Former Trump Attorney Michael Cohen to Testify in Criminal Trial Over Hush Money Payments

New York, New York, USA United States of America
American Media Inc. paid Karen McDougal $150,000 for her story and agreed not to publish it
Cohen paid Stormy Daniels $130,000 for nondisclosure agreement
Former Trump attorney Michael Cohen to testify in criminal trial over hush money payments
Trump pleaded not guilty to falsifying business records related to these payments
Trump's company reimbursed Cohen and American Media Inc. for payments
Former Trump Attorney Michael Cohen to Testify in Criminal Trial Over Hush Money Payments

In a significant development in the ongoing criminal trial of Donald Trump, former President Trump's former personal attorney, Michael Cohen, is scheduled to testify next week. Cohen is expected to provide testimony related to hush money payments made during the 2016 election campaign. The payments were made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels and a model named Karen McDougal in order to silence allegations of extramarital affairs with Trump.

Cohen paid Daniels $130,000 as part of a nondisclosure agreement that required her to stay quiet about her sexual encounter with Trump. Similarly, American Media Inc., the publisher of National Enquirer, paid McDougal $150,000 for her story and agreed not to publish it. These payments were later reimbursed by Trump's company and are at the heart of the criminal charges against him.

Trump has pleaded not guilty to falsifying business records related to these payments. The trial, which began in January 2024, is being held at the Manhattan Criminal Courthouse and is being presided over by Judge Juan Merchan.

Cohen's testimony could be crucial for the prosecution as he has already implicated Trump in these payments during his previous testimony before Congress. However, Cohen himself has been sentenced to three years in prison for various crimes including campaign finance violations and lying to Congress.

The trial is entering its final stages with both sides presenting their closing arguments next week. Prosecutors are expected to call several witnesses, including Madeleine Westerhout, a former executive assistant at the White House, and Daniel Dixon, an AT&T compliance analyst who allegedly helped facilitate one of the payments.

Judge Merchan has instructed Cohen to refrain from making any further comments about the case or Trump. The judge did not impose a formal gag order but warned Cohen that any future violations could result in sanctions.



Confidence

91%

Doubts
  • It's important to note that Cohen himself has been sentenced to prison for various crimes.
  • The trial is entering its final stages, but it's unclear if Cohen's testimony will be enough for a conviction.

Sources

78%

  • Unique Points
    • Judge Juan Merchan directed Michael Cohen to stop making comments about the case and former President Trump without imposing a gag order.
    • Cohen arranged a $130,000 payment in 2016 to adult actress Stormy Daniels to silence her story of a sexual encounter with Trump.
    • Trump later made several payments of $35,000 to Cohen as part of the arrangement and has pleaded not guilty to falsifying business records related to these payments.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (30%)
    The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the author's position. The author states 'Legal experts told Fox News Digital Cohen might have 'torpedoed'' the case before taking the stand by ranting about it on TikTok while fundraising.' However, no legal experts are quoted in the article to back up this claim. Additionally, there is emotional manipulation as the author uses phrases like 'big win' and 'major problem for prosecutors' to elicit an emotional response from readers.
    • But Trump defense attorneys say the $35,000 payments were ‘not a payback’, but instead legal payments or attorney’s fees.
    • It is a major problem for prosecutors. It is not a problem for Cohen’s credibility because he has none. He is a convicted perjurer and fraudster whose current ‘defense’ of his fraud convictions is that he wasn’t telling the truth when he pled guilty.
    • Legal experts told Fox News Digital Cohen might have ‘torpedoed’ the case before taking the stand by ranting about it on TikTok while fundraising.
    • If I’m the prosecution, I’m on the phone right now saying, ‘Stop what you are doing – right now’,
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The author makes an appeal to authority by quoting legal experts and using their opinions as evidence. This is a fallacy because the truth or falsehood of a statement does not depend on the authority of the person making it. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing Cohen as a 'convicted liar' and 'fraudster', which is an emotional appeal that does not add to the logical argument. Additionally, there are dichotomous depictions in the article, such as describing Trump's legal team's argument as 'not a payback but instead legal payments or attorney’s fees' versus Bragg trying to prove 'those payments were reimbursements for the payment to Daniels'. This creates a false dichotomy and oversimplifies the complex issue at hand.
    • ][Andrew McCarthy]" It is a major problem for prosecutors. It is not a problem for Cohen’s credibility because he has none. He is a convicted perjurer and fraudster whose current ‘defense’ of his fraud convictions is that he wasn’t telling the truth when he pled guilty,
  • Bias (80%)
    The author uses language that depicts Michael Cohen as a 'convicted liar' and 'fraudster', implying a negative view of him. The author also quotes legal experts who use similar language to describe Cohen. This could be seen as an attempt to sway the reader's perception of Cohen.
    • But Trump defense attorneys say the $35,000 payments were ‘not a payback’, but instead legal payments or attorney’s fees. Trump has pleaded not guilty to 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. Legal experts told Fox News Digital Cohen might have ‘torpedoed’ the case before taking the stand by ranting about it on TikTok while fundraising.
      • Defense attorney Jeremy Saland, who used to work in the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, told ABC News Trump’s legal team can use Cohen’s actions to ‘tear down his credibility.’
        • It is a major problem for prosecutors because they chose to build a case on a witness with a track record of bad conduct and deep bias and, not surprisingly, he can’t help himself but continue to act in character.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        93%

        • Unique Points
          • Donald Trump is on trial for falsifying business records to conceal a hush money payment to Stormy Daniels in Manhattan Criminal Courthouse.
          • Stormy Daniels testified about the alleged sexual affair she had with Donald Trump and his efforts to conceal it for nearly seven hours.
          • Madeleine Westerhout, a former executive assistant to Trump at the White House, testified for just under two hours over two days.
          • Daniel Dixon, Jennie Tomalin, Jaden Jarmel-Schneider and Georgia Longstreet were among the witnesses who testified in the trial.
          • Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to conceal a hush money payment to Daniels.
        • Accuracy
          • Donald Trump is on trial for falsifying business records to conceal a hush money payment to Stormy Daniels
          • Michael Cohen is expected to take the witness stand in the trial of N.Y. v. Trump on Monday.
        • Deception (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Fallacies (95%)
          The author makes an appeal to unfairness when stating 'Everybody can say whatever they want, but I'm not allowed to say anything about anybody.' This is a fallacy of appeals to unfairness as the situation may be unfavorable for Trump, but it does not make his statement true or just. The author also quotes Trump making statements outside of the courtroom which are irrelevant to the trial and do not contain any logical fallacies.
          • 'Everybody can say whatever they want, but I’m not allowed to say anything about anybody.'
        • Bias (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        99%

        • Unique Points
          • Michael Cohen is expected to testify against Donald J. Trump in an ongoing criminal trial.
          • Cohen has been outspoken in his taunting of Trump, recently posting a TikTok video wearing a shirt with a picture of Trump behind bars.
          • Cohen says that records of his reimbursements for the hush-money payment were falsified in 2017 at Trump’s direction.
        • Accuracy
          No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
        • Deception (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Fallacies (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Bias (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        100%

        • Unique Points
          • Michael Cohen is scheduled to testify in Trump's falsifying business records case next week.
          • Stormy Daniels received $130,000 from Michael Cohen in 2016 as part of a nondisclosure agreement.
          • The nondisclosure agreement required Stormy Daniels to stay quiet about her sexual encounter with Donald Trump.
        • Accuracy
          No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
        • Deception (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Fallacies (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Bias (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication