A tomato that was part of the Veg-05 experiment went missing on the ISS for eight months.
NASA astronaut Frank Rubio, who holds the record for the longest spaceflight by an American, was jokingly accused of eating the missing tomato.
The missing tomato was found during a livestream event celebrating the 25th anniversary of the ISS.
A tomato that had been missing for eight months on the International Space Station (ISS) has been found, putting an end to a humorous saga that had become an inside joke among the crew. The tomato was part of the Veg-05 experiment, an initiative aimed at growing fresh food in space. It was lost by NASA astronaut Frank Rubio in March 2023, shortly after the harvest.
Rubio, who holds the record for the longest spaceflight by an American, had been jokingly accused of eating the missing tomato. However, during a livestream event celebrating the 25th anniversary of the ISS, astronaut Jasmin Moghbeli revealed that the tomato had been found, exonerating Rubio.
The incident underscores the challenges of conducting experiments in a microgravity environment. Despite these challenges, the Veg-05 experiment managed to produce a dozen ripe tomatoes. However, the missing tomato likely shriveled and desiccated over the months due to the conditions on the ISS.
Rubio's year-long mission in space was marked by overwhelming support from his community. His return to Earth was celebrated, and the discovery of the missing tomato adds a humorous footnote to his historic mission.
Confidence
100%
No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication
Sources
97%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
80%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
The incident became an inside joke for Rubio, who spent hours searching for it.
Rubio's year-long mission in space was difficult, but he received overwhelming support from his community.
Accuracy No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
96%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
Rubio, who held the record for the longest spaceflight by an American, was accused of eating the tomato while aboard the International Space Station.
Accuracy No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
96%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
The experiment faced challenges, resulting in only a dozen ripe tomatoes being produced.
Accuracy No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
96%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
The tomato likely shriveled and desiccated in the microgravity environment.
Accuracy No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
95%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Accuracy No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication