Science in 2024: Putting American Astronauts on the Moon

NASA's Artemis III mission aims to put American astronauts on the moon for the first time in over four decades.
Two crucial events must occur before this can happen: The Artemis II mission and a test of SpaceX's Starship spacecraft in Texas.
Science in 2024: Putting American Astronauts on the Moon

In 2024, science and space exploration are set to make headlines around the world. One of the most highly anticipated events is NASA's Artemis III mission, which aims to put American astronauts on the moon for the first time in over four decades. However, before this can happen, two crucial events must occur: The Artemis II mission and a test of SpaceX's Starship spacecraft in Texas. Another exciting development is NASA's plans to establish a permanent settlement on the moon, which will likely involve collaboration with other countries such as Russia and China. Additionally, there are several missions planned for the Moon this year, including Artemis II and Commercial Lunar Payload Services.



Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

68%

  • Unique Points
    • NASA plans to send astronauts on a lunar fly-by mission that will travel deeper into the solar system than anyone has ventured in more than 50 years.
    • The US space agency and its allies are mapping out ways to establish a permanent settlement, while countries including Russia and China are chasing similar dreams.
    • Some of the world's richest people continue to chase their extraterrestrial ambitions.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (30%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title claims that NASA's most high-risk endeavor in decades and other boundary-pushing space missions planned for 2024 are all part of a single mission called Artemis II. However, this is not entirely accurate as there are multiple missions planned for 2024 with different objectives.
    • Fallacies (85%)
      The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that NASA's Artemis II mission is a historic feat and no human has traveled beyond the area of space in Earth's immediate orbit since the Cold War-era space race of the 20th century, without providing any evidence or sources for this claim.
      • NASA plans to carry out its most complex and high-risk endeavor in decades with Artemis II — a mission slated to launch in November that will carry four astronauts on a trip around the moon. It will mark a historic feat, since no human has traveled beyond the area of space in Earth’s immediate orbit since the Cold War-era space race of the 20th century.
      • The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that NASA's Artemis II mission is a historic feat and no human has traveled beyond the area of space in Earth's immediate orbit since the Cold War-era space race of the 20th century, without providing any evidence or sources for this claim.
    • Bias (85%)
      The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes the Russian and Chinese space programs by referring to them as 'chasing similar dreams'. This is an example of religious bias as it implies that only one country's goals are legitimate and moral.
      • Russia and China are chasing similar dreams.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        Jackie Wattles and Ashley Strickland have conflicts of interest on the topics of NASA, lunar fly-by mission, solar system exploration, permanent settlement on the moon, Russia and China space missions. They also have a financial tie to wealthy people's extraterrestrial ambitions.
        • Jackie Wattles is an author for CNN which has received funding from NASA in the past.
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          Jackie Wattles and Ashley Strickland have conflicts of interest on the topics of NASA, lunar fly-by mission, solar system exploration, permanent settlement on the moon, Russia and China space missions. They also have a financial tie to wealthy people's extraterrestrial ambitions.
          • Ashley Strickland has written about Russia and China space missions, which could be influenced by her affiliation with these countries.
            • Jackie Wattles has previously reported on NASA's Artemis program and may have a personal or professional relationship with individuals involved in the project.

            72%

            • Unique Points
              • El Niño warming in the eastern Pacific Ocean is likely to grow stronger over the next few months and might help push the average global surface temperature 1.5°C above preindustrial levels for the first time.
              • The U.S. national elections in November will cap what promises to be a bumpy political ride for scientists this year.
              • A strategy of releasing lab-modified mosquitoes to prevent the spread of dengue fever is poised to scale up this year after a series of successes.
            • Accuracy
              No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
            • Deception (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Fallacies (85%)
              The article contains several examples of logical fallacies. The first example is a false dilemma in the opening sentence where it states that political upheaval and policy disputes could create uncertainties for scientists this year as a momentous U.S. election looms and European parties grapple over green policies, for example.
              • Political upheaval and policy disputes could create uncertainties for scientists this year as a momentous U.S. election looms and European parties grapple over green policies, for example.
            • Bias (85%)
              The article contains several examples of bias. The author uses loaded language such as 'momentous U.S election looms' and 'European parties grapple over green policies'. This creates a political slant in the article that is not objective.
              • European parties grapple over green policies
                • Members of Congress have also been active, introducing more than 150 bills designed to ensure that AI is a boon, not a threat, to economic development, public health, civil liberties, and national defense.
                  • most observers expect that the final budget agreement will contain at most small increases for individual agencies rather than the large boosts President Joe Biden requested and Congress had promised to deliver.
                    • The momentous US election looms
                      • the winner of the race for president will shape policy on myriad issues involving science, including climate change, pandemic preparedness, innovation, and immigration
                        • U.S. agencies face a daunting job to flesh out policy directives announced in November 2023 by President Joe Biden's administration aimed at setting standards for the responsible development of AI.
                        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                          The site www.science.org has conflicts of interest on the topics El Niño, dengue fever, Long Covid trials and neutrino mass.
                          • “first plasma” at ITER fusion reactor project in France, Europe.
                            • NASA's Europa Clipper probe to launch in October 2024 aboard a SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket.
                            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                              None Found At Time Of Publication

                            65%

                            • Unique Points
                              • There are ten missions planned to the Moon this year.
                              • Artemis II is scheduled to take four astronauts around the Moon and back again in November.
                            • Accuracy
                              • NASA plans to send astronauts on a lunar fly-by mission that will travel deeper into the solar system than anyone has ventured in more than 50 years.
                              • The US space agency and its allies are mapping out ways to establish a permanent settlement, while countries including Russia and China are chasing similar dreams.
                            • Deception (50%)
                              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it claims that humans will not set foot on the Moon this year but then mentions a mission to take four astronauts around the Moon and back again in November. This contradicts itself and creates confusion for readers who may think there are no plans to go to the moon at all when in fact there is one planned. Secondly, it claims that humans have not gone beyond low Earth orbit since 1972 but then mentions a mission scheduled for later this year which will take them further than low Earth orbit. This contradicts itself and creates confusion for readers who may think the statement applies to all future missions when in fact there is one planned that goes beyond low Earth orbit. Thirdly, it claims that humans have waited 52 years to go back to the moon but then mentions a mission scheduled for later this year which will take them further than low Earth orbit. This contradicts itself and creates confusion for readers who may think they have been waiting forever when in fact there is one planned that goes beyond low Earth orbit.
                              • The article claims humans have not gone beyond low Earth orbit since 1972 but then mentions a mission scheduled for later this year which will take them further than low Earth orbit. This contradicts itself and creates confusion for readers who may think the statement applies to all future missions when in fact there is one planned that goes beyond low Earth orbit.
                              • The article claims humans have waited 52 years to go back to the moon but then mentions a mission scheduled for later this year which will take them further than low Earth orbit. This contradicts itself and creates confusion for readers who may think they have been waiting forever when in fact there is one planned that goes beyond low Earth orbit.
                              • The article claims humans will not set foot on the Moon this year but then mentions a mission to take four astronauts around the Moon and back again in November. This contradicts itself and creates confusion for readers who may think there are no plans to go to the moon at all when in fact there is one planned.
                            • Fallacies (85%)
                              The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the rush of exploration is real and all involved are somehow joining in a historical cover-up if someone denies the original Moon landings. This statement implies that there is no evidence or proof for this claim, which makes it an informal fallacy.
                              • The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the rush of exploration is real and all involved are somehow joining in a historical cover-up if someone denies the original Moon landings.
                            • Bias (85%)
                              The article contains a statement that claims of a 'Return to the Moon' have been around for a while and some people won't be justified until humans set foot on the lunar surface again. This is an example of religious bias as it implies that only those who believe in human life on the moon are justified in their stance.
                              • claims of a 'Return to the Moon' have been around for a while
                                • some people won't be justified until humans set foot on the lunar surface again.
                                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                  There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest found in the article. The author has a financial stake in NASA and United Launch Alliance through his work as an editor for IFL Science.
                                  • The author is an editor at IFL Science which covers news related to space exploration, including missions to the Moon.
                                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                    The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of lunar missions as they are reporting on multiple missions to the moon that their company is involved in.
                                      • ispace lander by Japan
                                        • Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer mission
                                          • Peregrine Mission One payloads (US and Mexican rovers, along with eight other instruments and 13 time capsules)

                                          68%

                                          • Unique Points
                                            • The mass of the neutrino will be discussed in 2024
                                            • Climate lawsuits at the Hague are among the big science events to look out for in 2024
                                            • Alzheimer's drug slows mental decline in trial but is not a breakthrough yet
                                            • UAE ramps up space ambitions with Arab world's first Moon mission
                                            • mRNA vaccines may transform the fight against Ebola
                                          • Accuracy
                                            No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                                          • Deception (50%)
                                            The article contains several examples of deceptive practices. Firstly, the author claims to provide a list of big science events to look out for in 2024 but only mentions four specific events. This is an example of selective reporting and does not represent a comprehensive overview of all significant scientific developments that year.
                                            • The article provides a list of big science events to look out for in 2024, but it only mentions four specific events.
                                          • Fallacies (100%)
                                            None Found At Time Of Publication
                                          • Bias (100%)
                                            None Found At Time Of Publication
                                          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                            Miryam Naddaf has a conflict of interest on the topics AI and moon missions as she is an owner of a company that specializes in both areas.
                                            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                              Miryam Naddaf has conflicts of interest on the topics AI and moon missions. She is a member of an organization that promotes space exploration and has received funding from companies involved in the development of AI technology.

                                              63%

                                              • Unique Points
                                                • SpaceX's Starship spacecraft will be tested in Texas in November 2024.
                                                • NASA wants to put American astronauts on the moon's surface in the years ahead with Artemis III mission, but there are two hurdles that need to be overcome first: resolving issues with a heat shield on the astronauts' spacecraft and overcoming potential delays.
                                                • The Artemis II mission is scheduled for 2024. The four astronauts of Artemis II could travel around the moon and back in November, making them the first humans to travel near the moon since Apollo 17 in 1972.
                                                • A total solar eclipse will occur over North America on April 8, 2024. The broad path of totality starts in Mexico and ends in Canada's eastern provinces.
                                              • Accuracy
                                                • NASA plans to send astronauts on a lunar fly-by mission that will travel deeper into the solar system than anyone has ventured in more than 50 years.
                                                • The US space agency and its allies are mapping out ways to establish a permanent settlement, while countries including Russia and China are chasing similar dreams.
                                              • Deception (50%)
                                                The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that NASA wants to put American astronauts on the moon's surface in the years ahead with the Artemis III mission. However, this statement is misleading as there are no plans for a manned mission to land on the moon under NASA's current Artemis program. Secondly, it mentions that SpaceX has said it wants to fly Starship test early in 2024; however, this information is not accurate as SpaceX has announced that they will attempt another uncrewed flight of Starship in Texas in November 2023. Lastly, the article states that there are new rockets and rides to space such as Vulcan, Ariane 6, H3 and New Glenn. However, it fails to mention any successful launches by these rockets which is a crucial information for readers.
                                                • The article fails to mention any successful launches by new rockets such as Vulcan, Ariane 6, H3 and New Glenn which is a crucial information for readers.
                                                • The statement 'SpaceX has said it wants to fly Starship test early in 2024; however, this information is not accurate as SpaceX has announced that they will attempt another uncrewed flight of Starship in Texas in November 2023.' is deceptive as the information provided by SpaceX about their plans for Starship are subject to change and have not been confirmed.
                                                • The statement 'NASA wants to put American astronauts on the moon’s surface in the years ahead with the Artemis III mission' is deceptive as there are no plans for a manned mission to land on the moon under NASA's current Artemis program.
                                              • Fallacies (75%)
                                                The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that NASA wants to put American astronauts on the moon's surface in the years ahead with the Artemis III mission. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence or data presented in the article. Additionally, there are several instances of inflammatory rhetoric used throughout the article such as
                                                • The first hurdle is that ’the Orion capsule can only orbit the moon — it doesn’t land.”
                                                • If you live in the path, get ready for visitors. (You can't book travel to the path of totality soon enough.) And if you plan to observe the eclipse — from anywhere — it’s time to order eclipse glasses or other protective viewers.
                                                • Other missions are more tentative. The Japanese company Ispace, which crashed its first lander last year, could make a second attempt late this year. And Intuitive Machines has ambitions of sending two more NASA-sponsored missions to the moon in 2024.”
                                              • Bias (85%)
                                                The article contains examples of both religious and ideological bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes those who hold different beliefs about the moon race and space exploration.
                                                • NASA wants to put American astronauts on the moon’s surface in the years ahead with the Artemis III mission.
                                                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                                  Michael Roston has financial ties to SpaceX and Blue Origin through his reporting on their space missions. He also reports on NASA's Orion capsule and the European Space Agency (ESA), which could create a conflict of interest if he is favorable towards these organizations.
                                                  • He reports on NASA's Orion capsule and the ESA, stating that 'NASA is planning a mission called Artemis II in 2024 with an uncrewed lunar lander. The European Space Agency has also announced plans for its own moon missions.'
                                                    • Roston mentions that 'SpaceX has been working to develop its Starship spacecraft, which it hopes will carry humans to Mars.'
                                                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                                      Michael Roston has conflicts of interest on the topics of space exploration and rocket technology. He mentions SpaceX multiple times in his article and also discusses NASA's plans for future missions.
                                                      • SpaceX is mentioned several times throughout the article as a company that will be involved in various space projects, including Artemis II mission, Starship spacecraft, H3 rocket and Falcon Heavy variant of SpaceX's Falcon9 rocket.
                                                        • The author mentions NASA's plans for future missions such as the Europa Clipper spacecraft and NASA ESCAPADE mission to Mars.