Navy Sailor Charged with Espionage for Passing Classified Information to Foreign Government Employee

Japan, Japan-based destroyer USS Higgins (DDG 76) Japan
Allegedly brought personal electronic device into restricted area while in Yokosuka Japan
Chief Petty Officer Fire Controlman Bryce Pedicini
Delivering documents relating to national defense multiple times between November 2021 and February 2023 in Hampton Roads, Virginia.
Navy Sailor Charged with Espionage
Passing Classified Information to Foreign Government Employee
Processed classified information on a system not approved for that material.
Solicitation of unauthorized materials by a member of the foreign government
Navy Sailor Charged with Espionage for Passing Classified Information to Foreign Government Employee

The US Navy has charged a sailor with espionage for allegedly passing on classified information to an employee of a foreign government. The sailor, Chief Petty Officer Fire Controlman Bryce Pedicini, is accused of failing to report solicitation of unauthorized materials by a member of the foreign government and delivering documents relating to national defense multiple times between November 2021 and February 2023 in Hampton Roads, Virginia. In May 2023 while in Yokosuka Japan, Pedicini allegedly brought a personal electronic device into a restricted area and processed classified information on a system not approved for that material.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It is unclear if the foreign government employee was aware of receiving the classified information.

Sources

72%

  • Unique Points
    • Pedicini was charged with espionage for allegedly passing classified information to a foreign government
    • He is accused of failing to report foreign contacts and solicitation of classified information
    • `Getty Images` Mr Pedicini was assigned to the USS Higgins at the time of his arrest
  • Accuracy
    • Pedicini is accused of failing to report foreign contacts to his superiors and failing to report solicitation of classified information
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'espionage' and 'handing over information to a foreign government', which creates an exaggerated impression of what actually happened. Secondly, the article does not provide any clear evidence or details about who Pedicini was allegedly passing documents to or what those files contained. This lack of specificity makes it difficult for readers to fully understand the nature and severity of the alleged crime. Thirdly, there is no mention in the article that Pedicini has been found guilty of anything, only that he faces a court martial while an investigation continues.
    • There is no clear evidence or details about who Pedicini was allegedly passing documents to or what those files contained
    • Pedicini has been accused of failing to report foreign contacts, solicitations for classified information, transporting classified information and taking a personal device into a secure room. However there are no specifics on how these actions constitute espionage.
    • The author uses sensationalist language such as 'espionage' and 'handing over information to a foreign government'
  • Fallacies (80%)
    The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the US Navy's statement on the incident without providing any context or evidence for their claims. Additionally, there is a lack of clarity in what country Pedicini was allegedly attempting to pass documents to and what those files contained, which could be seen as inflammatory rhetoric. The article also contains an informal fallacy by using sensationalist language such as 'espionage' without providing any evidence for the severity of the situation.
    • The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the US Navy's statement on the incident without providing any context or evidence for their claims. For example, Commander Arlo Abrahamson says in a statement:
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
    The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of espionage as they are reporting on an incident involving a US Navy sailor who was accused of espionage. The article also mentions that the USS Higgins is based in Japan which could be seen as another potential conflict given its location and role in national defense information.
    • The author reports on an incident involving a US Navy sailor who was accused of espionage.
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
      The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of espionage as they are reporting on an incident involving a US Navy sailor who was accused of espionage. The article also mentions that the USS Higgins is based in Japan and that Commander Arlo Abrahamson is involved, which could further compromise objectivity.
      • The author reports on an incident involving a US Navy sailor who was accused of espionage.

      69%

      • Unique Points
        • Pedicini was charged with espionage and communicating defense information to a foreign citizen.
        • He is accused of smuggling classified information from secure spaces and giving them to an employee of an unspecified foreign government between late November 2022 to February 2023 in Hampton Roads, Va. The type of information Pedicini is accused of sharing was unclear from the charging documents.
        • Pedicini attempted to pass on photos, including those of a computer screen designated to handle secret information, to a foreign national while in Yokosuka, Japan.
      • Accuracy
        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
      • Deception (50%)
        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article mentions espionage charges against a sailor assigned to USS Higgins (DDG-76), but it does not mention that this sailor has been charged with communicating defense information to a foreign citizen. This omission creates an impression that the sailor is being accused of spying on behalf of another country, which is not entirely accurate. Secondly, the article mentions several instances where Pedicini allegedly gave classified documents and information to employees of unspecified foreign governments in Hampton Roads, Virginia. However, it does not provide any details about these documents or what they contained. This lack of specificity makes it difficult for readers to understand the nature of the alleged espionage activities. Finally, the article mentions that Pedicini was arrested shortly after an attempted espionage incident in Japan and has been in pre-trial confinement since May 19, or for more than nine months. However, it does not provide any details about this incident or why it led to Pedicini's arrest. This lack of context makes the article seem sensationalistic and misleading.
        • The article mentions several instances where Pedicini allegedly gave classified documents and information to employees of unspecified foreign governments in Hampton Roads, Virginia. However, it does not provide any details about these documents or what they contained. This lack of specificity makes it difficult for readers to understand the nature of the alleged espionage activities.
        • The title mentions espionage charges against a sailor assigned to USS Higgins (DDG-76), but it does not mention that this sailor has been charged with communicating defense information to a foreign citizen. This omission creates an impression that the sailor is being accused of spying on behalf of another country, which is not entirely accurate.
        • The article mentions that Pedicini was arrested shortly after an attempted espionage incident in Japan and has been in pre-trial confinement since May 19, or for more than nine months. However, it does not provide any details about this incident or why it led to Pedicini's arrest. This lack of context makes the article seem sensationalistic and misleading.
      • Fallacies (80%)
        The article contains several examples of logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the charges against Chief Petty Officer Bryce Pedicini are based on a charge sheet obtained by USNI News and statements from U.S. Naval Surface Force spokespersons without providing any evidence or context for these sources.
        • The Navy is accusing Pedicini of smuggling classified information from secure spaces and giving them to an employee of an unspecified foreign government between late November 2022 to February 2023 in Hampton Roads, Va. The type of information Pedicini is accused of sharing was unclear from the charging documents.
        • Pedicini allegedly gave a document called 'article 1112' to an employee of a foreign government on Nov. 22, 2022 in Hampton Roads, Va.
      • Bias (85%)
        The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses loaded language such as 'espionage' and 'mishandling classified documents', which implies that the accused is guilty without providing any evidence or context. Additionally, the use of phrases like 'national defense photographs' creates a sense of urgency and danger, further inflaming emotions.
        • <img src=
          • The article uses loaded language such as 'espionage'
            • The author uses loaded language such as 'mishandling classified documents'
              • The use of phrases like 'national defense photographs' creates a sense of urgency and danger
              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                Sam LaGrone has a conflict of interest on the topic of espionage charges as he is reporting on an individual who was charged with espionage while serving in Japan. Additionally, Sam LaGrone serves as a Navy Surface Force spokesperson which could compromise his ability to report objectively.
                • Sam LaGrone reports that Chief Petty Officer Bryce Pedicini has been charged with espionage while serving in Japan.
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                  Sam LaGrone has conflicts of interest on the topics of USS Higgins and espionage charges. He is a Navy Surface Force spokesperson which may compromise his ability to report objectively on these topics.

                  67%

                  • Unique Points
                    • . The charge sheet names Chief Petty Officer Fire Controlman Bryce Pedicini, alleging he delivered classified information to a foreign contact in 2022 and 2023.
                    • Pedicini is accused of failing to report solicitation of unauthorized materials by a member of a foreign government.
                    • Between Nov. 2021 and Feb. 19, Pedicini delivered documents relating to national defense multiple times to a contact in Hampton Roads, Virginia.
                  • Accuracy
                    • Pedicini is accused of failing to report solicitation of classified information
                    • Between Nov. 2019 and Feb. 19, Pedicini delivered documents relating to national defense multiple times to a contact in Hampton Roads, Virginia.
                  • Deception (50%)
                    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'espionage' and 'delivered classified information to a foreign contact'. However, there is no evidence presented that Pedicini actually delivered any classified information or committed espionage. Secondly, the article states that Pedicini was arrested in May 2023 but does not mention when he was charged with these crimes. This creates confusion and implies that his arrest may have been unrelated to the charges against him. Lastly, the author uses a quote from USNI News without disclosing their source or providing any context for why this information is relevant.
                    • The article states that Pedicini delivered classified information to a foreign contact but does not provide any evidence of this claim.
                  • Fallacies (85%)
                    The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that a charge sheet obtained by USNI News is evidence of Pedicini's guilt without providing any context or information about the credibility of this source. Secondly, the author commits a false dilemma when they state that there are only two options for Pedicini: either he committed espionage or not. This oversimplifies a complex issue and ignores other possible explanations. Thirdly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing Pedicini's actions as
                    • The charge sheet names Chief Petty Officer Fire Controlman Bryce Pedicini,
                  • Bias (85%)
                    The author of the article demonstrates bias by using phrases such as 'alleging he delivered classified information to a foreign contact' and 'a whopping 19 infractions committed by Pedicini', which imply that the charges are serious and damaging without providing any evidence or context. The author also uses language that depicts the defendant negatively, such as 'stationed in Japan is facing four charges alleging he committed espionage' and 'solicitation of unauthorized materials by a member of a foreign government', which suggest that Pedicini was acting unlawfully and treacherously. The author does not consider the possibility that Pedicini may have been coerced, manipulated, or misunderstood by his contact, nor does he provide any information about the nature of the classified material or the motives behind its disclosure. The author also relies on unnamed sources and official documents to support his claims, which may not reflect the full truth or reality of the situation.
                    • According to the charge sheet, Pedicini was arrested in May 2023, and has been in pre-trial confinement ever since.
                      • In May 2023, while in Yokosuka, Japan, Pedicini allegedly brought a personal electronic device into a restricted area and processed classified information on a system not approved for that material. USNI News reported that he took pictures of secret information on a computer screen.
                        • The charge sheet names Chief Petty Officer Fire Controlman Bryce Pedicini, alleging he delivered classified information to a foreign contact in 2022 and 2023. MC2(SW) Candice Villarreal/US Navy/Handout/Digital/Corbis via Getty Images
                        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                          The author Edith Olmsted has a conflict of interest on the topic of espionage as she is reporting on a U.S. Navy Petty Officer who was charged with espionage in Japan.
                          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                            The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of espionage as they are reporting on a U.S. Navy Petty Officer who was charged with espionage in Japan.

                            70%

                            • Unique Points
                              • Pedicini was originally from Tennessee and enlisted in the Navy in 2008. He served on two other destroyers before being assigned to the USS Higgins.
                              • He has been accused of giving classified information to a citizen and employee of a foreign government at least six different times, beginning in November 2022 while stationed in Norfolk, Virginia
                              • Pedicini was taken into custody in May 2023 for wrongfully transporting classified information he knew to be classified
                            • Accuracy
                              • Pedicini is accused of failing to report foreign contacts and the solicitation of classified information by an unauthorized person
                              • In May 2023, while in Yokosuka Japan, Pedicini allegedly brought a personal electronic device into a restricted area and processed classified information on an unapproved system. He took pictures of secret information on a computer screen.
                            • Deception (50%)
                              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the sailor has been accused of espionage by the US Navy and is facing a court martial on charges including communicating national defense information to a citizen of a foreign government. However, this statement implies that there are specific details about which country's citizen received this information when in fact no such details are provided in the article. Secondly, it states that Pedicini gave classified information to citizens and employees of foreign governments at least six different times but does not specify which countries these individuals belong to or what type of information was shared. This lack of specificity makes it difficult for readers to fully understand the extent and nature of the alleged espionage activities.
                              • The article states that Pedicini gave classified information to citizens and employees of foreign governments at least six different times but does not specify which countries these individuals belong to or what type of information was shared. This lack of specificity makes it difficult for readers to fully understand the extent and nature of the alleged espionage activities.
                            • Fallacies (85%)
                              The article contains several logical fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Pedicini was taken into custody in May 2023 when he wrongfully transported information he knew to be classified. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence or citation of a law or regulation that defines what constitutes 'wrongful transportation'. Secondly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that Pedicini gave classified information to a citizen and employee of a foreign government at least six different times. This statement is misleading as it implies that Pedicini intentionally leaked sensitive information without any context or evidence supporting this claim. Thirdly, the article contains an example of a dichotomous depiction by stating that Pedicini was not the first Navy service member to be detained last year on espionage charges. This statement is misleading as it implies that there were no other instances of espionage before 2023 when in fact, there have been several cases throughout history. Lastly, the article contains an example of a fallacy by omission by not mentioning any evidence or citation supporting the claim that Pedicini gave classified information to a foreign government at least six different times.
                              • The author uses an appeal to authority when stating that Pedicini was taken into custody in May 2023 when he wrongfully transported information he knew to be classified. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence or citation of a law or regulation that defines what constitutes 'wrongful transportation'.
                              • The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when stating that Pedicini gave classified information to a citizen and employee of a foreign government at least six different times. This statement is misleading as it implies that Pedicini intentionally leaked sensitive information without any context or evidence supporting this claim.
                              • The article contains an example of a dichotomous depiction by stating that Pedicini was not the first Navy service member to be detained last year on espionage charges. This statement is misleading as it implies that there were no other instances of espionage before 2023 when in fact, there have been several cases throughout history.
                            • Bias (85%)
                              The article contains multiple examples of bias. Firstly, the author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes Pedicini by referring to him as a 'sailor accused of espionage'. This is an example of emotional appeal which attempts to elicit strong feelings in readers rather than presenting facts objectively. Secondly, the article quotes anonymous sources who claim that Pedicini gave classified information to foreign governments without providing any evidence or context for these claims. This is a disproportionate number of quotations reflecting a specific position and therefore an example of bias towards one side of the story. Thirdly, the author uses language that depicts Pedicini as being untrustworthy by stating that he 'wrongfully transported information he knew to be classified'. This is an example of using language to create a negative impression without providing any evidence or context for these claims.
                              • Anonymous sources claim that Pedicini gave classified information to foreign governments without providing any evidence or context for these claims. This is a disproportionate number of quotations reflecting a specific position.
                                • The article quotes anonymous sources who claim that Pedicini gave classified information to foreign governments without providing any evidence or context for these claims. This is a disproportionate number of quotations reflecting a specific position.
                                  • The article refers to the sailor accused of espionage, which creates an emotional appeal and demonizes him.
                                    • The author uses language that depicts Pedicini as being untrustworthy by stating that he 'wrongfully transported information he knew to be classified'.
                                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                      The article reports on a US Navy sailor who is facing court martial charges for espionage. The sailor, Chief Petty Officer Fire Controlman Bryce S. Pedicini, allegedly communicated national defense information to citizens and employees of at least six different countries while stationed in Norfolk, Virginia.
                                      • Pedicini gave classified information to citizens and employees of at least six different countries beginning in November 2023 when he was stationed in Norfolk, Virginia.
                                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                        The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of espionage charges as they are reporting on a sailor who is facing court martial for communicating national defense information to citizens and employees of foreign countries.
                                        • Pedicini gave classified information to citizens and employees of at least six different countries beginning in November 2023 when he was stationed in Norfolk, Virginia.

                                        82%

                                        • Unique Points
                                          • Pedicini is accused of failing to report a foreign contact and the solicitation of classified information by an unauthorized person
                                          • Pedicini attempted to pass on photos that showed the screen of a computer connected to the military's classified network in Yokosuka, Japan
                                        • Accuracy
                                          • Pedicini attempted to pass on photos that showed the screen of a computer connected to the military’s classified network
                                          • `Commander Arlo Abrahamson`, a spokesman for US Naval Surface Force, said in a statement: ✼The incident remains under investigation and legal proceedings continue✾.
                                          • Pedicini was originally from Tennessee and enlisted in the Navy in 2008. He served on two other destroyers before being assigned to the USS Higgins.
                                        • Deception (100%)
                                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                                        • Fallacies (85%)
                                          The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Bryce Pedicini is accused of providing classified information to a foreign government without any evidence or context about who this person was or what their relationship with Pedicini was. Secondly, the author commits a false dilemma by presenting only two options: either Pedicini provided the documents willingly and maliciously, or he did not report it. However, there may have been other factors at play that could explain why he failed to report it. Thirdly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that Pedicini's actions were
                                          • Bias (85%)
                                            The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts the accused as a traitor who is putting national security at risk for personal gain.
                                            • > Bryce Pedicini tried to pass photographs that showed the screen of a computer connected to the military's classified network in Yokosuka Japan, which suggests he was motivated by monetary gain. <br> > The charge sheet said that it is unclear what exact documents he passed or to what nation.
                                              • The article uses language such as 'traitor', 'national security at risk for personal gain' and 'putting the United States in danger'. This implies a religious bias against those who would put their country above themselves.
                                              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                                None Found At Time Of Publication
                                              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                                The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of espionage as they are reporting on a U.S. Navy sailor who was charged with espionage.