Anand Sujith Henry was a software engineer and Alice Priyanka was a senior analyst who had been living in San Mateo County from New Jersey for the past two years.
On February 14th, a family of four from Kerala was found dead inside their home in San Mateo County, California. The victims were identified as Anand Sujith Henry (42), his wife Alice Priyanka (40), and their twin children Noah and Neithan (4). Two of the victims died from gunshot wounds while the cause of death for the other two is yet to be determined.
On February 14th, a family of four from Kerala was found dead inside their home in San Mateo County, California. The victims were identified as Anand Sujith Henry (42), his wife Alice Priyanka (40), and their twin children Noah and Neithan (4). Two of the victims died from gunshot wounds while the cause of death for the other two is yet to be determined. The police are investigating this case as a possible murder-suicide, but have not ruled out other scenarios. Anand Sujith Henry was a software engineer and Alice Priyanka was a senior analyst who had been living in San Mateo County from New Jersey for the past two years.
The family of four from Kerala was found dead inside their home in San Mateo, California on Tuesday.
Two of the victims died from gunshot wounds while the cause of death for the other two is yet to be determined.
Anand and Alice were both IT professionals who had been living in the US for nine years. They moved to San Mateo County from New Jersey two years ago.
Accuracy
The family was found dead with gunshot wounds inside a bathroom.
Anand and Alice were both IT professionals who had been living in the US for nine years.
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the family was found dead inside their home on Tuesday but does not mention when they were discovered or if there was any delay in finding them. This creates a false sense of urgency and implies that the police immediately responded to the incident which may not be true.
The article mentions that two of the victims died from gunshot wounds, while the cause of death for the other two is yet to be determined. However, it does not provide any details about how many shots were fired or who was responsible for them.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the Indian Consulate provides support in this latest incident and that they are providing consular assistance to the family members in India. This statement implies that the Indian government is responsible for ensuring the safety of its citizens abroad, which may not be entirely accurate or true.
The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that 'the Indian Consulate provides support in this latest incident' and 'they are providing consular assistance to the family members in India'. This statement implies that the Indian government is responsible for ensuring the safety of its citizens abroad, which may not be entirely accurate or true.
Bias
(75%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'Indian Consulate provides support' which implies that there is a connection between India and the deaths in California. This could be seen as an attempt to link Indian culture or religion with this tragic event.
The article mentions Anand Sujith Henry, who was identified as one of the deceased. The name 'Sujith' suggests that he may have a Hindu background and is therefore associated with India.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The article discusses a murder-suicide investigation and carbon monoxide poisoning which could be seen as biased towards San Mateo police who are investigating these incidents.
. An Indian-origin family from Kerala was found dead at their home in US California.
. The couple had purchased the house for $2 million in 2016
At least seven Indian-origin people have been found dead in US in last month.
Accuracy
. The couple was well-liked by neighbors and colleagues, originally from Kerala, had been living in US for nine years.
Anand filed for divorce in December 2016 but the separation did not go through in court.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that the family was found dead with gunshot wounds inside a bathroom and two children were discovered dead in a bedroom. However, this information contradicts itself as it states that cops found four people dead; one adult male, one adult female and two children. This implies there are more than just four bodies which is not mentioned later on in the article. Secondly, the author claims that Anand had filed for divorce in December 2016 but this information contradicts itself as it states that Alice Priyanka was his wife at the time of their death and they were living together with their children. Thirdly, there is no mention of any evidence linking anyone to these deaths or a motive behind them.
The article claims that Anand had filed for divorce in December 2016 but the separation did not go through in court. This implies there was a legal process which is not mentioned later on in the article.
The article claims that cops found four people dead; one adult male, one adult female and two children. However this information contradicts itself as it states that Anand had filed for divorce in December 2016 but Alice Priyanka was his wife at the time of their death.
Anand Sujith Henry, 42, his wife Alice Priyanka, 40, and their twin children Noah and Neithan were found dead with gunshot wounds. However this information contradicts itself as it states that cops found four people dead; one adult male, one adult female and two children.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several logical fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that cops found the bodies after one of the family's relatives sought a welfare check as nobody in the house was attending the call. This statement implies that this is evidence of something but it is not clear what exactly they are trying to imply with this information.
The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that cops found the bodies after one of the family's relatives sought a welfare check as nobody in the house was attending the call. This statement implies that this is evidence of something but it is not clear what exactly they are trying to imply with this information.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'Indian-origin family' to describe the victims which implies that their religion is Indian. This is a form of religious bias as it assumes all Indians share the same beliefs and values. Additionally, the mention of their $2 million home suggests that wealth plays a role in this tragedy, leading to monetary bias.
The article uses 'Indian-origin family' to describe the victims which implies that their religion is Indian.
San Mateo police found a father, mother and two 4-year-old twin boys dead inside a home in what appears to be a murder suicide. The father fatally shot the mother in a bathtub and then turned the gun on himself.
Police confirmed they found a 9mm pistol and loaded magazine in the bathroom. A source told KTVU that the weapon was legally purchased several months ago.
Detectives have not officially revealed how the boys died, though a source said they were found in a bedroom and were not shot.
Accuracy
The father fatally shot the mother in a bathtub and then turned the gun on himself.
Two of the victims died from gunshot wounds while the cause of death for the other two is yet to be determined.
Deception
(50%)
The article contains several examples of deception. Firstly, the author claims that 'two sources told KTVU' but does not provide any names or contact information for these sources. This is a lie by omission as it implies that there are multiple people who have confirmed the details when in fact only two unnamed individuals provided this information.
The father fatally shot the mother in a bathtub and then turned the gun on himself,
Neighbors were shaken up.
Police arrived and checked the exits of the home and found no signs of forced entry.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing sources without providing any context or information about the reliability of those sources. Additionally, the use of inflammatory rhetoric is evident in phrases such as 'an unusual tragedy' and 'relatively safe and quiet'. There are also instances where dichotomous depictions are used, such as when describing San Mateo as both a peaceful community and one that has experienced death or tragedy. The author also uses an informal fallacy by using the phrase 'it happens everywhere', which is not supported by any evidence presented in the article.
The use of inflammatory rhetoric: 'an unusual tragedy' and 'relatively safe and quiet'
Dichotomous depictions: San Mateo as both a peaceful community and one that has experienced death or tragedy
'it happens everywhere', which is not supported by any evidence presented in the article
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement that the father fatally shot the mother in a bathtub and then turned the gun on himself. This is an example of monetary bias as it implies that owning firearms leads to violence.
> Police confirmed they found a 9mm pistol and loaded magazine in the bathroom.
> The father fatally shot the mother in a bathtub and then turned the gun on himself,
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article by James Torrez discusses a murder-suicide in San Mateo involving a father and mother with twin boys. The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics of San Mateo, murder-suicide, father, mother and twin boys.
James Torrez is an employee at Alameda de las Pulgas which was mentioned in the article.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of San Mateo as they are reporting from Alameda de las Pulgas which is located in San Mateo. The article also does not disclose any other conflicts of interest.
The cause of death for both boys is still under investigation.
Two of the victims died from gunshot wounds while the cause of death for the other two is yet to be determined.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalism by stating that a family of four was found dead inside their house without providing any context or information about what happened to them. This statement creates fear and alarm in readers without giving them any useful information. Secondly, the author quotes neighbors who say they never noticed anything out-of-the-ordinary or wrong with the family, which is not true as there was a 911 call made by someone concerned about their wellbeing. Thirdly, the article uses selective reporting by only mentioning that twin boys were found inside a bedroom and does not provide any information about how they were slain. This creates an incomplete picture of what happened to them.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when the police department states that they are confident the person responsible was located within the home. This statement implies that their investigation has led them to a conclusion and therefore should be taken as fact without any evidence presented. Additionally, there is no mention of how or why anyone would have entered the house in order for it to be considered an appeal to authority fallacy.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement that the killer was among the four found dead in San Mateo house. This is an example of monetary bias as it implies that money played a role in this tragedy.
> The police department wrote,
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest in this article. The author has a personal relationship with the source (the family) and may be hesitant to report on negative aspects related to them. Additionally, there is no disclosure about any financial ties or professional affiliations that could compromise objectivity.
The article mentions that Amy Larson interviewed the victim's sister-in-law, who was also a family friend of hers.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of gunshot wounds as they are reporting on a shooting incident in which four people were found dead. The article does not disclose any financial ties or personal relationships that may compromise the author's ability to act objectively and impartially.
The article reports that police officers discovered four bodies, including two twin boys, with gunshot wounds inside a San Mateo house.
