On March 27, 2024, a terrorist attack occurred in Moscow that killed at least 139 people. The Islamic State group claimed responsibility for the assault and shared video evidence of the attack on social media. Russian President Vladimir Putin has baselessly accused Ukraine of being involved in the attack and has doubled down on this claim despite lack of evidence. Russia's Investigative Committee published a list identifying 143 people confirmed dead so far, but there are still reports missing persons since Friday. The victims were killed by inhaling smoke from the fire that was caused by gunmen storming Crocus City Hall and shooting civilians at point blank with assault weapons before setting the building on fire. Thousands of people had traveled to watch Soviet-era rock group Picnic, which is why there are so many missing persons reports. The attack has led to a tightening of security in Belarus as well.
139 Killed in Moscow Terrorist Attack; Russia Accuses Ukraine Despite Lack of Evidence
Moscow, Russia Russian FederationOn March 27, 2024, a terrorist attack occurred in Moscow that killed at least 139 people. The Islamic State group claimed responsibility for the assault and shared video evidence of the attack on social media.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has baselessly accused Ukraine of being involved in the attack despite lack of evidence.
Confidence
70%
Doubts
- It is unclear if the Russian government has any concrete evidence to support its accusations against Ukraine.
Sources
64%
Ukraine war updates: Russia says it's 'hard to believe' Islamic State group behind terror attack; death toll rises to 140
CNBC News Holly Ellyatt, Wednesday, 27 March 2024 08:34Unique Points
- Russia's Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova said it's 'extremely hard to believe' that the Islamic State (IS) militant group would be able to launch an attack like the one that occurred in Moscow last Friday, where 143 died
- Russia was rocked last week by the deadliest terror attack on its soil in two decades, when gunmen stormed Crocus City Hall on the outskirts of Moscow, shooting civilians at point blank with assault weapons before setting the building on fire.
- Thousands of people had traveled to the venue to watch Soviet-era rock group Picnic.
- Russian social media channels have since been filled with appeals from friends and relatives to help find the victims still missing.
Accuracy
- Russia's Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova said it's 'extremely hard to believe' that the Islamic State (IS) militant group would be able to launch an attack like the one that occurred in Moscow last Friday, where 140 died
- Zakharova is among senior Russian officials claiming that Western countries and Ukraine were behind the Crocus City Hall attack, despite Islamic State saying it had carried out the massacre.
Deception (30%)
The article contains multiple examples of deceptive practices. Firstly, the sentence 'Russia sentences Pussy Riot activist to six years in absentia for Ukraine ≠war fakes≡' is misleading as it implies that Lyusya Shtein was found guilty of spreading false information about Russia's army. However, the sentence does not specify what exactly she was accused of and there is no evidence presented to support this claim. Secondly, the statement 'At least one dead, 12 wounded in strikes on Ukraine's Kharkiv, mayor says- At least one dead, 12 wounded in strikes on Ukraine's Kharkiv, mayor says
- Russia sentences Pussy Riot activist to six years in absentia for Ukraine ≠war fakes≡
Fallacies (75%)
The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when the Russian court sentences Pussy Riot activist Lyusya Shtein in absentia for anti-war social media posts. This is a violation of due process and should not be considered as evidence against her guilt or innocence. Additionally, there are several instances where the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing Russian strikes on Ukraine's Kharkiv, such as- Russia sentences Pussy Riot activist to six years in absentia for anti-war social media posts
- At least one dead and 12 wounded in the latest Russian strikes on Ukraine's Kharkiv
Bias (85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'hard to believe' when discussing Russia's claim that Islamic State was behind a terrorist attack in Moscow. This is an example of religious bias as it implies that Islam is inherently violent and extremist, which may not be true for all Muslims or even IS members.- At least one dead, 12 wounded in strikes on Ukraine's Kharkiv, mayor says
- It's extremely hard to believe IS carried out Moscow attack, Russia says
- Russia sentences Pussy Riot activist to six years in absentia for Ukraine 'war fakes'
Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest in this article. The author is Holly Ellyatt and Sophie Kiderlin who have a financial stake in the company that owns CNBC.- Holly Ellyatt and Sophie Kiderlin work for CNBC, which has a financial stake in Russia.
Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
The author of this article has a potential conflict of interest regarding the topic of Islamic State group. The author is Holly Ellyatt and Sophie Kiderlin, who are both journalists for CNBC. They may have professional affiliations with Western countries or Ukraine that could influence their reporting on the issue. For example, they may be members of organizations that support human rights or democracy in these regions, which could affect their objectivity when covering events related to Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the terror attack in Moscow.- Holly Ellyatt and Sophie Kiderlin say it's 'extremely hard to believe' Islamic State group behind Moscow blast
- Lyusya Shtein, a Pussy Riot activist and critic of Putin, sentenced in absentia to six years for Ukraine 'war fakes'
- Russia says it's 'hard to believe' IS militants could launch such an attack, as death toll rises to 140
74%
Putin sees Kyiv in Moscow terrorist attack. But ISIS is its own story.
The Fixing Site: A Summary of the Article. Ishaan Tharoor Wednesday, 27 March 2024 04:00Unique Points
- Russian President Vladimir Putin is still intent on pointing the finger at Kyiv for a terrorist attack in Moscow that killed 139 people.
- The Islamic State group claimed responsibility for the assault, but Kremlin officials continue to gesture to their more immediate enemy - Ukraine's government which has resisted Russia's full-scale invasion for over two years.
Accuracy
- Putin and his allies need to keep the domestic focus on the perfidy of their enemies next door as they staked much of their credibility and political future on the war in Ukraine.
Deception (70%)
The author Ishaan Tharoor does not make any assertions in this article. He only reports on the statements made by others and provides context for those statements. The main deception in this article comes from Russian President Vladimir Putin's attempts to blame Ukraine for a terrorist attack that was carried out by ISIS-K, an offshoot of the Islamic State based in Pakistan and Afghanistan.- Putin acknowledged in a televised government meeting Monday evening, before taking an angrier, conspiratorial turn. “We know that the crime was committed by radical Islamists,” Putin said. “But we also know that the U.S. via various channels tries to persuade their satellites and other countries that, according to their intel, there is allegedly no Kyiv trace in the Moscow terrorist attack and that it was carried out by members of ISIS.”
- Putin went on to say. “This atrocity may be just a link in a whole series of attempts by those who have been at war with our country since 2014 by the hands of the neo-Nazi Kyiv regime.”
Fallacies (85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when Putin claims that the U.S. via various channels tries to persuade their satellites and other countries that ISIS is responsible for the Moscow terrorist attack, despite evidence suggesting otherwise.- ][Putin] acknowledged in a televised government meeting Monday evening, before taking an angrier, conspiratorial turn. “We also know that the U.S. via various channels tries to persuade their satellites and other countries that, according to their intel, there is allegedly no Kyiv trace in the Moscow terrorist attack and that it was carried out by members of ISIS.”
- Russian authorities have seized four suspects implicated in the attack. All are nationals from Tajikistan who were in the country as migrant workers.
Bias (85%)
The author of the article is Ishaan Tharoor and he has a history of bias against Russia. He consistently portrays Putin as an aggressive leader who seeks to expand his power by any means necessary. In this particular article, Tharoor uses language that dehumanizes Russian citizens and implies that they are complicit in the terrorist attack on their own country.- Putin went on to say. “This atrocity may be just a link in a whole series of attempts by those who have been at war with our country since 2014 by the hands of the neo-Nazi Kyiv regime.”
- Russian authorities have seized four suspects implicated in the attack. All are nationals from Tajikistan who were in the country as migrant workers.
Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
67%
Russian investigators receive more than 100 missing person reports after Moscow concert hall attack
CNN News Site: In-Depth Reporting and Analysis with Some Financial Conflicts and Sensational Language Christian Edwards, Wednesday, 27 March 2024 19:16Unique Points
- Russia's Investigative Committee on Wednesday published a list of names identifying the 143 people confirmed dead so far.
- Investigators had also received 143 reports of missing people since Friday.
- Many of the victims are thought to have been killed by inhaling smoke from the fire.
- ISIS claimed responsibility for the attack and shared a video by the men as they stormed the building, where thousands of Russians had arrived to watch Picnic.
- Russian President Vladimir Putin has baselessly claimed that Ukraine was in some way responsible for the attack.
- Senior Kremlin figures have doubled down on this accusation.
- Ukraine has vehemently denied these claims.
Accuracy
- It is not clear how many of the people reported missing are accounted for in the confirmed death toll.
- Russia was rocked last week by the deadliest terror attack on its soil in two decades, when gunmen stormed Crocus City Hall on the outskirts of Moscow, shooting civilians at point blank with assault weapons before setting the building on fire.
- Thousands of people had traveled to the venue to watch Soviet-era rock group Picnic.
- Russian social media channels have since been filled with appeals from friends and relatives to help find the victims still missing.
- In his first national address after the attack 19 hours after it began, Putin on Saturday claimed without evidence that a window had been prepared for the attackers to escape to Ukraine.
- Senior Kremlin figures have doubled down on this accusation.
- Ukraine has vehemently denied these claims.
- Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, one of Putin's most loyal allies, contradicted Putin's claim that the attackers had bolted for Ukraine.
- He said the gunmen tried initially to flee to Belarus and only headed for Ukraine after realizing that Belarus had tightened its security.
- Russia has so far arrested 11 men in connection with the attack.
- Four of these suspects, all citizens of Tajikistan, appeared battered and bruised in a Moscow court on Sunday.
- One was unresponsive and another had his ear cut off and stuffed into his mouth.
- Videos shared widely on Russian social media showed some of the men being violently interrogated.
- One video also appeared to show electrocution.
Deception (50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title mentions that Russian investigators have received more than 100 missing person reports after the Moscow concert hall attack. However, this information is not supported by any evidence presented in the article and it's unclear how many of these people are accounted for in the confirmed death toll. Secondly, there are several instances where statements from sources or quotes from victims are used to support a narrative that contradicts what has been previously stated. For example, earlier in the article investigators had said they had also received 143 reports of missing people since Friday and yet later it is mentioned that Russia's Investigative Committee on Wednesday published a list of names identifying the 143 people confirmed dead so far. This creates confusion as to whether there are more than 143 deaths or not. Thirdly, the article uses sensationalism by mentioning that this could be higher than the previously stated death toll and then goes on to describe gruesome details such as bodies being seen with blood and fire raging above which is meant to shock readers.- The final death toll from the Moscow concert hall attack last week could be higher than the 143 confirmed dead, as Russian investigators said they have received more than 100 reports of missing people.
- In his first national address after the attack – 19 hours after it began – Putin on Saturday claimed, without evidence, that a “window” had been prepared for the attackers to escape to Ukraine.
- Many of the victims are thought to have been killed by inhaling smoke from the fire. While the roof was still burning, ISIS claimed responsibility for the attack and shared a video by
- Russia was rocked last week by the deadliest terror attack on its soil in two decades, when gunmen stormed Crocus City Hall on the outskirts of Moscow, shooting civilians at point blank with assault weapons before setting the building on fire.
- Despite ISIS sharing video evidence, Russian President Vladimir Putin has baselessly claimed that Ukraine was in some way responsible for the attack.
Fallacies (70%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the Russian Investigative Committee as a source of information without providing any context or evidence for their claims. Additionally, the author quotes individuals who are not experts in their field and therefore may not have reliable knowledge about the situation they are discussing.- Russia's Investigative Committee on Wednesday published a list of names identifying the 143 people confirmed dead so far.
Bias (85%)
The article contains multiple examples of religious bias. The author uses the phrase 'Russia was rocked last week by the deadliest terror attack on its soil in two decades' which implies that Russia is a victim and not responsible for any actions leading up to this event. Additionally, when discussing ISIS claiming responsibility for the attack, it is stated as fact without providing evidence or context.- Russia was rocked last week by the deadliest terror attack on its soil in two decades
- The author implies that Russia is a victim and not responsible for any actions leading up to this event.
Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication