Maxwell Anderson was charged with first-degree intentional homicide and mutilating a corpse after the remains of Sade Robinson were found.
On April 12, a Milwaukee woman named Sade Robinson was reported missing. Her body parts were later found in different locations over the next few days.
The severed leg believed to belong to her was discovered on April 2.
On April 12, a Milwaukee woman named Sade Robinson was reported missing. Her body parts were later found in different locations over the next few days, including by railroad tracks but identification is still pending. On April 13, Maxwell Anderson was charged with first-degree intentional homicide and mutilating a corpse after the remains of Sade Robinson were found. The severed leg believed to belong to her was discovered on April 2.
Maxwell Anderson appeared in a Milwaukee County courtroom on Friday to face charges of first-degree intentional homicide, mutilating a corpse and arson.
The allegations in the complaint are abhorrent. It is the highest level of violence imaginable.
Accuracy
Maxwell Anderson is accused of killing Sade Robinson and mutilating her corpse.
Robinson was last seen at Twisted Fisherman for what appeared to be a first date with Anderson the night before she went missing.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'abhorrent' and 'highest level of violence imaginable' to create a sense of urgency and horror for the reader without providing any context or evidence to support these claims. Secondly, the author quotes Assistant District Attorney Ian Vance-Curzan stating that Anderson killed Sade Robinson and dismembered her body, but does not provide any evidence or sources to back up this claim. This is a lie by omission as it implies that there is no doubt about the facts when in reality there may be other explanations for the severed leg found at Warnimont Park. Thirdly, the author quotes defense attorney Anthony Cotton stating that Anderson did not have enough evidence to support the first-degree intentional homicide charge, but does not provide any context or sources to back up this claim either. This is another lie by omission as it implies that there is no doubt about the facts when in reality there may be other explanations for why Anderson was charged with such a serious crime.
Maxwell Anderson is accused of killing Sade Robinson and mutilating her corpse.
A preliminary DNA analysis found that Sade's severed leg was found at Warnimont Park in Cudahy on April 2, one day after she went missing.
Damage to gate at Warnimont Park was reported by employees of the Cudahy Water Department before dawn on April 2.
A video from Cudahy High School showed a vehicle driving past the parkway around 3:02 a.m., consistent with Anderson's car, which had been found burned near Robinson's home later that day.
Robinson was last seen at Twisted Fisherman, a restaurant on Canal Street, for what appeared to be a first date with Anderson the night before she went missing.
Anderson is accused of arson and mutilating Robinson's corpse in addition to murder.
Accuracy
Robinson was last seen at Twisted Fisherman for what appeared to be a first date with Anderson the night before she went missing.
Deception
(90%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the headline claims that Maxwell Anderson has been formally charged with first-degree intentional homicide and mutilating a corpse. However, the body of Sade Robinson was only found partially dismembered and there are no details about what happened to her other remains. Secondly, the article states that Anderson tried to get the charge dismissed by arguing there wasn't enough evidence but this is not mentioned in any court records or legal documents provided in the article. Thirdly, the article claims that Robinson was last seen on April 2nd and found dead two days later but it does not mention if she went missing before being killed.
The headline states that Maxwell Anderson has been formally charged with first-degree intentional homicide and mutilating a corpse. However, the body of Sade Robinson was only found partially dismembered and there are no details about what happened to her other remains.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the crime and the victim's family members. Additionally, there are instances where the author quotes people without providing context or clarification on their relationship to Sade Robinson.
Inflammatory Rhetoric:
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement that Maxwell Anderson is accused of killing Sade Robinson and mutilating her corpse. This implies bias towards the prosecution's case against Anderson.
]Sade Robinson killed, search continues for remains[
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest found in the article. The author has a personal relationship with Maxwell Anderson and may be hesitant to report on him negatively.
`Robinson’s severed leg `
The defendant did tremendous amount of work to try to cover up the crime
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topics of Maxwell Anderson and DNA analysis. The article mentions an association between one number texted to Maxwell S. Anderson and Twisted Fisherman, which is owned by Milwaukee County Sheriff's Office.
an association between (one of the numbers being texted) and Maxwell S. Anderson
The defendant did tremendous amount of work to try to cover up the crime
Maxwell Anderson was charged with first-degree intentional homicide and mutilating a corpse after the remains of Sade Robinson were found. The severed leg believed to belong to her was discovered on April 2.
Robinson's body parts were found in different locations over the next few days, including by railroad tracks but identification is still pending.
Accuracy
Maxwell Anderson was charged with homicide and mutilating a corpse after the remains of Sade Robinson were found. The severed leg believed to belong to her was discovered on April 2.
Robinson's body parts were found in different locations over the next few days.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author does not disclose their sources or provide any evidence to support their claims. Secondly, the article uses sensationalist language such as 'horrendous tragedy' and 'heinous crime', which are designed to manipulate emotions rather than present facts objectively. Thirdly, the article quotes a statement from an attorney representing Anderson without providing any context or clarification on what this means for the investigation. Lastly, the article uses selective reporting by only mentioning one of three locations where human remains were found.
The severed leg was found April 2 and has preliminarily identified as belonging to Robinson.
Fallacies
(85%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a religious bias. The author uses the phrase 'horrendous tragedy' to describe the death of Sade Robinson which implies that her death is something negative and tragic.
]This is justice for Sade[
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The article reports on the discovery of human remains in Milwaukee and the subsequent arrest of Maxwell Anderson for his alleged involvement in Sade Robinson's disappearance. The author has a personal relationship with one source mentioned in the article (Sade Scarbrough) which could compromise their ability to report objectively.
An attorney listed as representing Anderson did not immediately respond to a request for comment late Friday.
The district attorney’s office charged Anderson with first-degree intentional homicide, mutilating a corpse and arson of property other than building
Maxwell Anderson appeared in a Milwaukee County courtroom on Friday to face charges of first-degree intentional homicide, mutilating a corpse and arson.
Robinson's family was audibly upset during Anderson's appearance.
Accuracy
Maxwell Anderson was charged with first-degree intentional homicide and arson in the death of Sade Robinson.
Robinson had been reported missing on April 2 by a friend. An employee of the building where she lived told police that she was excited about a date she had planned for April 1.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive because it omits important details that would help the reader understand the full extent of Anderson's crimes. For example, it does not mention that he allegedly set Robinson's car on fire after killing her and mutilating her body, or that he had a history of domestic violence against his ex-girlfriend. It also does not disclose any sources for its information, making it seem like a one-sided account of the events. Additionally, the article uses emotional language such as 'excited' and 'date' to describe Robinson's last moments, which may manipulate the reader into feeling sympathy for her rather than anger or outrage at Anderson.
The article uses emotional language such as 'excited' and 'date' to describe Robinson's last moments, which may manipulate the reader into feeling sympathy for her rather than anger or outrage at Anderson. This is deceptive because it does not present a balanced view of the situation and may influence the reader's opinion of Anderson without giving them all the facts.
The article does not mention that Anderson had a history of domestic violence against his ex-girlfriend. This is relevant because it suggests that he has a pattern of violent behavior and may have targeted Robinson for reasons other than their relationship.
The article says that the human remains found at the park were 'additional' to Robinson's leg, but does not specify what they were or how they were related to her death. This is deceptive because it leaves out important information that would help the reader understand why Anderson was charged with mutilating a corpse and arson.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the Associated Press left a voicemail seeking comment from Maxwell's attorney without providing any evidence or context for this claim.
Robinson had been reported missing on April 2 by a friend.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a few examples of bias. Firstly, the use of language such as 'slaying' and 'mutilating corpse' is highly sensationalistic and could be seen as inflammatory. Secondly, there are several instances where the author quotes people without providing any context or information about their backgrounds or motivations. This makes it difficult to determine whether these statements should be taken at face value or not. Finally, the article mentions that additional human remains were found on April 5 and April 6 but does not provide any further details about what was discovered. This could suggest a lack of transparency in the investigation.
Lack of transparency in the investigation
Quoting people without providing context or information about their backgrounds or motivations
The use of language such as 'slaying' and 'mutilating corpse'
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The Associated Press has a conflict of interest on the topic of 'slaying' as they are reporting on a murder. The article also mentions Milwaukee County Sheriff Denita Ball who may have an affiliation with law enforcement and therefore could be biased towards the accused.
The Associated Press is reporting on a murder, which creates a conflict of interest as they are not impartial in their coverage.
