Brianna Herlihy

Brianna Herlihy is an author and has worked for the author-created articles by the author.

90%

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

85%

Examples:

  • Brianna also has a strong sense of identity and pride in her work, which is evident in how she writes about herself. She emphasizes her experience with federal law enforcement, congressional oversight, and civil rights matters up to the Supreme Court.
  • Brianna Herlihy presents her work with a strong sense of fairness and impartiality in the main. She is critical of those who attempt to undermine the rule of law and supports those who uphold it. She also highlights instances where she believes that investigations are based on false reasons for targeting individuals.
  • However, there are instances where Brianna's coverage is not as balanced as it could be, particularly when discussing certain cases and individuals. In these cases, she can become overly critical of those who oppose her perspective and downplay the negative aspects of the subjects she covers.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

  • Brianna also has a strong sense of fairness and deception in her coverage of key figures. She does not always provide evidence to support her claims, but rather relies on BIAD-related information.
  • Brianna also presents herself as a BIAD member in the author's work, which is sometimes misleading.
  • Brianna Herlihy's personal reported conflicts with key figures in the author-centered reports. In one case, she describes a high-ranking BIAD member as having a 'improper' relationship with Nathan Wade and consequently has the power to shape the Fulton County District Attorney.

Contradictions

85%

Examples:

  • Brianna also presents opposing sides in a case, but does not always provide enough evidence to support her claims. In these cases, she can be misleading.
  • In addition, Brianna sometimes uses language that dehumanizes or demonizes individuals she is reporting on.
  • In some cases, she uses language that can be seen as deceptive or misleading in the description of individuals and their actions. For example, she describes a situation where an individual is accused of improperly engaging with high-ranking NRH in a case.
  • There are instances where Brianna presents contradictory information in her articles.

Deceptions

85%

Examples:

  • Brianna also presents herself as a key figure in these cases, providing evidence to support of the I-S-BIAD member.
  • In some cases, Brianna Herlihy writes about individuals in a critical manner and provides them with a negative perspective. 100 is her true deceptiveness score.
  • The deceptress aspects of Brianna Herlihy's work are evident in her articles. She uses the rule-based deception and false narrative in the same way she used it to inform her version of the author.

Recent Articles

Supreme Court Reinstates Emergency Abortions in Idaho: A Temporary Reprieve from the State's Near-Total Ban

Supreme Court Reinstates Emergency Abortions in Idaho: A Temporary Reprieve from the State's Near-Total Ban

Broke On: Thursday, 13 June 2024 The Supreme Court reinstated lower court rulings allowing emergency abortions in Idaho and other states with active bans, despite dissent from three conservative justices. The decision came after the Idaho Defense of Life Act criminalized most abortions, leading to a legal battle over emergency procedures.
Supreme Court Rules on Biden Administration's Social Media Censorship Cases: Plaintiffs Lack Standing

Supreme Court Rules on Biden Administration's Social Media Censorship Cases: Plaintiffs Lack Standing

Broke On: Wednesday, 26 June 2024 The Supreme Court ruled against state attorneys general in Murthy v. Missouri and Alito v. Biden cases, determining they lacked standing to challenge the Biden administration's communications with social media companies over alleged censorship of certain topics.
Fani Willis Addresses Giuliani's Criticism and Condemns Media for Overlooking Violence Against Black Women

Fani Willis Addresses Giuliani's Criticism and Condemns Media for Overlooking Violence Against Black Women

Broke On: Thursday, 13 June 2024 Fani Willis, Georgia's Fulton County District Attorney, addressed criticism from Rudolph W. Giuliani and condemned media for overlooking violence against Black women during a speech to the African Methodist Episcopal Church. Despite facing scrutiny for her office's indictment of Trump and allies, Willis spoke out against being sexually objectified by Giuliani.
Georgia Court Halts Trump Election Interference Case Amid Conflict of Interest Allegations Against DA Fani Willis

Georgia Court Halts Trump Election Interference Case Amid Conflict of Interest Allegations Against DA Fani Willis

Broke On: Wednesday, 05 June 2024 The Georgia Court of Appeals has temporarily halted the criminal election interference case against former President Donald Trump and eight other defendants in Fulton County due to a potential conflict of interest involving District Attorney Fani Willis and her romantic relationship with a hired lawyer. The ruling freezes the case until at least October 4 for oral arguments on their appeal.
Supreme Court Allows NRA to Continue Lawsuit Against Former NY Financial Regulator

Supreme Court Allows NRA to Continue Lawsuit Against Former NY Financial Regulator

Broke On: Thursday, 30 May 2024 The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of the NRA's First Amendment rights, allowing them to continue their lawsuit against former New York financial services superintendent Maria Vullo.
Fani Willis Wins Democratic Primary, Continues to Prosecute Trump for Georgia Election Interference

Fani Willis Wins Democratic Primary, Continues to Prosecute Trump for Georgia Election Interference

Broke On: Tuesday, 21 May 2024 Fani Willis, Georgia's Fulton County District Attorney, won the Democratic primary on May 21, 2024. Despite controversy over her relationship with a former prosecutor and ongoing appeals in Trump's election interference case, she continues to prosecute. Willis launched the investigation after her first term and has indicted Trump and 18 others on racketeering charges.
Former Trump Attorney Michael Cohen to Testify in Criminal Trial Over Hush Money Payments

Former Trump Attorney Michael Cohen to Testify in Criminal Trial Over Hush Money Payments

Broke On: Friday, 10 May 2024 Former President Trump's former attorney, Michael Cohen, is set to testify next week in the criminal trial over hush money payments made during the 2016 campaign to silence allegations of extramarital affairs. Cohen paid adult film actress Stormy Daniels and model Karen McDougal, with Trump's company later reimbursing the payments. Trump has pleaded not guilty to falsifying business records. The trial, which began in January 2024, is entering its final stages with both sides presenting closing arguments.
Georgia Court of Appeals to Review Trump's Bid to Disqualify Fani Willis from Election Interference Case

Georgia Court of Appeals to Review Trump's Bid to Disqualify Fani Willis from Election Interference Case

Broke On: Wednesday, 08 May 2024 The Georgia Court of Appeals will review former President Trump's appeal to disqualify Fani Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney, from his criminal election interference case due to allegations of a romantic relationship and financial improprieties. The legal proceedings against Trump stem from allegations that he attempted to overturn Georgia's election results in the 2020 presidential race.
Supreme Court to Decide on Trump's Presidential Immunity in Landmark Case

Supreme Court to Decide on Trump's Presidential Immunity in Landmark Case

Broke On: Wednesday, 24 April 2024 The United States Supreme Court will hear arguments on April 24, 2024, regarding former President Donald Trump's claim of presidential immunity against criminal prosecution for his attempts to overturn the electoral vote count in the 2020 presidential election. The outcome could determine if Trump faces trial on felony counts related to conspiracy and obstruction. Special counsel Jack Smith argues that precedent for absolute immunity does not apply to criminal cases, potentially undermining democratic values.
Supreme Court to Decide on Biden Administration's Regulation of 'Ghost Guns': Implications for Gun Control Laws

Supreme Court to Decide on Biden Administration's Regulation of 'Ghost Guns': Implications for Gun Control Laws

Broke On: Monday, 22 April 2024 The Supreme Court will review the Biden administration's regulations on 'ghost guns,' untraceable firearms that can be assembled at home, with both sides arguing over the interpretation of the Gun Control Act of 1968. The controversy centers around a regulation requiring manufacturers to have serial numbers and keep records, which was struck down but appealed by the Justice Department. Gun rights groups argue this is unconstitutional and could financially harm them.