Nvidia's Stock Split and Bullish Price Target Hikes: Analysts Anticipate Significant Sales Opportunities from Sovereign Nations in 2025

San Jose, California United States of America
Analysts believe sovereign nations buying Nvidia's AI chips will accelerate significantly in 2025.
Nvidia began trading after a 10-for-1 stock split on June 10, 2024.
Three Wall Street analysts - Barclays, Susquehanna Financial Group, and TD Cowen - raised their price targets for Nvidia stock.
Nvidia's Stock Split and Bullish Price Target Hikes: Analysts Anticipate Significant Sales Opportunities from Sovereign Nations in 2025

Nvidia, a leading player in the accelerated computing market, began trading after its 10-for-1 stock split on June 10, 2024. The graphics chip leader received price-target hikes from three Wall Street analysts: Barclays, Susquehanna Financial Group, and TD Cowen. These firms believe that Nvidia's sales opportunity from sovereign nations buying its AI chips will accelerate significantly next year.

Barclays analyst Tom O’Malley raised his price target on Nvidia stock to 145 from a split-adjusted 120, reiterating his overweight rating. He sees incremental sales from sovereign nations as a significant market opportunity for Nvidia.

Susquehanna Financial Group analyst Christopher Rolland upped his price target on Nvidia stock to 145 from 120 on a split-adjusted basis, maintaining his positive rating. He is confident in the smooth transition to B100 AI processors for data centers in the second half of 2024.

TD Cowen analyst Matthew Ramsay maintained his buy rating on Nvidia stock and increased his price target to 140 from 120. He sees Nvidia as the leader in accelerated computing.

Despite these bullish predictions, Goldman Sachs downplayed the hype surrounding Nvidia's stock split, viewing its impact as minimal. However, some chip designer may come up with an even better way to be useful in the AI ecosystem and challenge Nvidia's dominance.

Nvidia stock is on several IBD lists: IBD 50, Big Cap 20, Sector Leaders and Tech Leaders. It is also one of the Magnificent Seven stocks.



Confidence

90%

Doubts
  • Goldman Sachs downplayed the hype surrounding Nvidia's stock split, viewing its impact as minimal.
  • It is unclear if any chip designer will challenge Nvidia's dominance in the AI ecosystem.

Sources

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Sovereign nations buying Nvidia’s AI chips presents incremental sales opportunity according to Barclays analyst Tom O’Malley
    • Susquehanna Financial Group raised price target on Nvidia stock to 145 from 120
    • TD Cowen maintained buy rating on Nvidia stock and increased price target to 140 from 120
    • Nvidia is the leader in accelerated computing according to TD Cowen analyst Matthew Ramsay
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

89%

  • Unique Points
    • Nvidia has created a product effective in the build out of generative AI and is used in server farms
    • Some chip designer may come up with an even better way to be useful in the AI ecosystem
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (70%)
    The author expresses her opinion that Nvidia may not always rule AI, implying a lack of certainty about the future. This is an example of editorializing and pontification. She also mentions the possibility of other chip designers coming up with better ways to be useful in the AI ecosystem, which is an example of selective reporting as it only reports details that support her position.
    • I don’t believe that. I believe that the huge margins are going to be attractive. And here’s a crazy idea: maybe some chip designer will come up with an even better way to be useful in the AI ecosystem,
  • Fallacies (90%)
    The author, Seana Smith, makes an argument that Nvidia may not always rule AI by expressing skepticism towards the assumption that Nvidia will continue to dominate the AI landscape indefinitely. This is an example of a fallacy called 'Overgeneralization'. The author also mentions the possibility of other chip designers coming up with better ways to be useful in the AI ecosystem, which implies a recognition that competition exists and could potentially challenge Nvidia's position. However, no explicit appeals to authority or inflammatory rhetoric were detected.
    • I don’t believe that. I believe that the huge margins are going to be attractive. And here’s a crazy idea: maybe some chip designer will come up with an even better way to be useful in the AI ecosystem.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

97%

  • Unique Points
    • Goldman Sachs has downplayed the hype surrounding Nvidia’s stock split.
    • The impact of Nvidia’s stock split is seen as minimal by Goldman Sachs.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication