Nvidia vs AMD: Who's Ahead in the AI Chip Race? A Look at Their Market Performance and Innovations

San Jose or Santa Clara, California, USA United States of America
AMD may be undervalued with a lower price-to-book ratio.
Both Nvidia and AMD have released new AI chips: Grace Hopper for Nvidia, AMD Instinct MI300 for AMD.
Nvidia and AMD are leading companies in the AI chip market.
Nvidia has a larger market cap gains than S&P 500 this year.
Nvidia vs AMD: Who's Ahead in the AI Chip Race? A Look at Their Market Performance and Innovations

The tech industry is experiencing a surge in growth, particularly in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Two tech giants, Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), are at the forefront of this revolution. While Nvidia has been leading the charge with its advanced AI chips and strong market presence, AMD is not far behind.

According to recent reports, Nvidia's market cap gains account for over a third (34.5%) of the S&P 500's market cap gains this year. The company has been praised for its fundamental growth and strong earnings, despite trading at a high valuation of 44x forward earnings.

However, AMD is not to be underestimated. Its price-to-book value ratio is significantly lower than Nvidia's, indicating that it may be undervalued compared to its competitors. Furthermore, AMD has a history of catching up and even surpassing competitors in the tech industry.

In the AI chip market, both companies are making strides. Nvidia released its Grace Hopper architecture last year, while AMD introduced its AMD Instinct MI300 chips. According to some reports, AMD's chips may outperform Nvidia's in certain areas.

The tech industry is known for its rapid pace of innovation and competition. It remains to be seen which company will come out on top in the AI chip market. What is clear, however, is that both Nvidia and AMD are making significant contributions to the field of AI and are driving growth in the tech sector.

Despite the excitement surrounding these companies, it's important for investors to approach this market with caution. The stock market has seen its fair share of bubbles in the past, including during the dot-com era. Analogies like 'this is just like the dotcom bubble' may give a false sense of control and predictability, but each situation is unique.

As always, it's crucial to stay informed and consider multiple sources when making investment decisions. The S&P 500 index, which includes both Nvidia and AMD, provides a diverse representation of the broader market.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

90%

Doubts
  • The reports on AMD's chips outperforming Nvidia's are not peer-reviewed.
  • The stock market comparison may not accurately reflect the companies' future performance.

Sources

94%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Nvidia alone accounts for more than a third of the S&P 500’s gains this year—and it’s a big risk for investors, top economist warns

Yahoo Finance Jason Ma Saturday, 15 June 2024 23:49
  • Unique Points
    • Nvidia's market cap gains account for 34.5% of the S&P 500's market cap gains this year.
    • Nvidia plans to upgrade its AI accelerators every year, with new platforms announced for 2025 and 2026.
  • Accuracy
    • Nvidia's market cap gains account for 34.5% of the S&P 500’s market cap gains this year.
    • Nvidia's stock has soared 166% in the year to date and is up more than 200% from a year ago.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

95%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

I'm Not Saying Things Aren't Crazy

The Irrelevant Investor Michael Batnick Saturday, 15 June 2024 23:53
  • Unique Points
    • People use analogies because it gives them the illusion of control and comforting predictions like 'this is just like the dotcom bubble' are more common than admitting uncertainty.
    • The Nvidia stock valuation is not considered insane due to its strong fundamental growth, despite trading at 44x forward earnings which isn’t cheap.
  • Accuracy
    • From 1995-1999, 108 stocks in the S&P 500 doubled, with 39 of them doubling in 1999 alone.
    • Nvidia's market cap gains account for 34.5% of the S&P 500’s market cap gains this year.
    • From 2020 through today, 32 stocks gained a 100% return in a year, with 12 of those gaining it in 2021.
    • Nvidia's stock has soared 166% in the year to date and is up more than 200% from a year ago.
    • In 1999, Cisco reached a high of 97x forward earnings in comparison to Nvidia’s current valuation.
    • Nvidia dominates the AI chip market with impressive revenue growth.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (95%)
    The author is making comparisons between the current stock market and the dotcom bubble of the late 1990s. This is an example of a hasty generalization fallacy as he is drawing conclusions based on similarities rather than considering all relevant information. He also mentions that some valuations are high, but then compares them to extreme examples from the past and declares they are not insane. This is an appeal to ignorance fallacy as he assumes that because something is not as extreme as a past example, it must be reasonable. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing the stock market as 'manic' and 'crazy'.
    • This is not the 1990s stock market... The only thing they all have in common is that they end, eventually.
    • The Nvidia thing is crazy, but it’s not insane.
    • The stock trades at 44x forward earnings, which isn’t cheap, but it’s nothing compared to Cisco in 1999...
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

74%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Could This Veteran Technology Company Unseat Nvidia in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Dominance?

Yahoo Finance Will Healy, Saturday, 15 June 2024 23:54
  • Unique Points
    • AMD's price-to-book value ratio is less than one-tenth of Nvidia’s
    • AMD has a history of catching and sometimes surpassing competitors
  • Accuracy
    • Nvidia dominates the AI chip market with impressive revenue growth
    • AMD struggled with declining revenue in recent quarters, but data center segment revenue grew from 24% to 43% of overall revenue between Q1 of fiscal 2023 and Q1 of fiscal 2025
  • Deception (30%)
    The article contains selective reporting and emotional manipulation. The author highlights AMD's struggles in the past quarters while downplaying Nvidia's impressive revenue growth. He also uses phrases like 'admittedly' and 'nonetheless' to create an emotional connection with the reader, implying that AMD is an underdog worth rooting for. Furthermore, he mentions AMD's history of closing technological leads quickly without providing any concrete evidence or recent data to support this claim.
    • At first glance, AMD does not appear to stand a chance against Nvidia’s dominance.
    • However, AMD has a history of catching and sometimes surpassing its competitors,
    • Admittedly, Nvidia has successfully defined itself as the essential AI chip company in the minds of investors,
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The author uses an appeal to authority fallacy by citing independent assessments and AMD's history of closing technological leads as reasons to wait for AMD's chip releases before drawing conclusions about the size of Nvidia's technical lead. Additionally, the author makes a dichotomous depiction by stating that AMD is unlikely to supplant Nvidia in the AI chip market anytime soon but could have a better chance at challenging its dominance than investors anticipate.
    • ]The independent assessments appeared to outperform Nvidia in some niches of the GPU market.[
    • AMD has a history of catching and sometimes surpassing its competitors, and investors should not dismiss AMD's chances of closing the gap in the AI chip race.
  • Bias (95%)
    The author expresses a neutral perspective towards both AMD and Nvidia in the article. However, there are some instances where the author implies that AMD has a chance to challenge Nvidia's dominance in the AI chip market. This can be seen as a slight bias towards AMD, but it is not extreme or unreasonable. The author also mentions AMD's history of closing technological leads quickly and its lower valuation compared to Nvidia as reasons why investors might consider investing in AMD instead of Nvidia.
    • ]AMD has a history of catching and sometimes surpassing its competitors,[
      • With data center growth approaching triple digits and a price-to-book value ratio less than one-tenth of Nvidia's, AMD stock could soar if AI chip sales remain strong.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication