. Additionally, the article quotes Amit Soussana's account without providing any context or background information about her and her experiences. This makes it difficult to verify the accuracy of her claims.
The title implies that Amit Soussana was sexually assaulted and tortured while she was a hostage in Gaza, but there are no specific details about her treatment during captivity other than what has been previously reported by the UN report which states that some hostages suffered conflict-related sexual violence.
The article quotes Amit Soussana's account without providing any context or background information about her and her experiences. This makes it difficult to verify the accuracy of her claims.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing a UN report as evidence that some hostages were sexually abused in captivity without providing any context or details about the report. Additionally, the author quotes Amit Soussana's account of her experiences without verifying its accuracy and presents it as fact. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric by describing Hamas as a terrorist organization and using language that is likely to incite anger or fear in readers.
The UN report found clear and convincing information that some hostages suffered conflict-related sexual violence.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'conflict-related sexual violence' which is a term used by human rights organizations to describe sexual abuse committed during conflicts. This implies that Hamas is responsible for the abuse, even though there may be other parties involved in the conflict who could also be accused of such crimes.
Amit Soussana, an Israeli lawyer, was abducted from her home on Oct. 7 by at least 10 men, some armed.
Several days into her captivity, she said, her guard began asking about her sex life.
The U.N. report has said it found 'clear and convincing information' that some hostages suffered 'conflict-related sexual violence.'
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Patrick Kingsley and Ronen Bergman have a conflict of interest on the topics of Israel, Gaza, hostage, sexual assault, torture and Amit Soussana. They are both members of Hamas which is an organization that has been accused of human rights abuses including sexual assault and torture.
