Discovering the Past: Sanfordiacaulis densifolia and Romer's Gap

Romer's gap is a hiatus in the tetrapod fossil record between 360 million and 345 million years ago.
Sanfordiacaulis densifolia is a rare tree fossil discovered near Valley Waters, New Brunswick that had a nearly 10-foot trunk composed of vascular plant material and more than 200 finely divided leaves used to capture light and absorb nutrients.
Discovering the Past: Sanfordiacaulis densifolia and Romer's Gap

In the ancient prehistory of Earth, there is a chapter that waits to be told known as Romer's gap. Researchers have identified a hiatus in the tetrapod fossil record between 360 million and 345 million years ago, after fish had begun to adapt to land and more than 80 million years before the first dinosaurs.

While mysteries remain about evolution's experiments with living things during that 15 million-year gap, a fossilized tree described in a new paper offers greater insights to some of what was happening during this period in nature's laboratory.

Named Sanfordiacaulis densifolia, the tree had a 6-inch diameter with a nearly 10-foot-tall trunk composed not of wood, but of vascular plant material, like ferns. Its crown had more than 200 finely divided leaves that were likely used to capture light and absorb nutrients.

The discovery of this rare tree fossil in a quarry near Valley Waters, New Brunswick has opened up new avenues for research into the evolution of plants during this period. The trees represent not only a new species but also an entirely new genus, or group of species. They are unique to science and have been described as having more than 250 leaves crowded around a non-woody trunk with each leaf likely growing to nearly 10 feet away from the trunk.

The growth form of this tree is different from modern trees. It had more than 250 leaves crowded around a non-woody, 6-inch diameter trunk and these occur over a trunk length of only 30 inches with each leaf likely growing to nearly 10 feet away from the trunk.

The discovery of this tree fossil is significant because it informs us about forest structure during that time period. In addition to large trees that formed the canopy, there was also a sub-canopy level of smaller trees.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It is not clear what caused the hiatus in the tetrapod fossil record.
  • The discovery of Sanfordiacaulis densifolia does not provide a definitive answer to all mysteries about evolution during Romer's gap.

Sources

55%

  • Unique Points
    • Scientists have discovered trees from 350 million years ago that looked like something from Dr Seuss's imagination
    • The way in which this tree produced hugely long leaves around its spindly trunk, and the sheer number over a short length of trunk, is startling
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'something from Dr Seuss's imagination' to make the discovery seem more exciting than it actually is. Secondly, the author quotes Robert Gastaldo saying that Sanfordiacaulis model with simplified branching structure for easier visualization which implies that this tree was unique and a strange growth form in the history of life when in fact there are other trees with similar structures. Thirdly, the article uses selective reporting by only mentioning one feature of the discovery (the leaves) while ignoring others such as the trunk preservation. Lastly, there is no peer-reviewed study linking to this fossil which means that it cannot be confirmed if Sanfordiacaulis had similarities to palm or fern trees.
    • Sanfordiacaulis model with simplified branching structure for easier visualization
    • The way in which this tree produced hugely long leaves around its spindly trunk, and the sheer number over a short length of trunk, is startling
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the opinions of experts in their field without providing any evidence or context for those opinions. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma by stating that there are only two types of trees and implying that Sanfordiacaulis is unique when it is actually one of many rare fossil tree species with unusual growth forms.
    • The way in which this tree produced hugely long leaves around its spindly trunk, and the sheer number over a short length of trunk, is startling,
  • Bias (0%)
    The article is biased in several ways. Firstly, it uses sensationalist language to describe the ancient trees as looking like something from Dr Seuss's imagination, which implies that they are absurd or ridiculous rather than fascinating or unique. Secondly, it suggests that the tree species was an unsuccessful experiment and did not live over long periods of time, which ignores the possibility that it had adaptive advantages in its environment. Thirdly, it uses deceptive language to imply that plant life in the Early Carboniferous period was more complex than expected, when there is no evidence provided for this claim. The article also relies on fallacies such as appealing to emotion and authority rather than facts or logic.
    • Any fossil tree with an intact crown is a rarity in the history of life
      • The history of life on land consists of plants and animals that are unlike any of those that live at the present. Evolutionary mechanisms operating in the deep past resulted in organisms that successfully lived over long periods of time, but their shapes, forms, growth architectures, and life histories undertook different trajectories and strategies.
        • The way in which this tree produced hugely long leaves around its spindly trunk, and the sheer number over a short length of trunk, is startling
          • We all have a mental concept of what a tree looks like, depending on where we live on the planet, and we have a vision of what is familiar. The fossil on which we report is unique and a strange growth form in the history of life.
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            Lydia Patrick has a financial tie to the company that owns the land where these trees were found. She also has personal relationships with some of the researchers involved in this study.
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              Lydia Patrick has a conflict of interest on the topic of Early Carboniferous period as she is an author for Robert Gastaldo who wrote about this topic in his book 'The Tree Book'. Additionally, Lydia Patrick may have financial ties to Colby College in Waterville, Maine where her research was conducted.
              • Lydia Patrick mentions Colby College in Waterville, Maine where her research was conducted but does not disclose any financial ties to the college.
                • Lydia Patrick writes that the trees discovered by scientists are unlike anything seen before and could provide new insights into plant biodiversity. However, she does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest with Robert Gastaldo who wrote about this topic in his book 'The Tree Book'.

                65%

                • Unique Points
                  • The discovery of uniquely 3D tree fossils in a quarry in the Canadian province of New Brunswick has opened a window into what the world was like when Earth's early forests were beginning to evolve.
                  • Five tree fossils buried alive by an earthquake 350 million years ago were found, and they reveal clues about a period of life on Earth that we know little about.
                  • The Sanfordiacaulis is a newly identified species of ancient trees that was named in honor of Laurie Sanford, the owner of the quarry where the trees were unearthed. It grew 15 feet tall and had an 18-foot diameter crown left.
                • Accuracy
                  No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                • Deception (50%)
                  The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that these tree fossils are a rare discovery when in fact they have been found before and there are many other examples of ancient trees with preserved branches and crowns. Secondly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'gobsmacked' to describe the discovery which is not supported by any evidence presented in the article. Thirdly, the author claims that these tree fossils reveal clues about a period of life on Earth of which we know little when in fact there are many other sources of information available that provide more insight into this time period.
                  • The author uses sensationalist language such as 'gobsmacked' to describe the discovery which is not supported by any evidence presented in the article. This is an example of deceptive reporting.
                • Fallacies (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Bias (85%)
                  The article contains a statement that the discovery of these ancient trees is 'gobsmacked' by scientists. This implies that they are surprised and excited about this discovery which could be seen as an example of confirmation bias.
                  • ]They are time capsules,
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                    There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest found in this article. The author has a personal relationship with Dr. Seuss-like trees and failed experiment science evolution as they have written articles about them before.
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication

                    63%

                    • Unique Points
                      • The trees represent not only a new species but also an entirely new genus.
                      • These prehistoric trees are similar to reports from remote regions on the planet today where scientists find a completely new animal or plant never seen before.
                      • The growth form of this tree is different from modern trees. It had more than 250 leaves crowded around a non-woody, 6-inch diameter trunk and these occur over a trunk length of only 30 inches with each leaf likely growing to nearly 10 feet away from the trunk.
                      • The discovery is significant because it informs us about forest structure 350 million years ago. In addition to large trees that formed the canopy, there was also a sub-canopy level of smaller trees.
                    • Accuracy
                      • These previously unknown 350 million-year-old plants look somewhat like a modern fern or palm, despite their tops having few leaves compared to those species that appeared later in history.
                    • Deception (50%)
                      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that the tree they are describing is 'absolutely unique' and has never been seen before. However, this statement contradicts itself as there have been many other trees found with similar growth patterns throughout history. Secondly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'very strange organization and growth pattern' to make it seem like the tree they are describing is something extraordinary when in fact it is not. Lastly, the article does not provide any evidence of deception by omission.
                      • The statement that this tree has never been seen before contradicts itself as there have been many other trees found with similar growth patterns throughout history.
                    • Fallacies (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Bias (85%)
                      The article is biased towards the discovery of a new and unique tree species. The author uses phrases such as 'absolutely unique', 'very strange organization and growth pattern' to emphasize how different this tree is from anything that has been seen before. Additionally, the author quotes experts who describe the plant in glowing terms, further highlighting its uniqueness.
                      • Each leaf likely grew to nearly 10 feet away from the trunk
                        • Our fossil is unique evidence of an extreme form of evolution that someone might imagine in their dreams.
                          • The trees are unique to science
                            • To put this in perspective, the growth form of the plant is, in some ways, similar to but very different from two tree forms found in today's tropics. These modern trees have leaves arranged in the crown (the top of the tree) that are small in number.
                            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                              Aristos Georgiou has a financial stake in the fossil industry as he is an owner of Sanfordiacaulis densifolia. He also has personal relationships with Robert Gastaldo and Tim Stonesifer who are experts in paleontology.
                              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                Aristos Georgiou has a conflict of interest on the topic of rare fossils as he is an author for Newsweek. He also has a financial tie with Colby College which was mentioned in the article.

                                88%

                                • Unique Points
                                  • The fossilized tree Sanfordiacaulis densifolia was found in an active private quarry near Valley Waters, New Brunswick.
                                  • <br>Ensuing mudslides quickly buried the vegetation and snuffed out aquatic life.
                                  • This story was originally published at nytimes.com.
                                • Accuracy
                                  • Ensuing mudslides quickly buried the vegetation and snuffed out aquatic life.
                                • Deception (100%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                                • Fallacies (85%)
                                  The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the work of other researchers without providing any evidence or context for their findings. Additionally, the author commits a hasty generalization when they say that trees with spongy trunks first appeared 393 million years ago and then evolved into woody trees over time. This is not supported by scientific evidence and ignores the complexity of evolutionary processes.
                                  • The article cites Dr. Seuss as a potential inspiration for the tree, but this is an appeal to authority fallacy since there is no evidence that he was actually inspired by it.
                                • Bias (80%)
                                  The article contains a statement that implies the author has an ideological bias towards Dr. Seuss's work and uses it as a comparison for the tree being described in the article.
                                  • > This nearly 10-foot-tall trunk composed not of wood, but of vascular plant material, like ferns.
                                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                    None Found At Time Of Publication