Scarlett Johansson and Channing Tatum Star in New Movie

New York City, New York, USA United States of America
Scarlett Johansson and Channing Tatum recently starred in a movie.
Scarlett Johansson and Channing Tatum Star in New Movie

Scarlett Johansson and Channing Tatum recently worked together in the movie



Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Scarlett Johansson attended the Fly Me To The Moon afterparty held at the Rainbow Room in NYC on Monday night, wearing a bright orange silk dress.
    • ,
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Scarlett Johansson and Channing Tatum worked together in the movie ‘Fly Me to the Moon’,
    • Johansson described Tatum as charismatic, easygoing, and loveable.
    • Tatum is a NASA official in the movie, while Johansson plays a marketing executive.
    • The two have previously worked together in ‘Don Jon’ and ‘Hail, Caesar!’, but this is their first film with shared scenes.
    • Fly Me to the Moon marks Greg Berlanti’s direction of Johansson and Tatum.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

82%

  • Unique Points
    • Scarlett Johansson and Channing Tatum worked together in the movie 'Fly Me to the Moon', but no other article mentions this fact.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (30%)
    The article contains editorializing and selective reporting. The author makes statements that go beyond the facts presented in the article, such as 'For decades, questions have dogged the Apollo 11 project. Who really won the space race? (Neil Armstrong may have been first to step foot on the moon, but the Soviets actually beat America into space.)' and 'Did NASA fake the moon landing? (Skeptics still insist it was staged, either by Stanley Kubrick or someone else, for publicity purposes.)'. These statements are not supported by any evidence in the article and are intended to manipulate the reader's emotions. The author also selectively reports details that support their position, such as 'Gilroy’s fresh-take script illustrates how the U.S. government leveraged the strategies of the “Mad Men” era (minus most of the misogyny) to market the lunar mission to the masses.' without mentioning any counterarguments or opposing viewpoints.
    • For decades, questions have dogged the Apollo 11 project. Who really won the space race? (Neil Armstrong may have been first to step foot on the moon, but the Soviets actually beat America into space.)
    • Did NASA fake the moon landing? (Skeptics still insist it was staged, either by Stanley Kubrick or someone else, for publicity purposes.)
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The author makes an appeal to authority by referencing the doubts surrounding the Apollo 11 project and suggesting that Gilroy's script presents an 'alternative version' of events. Additionally, there are instances of inflammatory rhetoric such as 'Skeptics still insist it was staged, either by Stanley Kubrick or someone else, for publicity purposes.'
    • For decades, questions have dogged the Apollo 11 project. Who really won the space race? (Neil Armstrong may have been first to step foot on the moon, but the Soviets actually beat America into space.) Did NASA fake the moon landing? (Skeptics still insist it was staged, either by Stanley Kubrick or someone else, for publicity purposes.)
  • Bias (95%)
    The author expresses a clear ideological bias towards the importance of spin and marketing in historical events, specifically the Apollo 11 moon landing. He repeatedly emphasizes the role of Madison Avenue spin doctors and government agents in shaping public perception of the event.
    • From the moment she appears on screen – wearing a fake pregnancy bump to an ad-agency pitch meeting – Johansson shows where Kelly’s morals lie. She’s playing a corporate con woman to Tatum’s overgrown boy scout.
      • It's unusual even by contemporary standards, when rom-coms have been all but relegated to streaming – where this Apple original was destined until test screenings showed it could support a theatrical run. With its retro-styled polyester costumes and relatively chaste love story, Berlanti’s film reaches back to an earlier, more innocent time, even as it presents a country in turmoil: The Vietnam War was dividing Americans at home, and President Nixon desperately wanted to make good on Kennedy’s promise to put a man on the moon by the end of the decade.
        • Moe essentially blackmails her into playing along, which amounts to an even greater betrayal of Cole’s trust than she’s already done by casting actors to play him and lead engineer Henry Smalls (Ray Romano) for the cameras.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        70%

        • Unique Points
          • Scarlett Johansson plays the role of Kelly Jones, a con artist who fakes pregnancy and deceives people for profit.
          • Woody Harrelson portrays Moe Berkus, a shadowy figure who hires Johansson to sell the moon landing to the public.
          • Channing Tatum stars as Cole Davis, a launch director who values honesty and integrity over profits.
          • The film’s title ‘Fly Me to the Moon’ is based on a conspiracy theory about NASA filming the moon landing on a soundstage.
          • Director Greg Berlanti intends to present the moon landing with integrity but faces challenges due to Johansson’s character prioritizing profits and deceit.
          • Cole and Kelly develop a romance as they work towards getting astronauts to the lunar surface, but their chemistry is lacking.
        • Accuracy
          No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
        • Deception (30%)
          The article contains selective reporting and emotional manipulation. The author expresses a negative opinion about the film 'Fly Me to the Moon' throughout the article, implying that it is a laborious and disappointing film. However, he only reports details that support this opinion and ignores any positive aspects of the film. For example, he mentions that 'the action lacks requisite snap, crackle, and pop' but does not mention any scenes or moments where the film may have succeeded in generating humor or excitement. He also expresses his disappointment with certain character decisions and plot points without considering why they might have been made or how they contribute to the story. Additionally, the author uses emotional language to describe his reactions to the film, such as 'dismal degree of seriousness' and 'laborious affair that rarely gets off the ground'. This manipulates readers' emotions by making them feel as if they should share the author's negative opinion of the film without providing any objective analysis or evidence.
          • Yet rather than using its cheeky conceit for zippy humor and enticing amour, it spends excessive time on trauma, guilt, regret, and other heavy topics that are as ill-fitting as they are superficially handled.
          • From a plot standpoint, this is preposterous; the idea that NASA wouldn’t have documented this groundbreaking voyage strains even these proceedings’ credibility.
          • Worse, however, is that it’s not consistent with the material’s single theme, since Cole—a stickler for integrity—should want to faithfully present this achievement to the world.
          • A romantic comedy with delusions of dramatic grandeur, Fly Me to the Moon (July 12, in theaters) has a frothy premise that it treats with a dismal degree of seriousness.
        • Fallacies (75%)
          The article contains several instances of appeals to authority and inflammatory rhetoric. The author makes repeated references to the film's 'delusions of dramatic grandeur' and its 'laborious affair that rarely gets off the ground.' These statements are not based on any specific evidence or arguments presented in the article, but rather on the author's personal opinion of the film. Additionally, there are several instances where the author makes assumptions about characters and their motivations without providing any evidence to support those assumptions. For example, when describing Cole as a 'stickler for integrity,' the author does not provide any evidence that this is actually true or that it is relevant to the story. These fallacies bring down the score from a potential 100.
          • ]A romantic comedy with delusions of dramatic grandeur[
          • Fly Me to the Moon drags its feet at almost every turn, though its steps are painfully predictable.
          • Rather than gearing things toward light and frivolous zaniness, Gilroy steers his saga into earnestness.
        • Bias (50%)
          The author expresses a clear dislike for the film's handling of serious topics and its lack of humor. This could be seen as a neutral observation, but the author also uses language that implies that the film is laborious and lacking in snap, crackle, and pop. Additionally, there are several instances where the author criticizes specific aspects of the film for being ill-fitting or inconsistent with its themes. These criticisms could be seen as reflecting a bias against films that take a serious approach to romantic comedies or space exploration.
          • A romantic comedy with delusions of dramatic grandeur, Fly Me to the Moon (July 12, in theaters) has a frothy premise that it treats with a dismal degree of seriousness.
            • From a plot standpoint, this is preposterous; the idea that NASA wouldn’t have documented this groundbreaking voyage strains even these proceedings’ credibility.
              • The veracity of the moon landing (and its public presentation) winds up being central to Fly Me to the Moon, which eventually pivots around Moe ordering Kelly to orchestrate a fake version of the landing as a backup plan in case the actual mission goes awry.
                • Worse, however, is that it’s not consistent with the material’s single theme, since Cole—a stickler for integrity—should want to faithfully present this achievement to the world.
                  • Yet rather than using its cheeky conceit for zippy humor and enticing amour, it spends excessive time on trauma, guilt, regret, and other heavy topics that are as ill-fitting as they are superficially handled.
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication