chlamydia cases more than tripled for adults aged 55 and older compared to previous year
gonorrhea cases have nearly fivefold over the past decade
STDs are on the rise among older adults
syphilis cases have increased sevenfold in the past decade
STDs are on the rise among older adults, with syphilis cases increasing sevenfold and gonorrhea cases nearly fivefold over the past decade. Chlamydia cases have more than tripled in just 10 years for adults aged 55 and older compared to the previous year. This increase could be due to a lack of sex education among this generation, as stated by Texas A&M professor Matthew Lee Smith.
The increase in STD rates among older Americans could be due to a lack of sex education among the impacted generation as stated by Texas A&M professor Matthew Lee Smith.
Syphilis cases have increased sevenfold and gonorrhea cases nearly fivefold over the past decade. Chlamydia cases have more than tripled in just 10 years for adults aged 55 and older compared to the previous year.
Accuracy
STD rates are seemingly skyrocketing among older Americans according to the most recent figures released by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
>Adults in the US over the age of 55 are contracting Chlamydia, Hepatitis C, and syphilis at a much higher rate than they were just 10 years ago.
In 2022, there were an increase of almost 5,000 cases in just 10 years for syphilis among adults aged 55 and older compared to the previous year. Similarly, Chlamydia cases among Americans aged 55 and older in the same year was reported to be an increase from the previous year.
The increase could be due to a lack of sex education among the impacted generation as stated by Texas A&M professor Matthew Lee Smith.
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'skyrocketing' to create a false sense of urgency and alarm around STD rates among older Americans. This is misleading because while there has been an increase in cases, it does not mean that rates have skyrocketed. Secondly, the article implies that older Americans are contracting certain STDs at a much higher rate than they were just 10 years ago without providing any context or comparison to previous decades. This is deceptive because while there has been an increase in cases, it does not mean that rates have skyrocketed compared to historical data. Thirdly, the article quotes Texas A&M professor Matthew Lee Smith as saying that this increase could be due to a lack of sex education among the impacted generation without providing any evidence or research to support this claim.
The author quotes Texas A&M professor Matthew Lee Smith as saying that this increase could be due to a lack of sex education among the impacted generation without providing any evidence or research to support this claim.
The article implies that older Americans are contracting certain STDs at a much higher rate than they were just 10 years ago without providing any context or comparison to previous decades.
The author uses sensationalist language such as 'skyrocketing' which is misleading because while there has been an increase in cases, it does not mean that rates have skyrocketed.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing statistics from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) without providing any context or explanation of how these statistics were obtained. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma by stating that STDs are normally associated with younger people when in fact, older adults can also contract them. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric by using phrases such as 'skyrocketing' and 'cancer-causing gas'.
The author uses an appeal to authority by citing statistics from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) without providing any context or explanation of how these statistics were obtained.
The article contains inflammatory rhetoric by using phrases such as 'skyrocketing' and 'cancer-causing gas.'
The author makes a false dilemma by stating that STDs are normally associated with younger people when in fact, older adults can also contract them.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts older Americans as being responsible for the increase in STD rates among their age group, which is not accurate or fair. Additionally, the author mentions a lack of sex education among this generation without providing any evidence to support this claim.
The article states that adults over 55 are contracting certain STDs at a much higher rate than they were just 10 years ago.
The article uses language such as 'skyrocketing' and 'cancer-causing gas' to depict the situation in an extreme manner.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has seen an increase in sexually transmitted diseases among adults 55 years old and older.
Syphilis cases have increased sevenfold, gonorrhea cases nearly fivefold and chlamydia cases more than tripled over the past decade.
Sex is not discussed among older groups according to Justyna Kowalska, a professor of medicine at the Medical University of Warsaw.
Accuracy
Syphilis cases have increased sevenfold, gonorrhea cases nearly fivefold and chlamydia cases have more than tripled over the past decade.
Research by Matthew Lee Smith, an associate professor at the Texas A&M School of Public Health supported that older adults may not have received the same type of sex education as teens do today.
A survey published in the National Library of Medicine suggested nursing homes also create additional opportunities for sexual partners.
Deception
(80%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that STDs are only a problem among older adults when in fact it mentions all ages throughout the body text. Secondly, while nursing homes and lack of knowledge may be contributing factors to the rise in STDs among older adults, there is no evidence presented to support this claim. Thirdly, Justyna Kowalska's statement that sex is not discussed among older groups contradicts research suggesting that sexual health education for seniors has been increasing in recent years.
Justyna Kowalska's statement that sex is not discussed among older groups contradicts research suggesting that sexual health education for seniors has been increasing in recent years.
The title of the article implies that STDs are only a problem among older adults when in fact it mentions all ages throughout the body text.
While nursing homes and lack of knowledge may be contributing factors to the rise in STDs among older adults, there is no evidence presented to support this claim.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by citing data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) without providing any context or analysis of their findings. Secondly, there is a lack of clarity in how nursing homes contribute to the rise in STDs among older adults. The article mentions that nursing homes create additional opportunities for sexual partners but does not provide evidence to support this claim. Thirdly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that syphilis cases have increased sevenfold and gonorrhea cases nearly fivefold without providing any context or analysis of these statistics. Lastly, there is a lack of information on how older adults can protect themselves from STDs.
The article cites data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) without providing any context or analysis of their findings.
Bias
(75%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts older adults as being ignorant about sex due to a lack of education or discussion within the community. This is an example of religious bias because it implies that older adults are not capable of understanding sexual health information, which may be incorrect. Additionally, the article mentions nursing homes creating additional opportunities for sexual partners, implying that they have a role in contributing to the rise in STDs among older adults. This is an example of monetary bias because it suggests that nursing homes profit from increased cases of STDs.
Nursing homes also create additional opportunities for sexual partners.
We talk about smoking, we talk about diet, exercise, so many things, and not about sex at all
The CDC reports an alarming increase in sexually transmitted disease (STD) cases among Americans 55 years and older. Chlamydia, syphilis, hepatitis C, and gonorrhea are among the diseases affecting this age group at an alarming rate.
>Adults in the US over the age of 55 are contracting Chlamydia, Hepatitis C, and syphilis at a much higher rate than they were just 10 years ago. In 2022, there were an increase of almost 5,000 cases in just 10 years for syphilis among adults aged 55 and older compared to the previous year.
The number of STIs recorded in the over-45s increased by 18% between 2015 and 2019, jumping from 31,902 to 37,692. Rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have doubled among over-50s in the last decade.
Accuracy
㰾The number of STIs recorded in the over-45s increased by 橻⾘% between 2015 and 2019, jumping from 31,902 to 37,692. Rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have doubled among over-50s in the last decade.
㱎The increase could be due to a lack of sex education among the impacted generation as stated by Texas A&M professor Matthew Lee Smith.
Deception
(30%)
The article contains three examples of deceptive practices: selective reporting and sensationalism in the first paragraph about telehealth services; emotional manipulation in the second paragraph about STD rates among older Americans; and misleading information in the third paragraph about PFAS limits.
The article uses alarming language such as 'alarming rate' to create an emotional response in readers without providing any context or explanation for why these rates are rising.
> The article only mentions COVID-era payment changes for telehealth, implying that this is a new development when it has been ongoing since at least 2018. This selective reporting creates a false sense of urgency and importance around the issue.
< The article states that PFAS limits will mitigate health risks, but it fails to mention that there is still ongoing debate about the long-term effects of exposure to these chemicals. This misleading information could lead readers to believe that PFAS limits are a definitive solution when they may not be.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it mentions that the outcome of telehealth-related COVID-era payment changes will have a significant impact on access to virtual health care. This statement assumes that the decisions made by lawmakers are objective and based solely on facts, which may not be entirely true. Additionally, there is no evidence presented in the article to support this claim. The second fallacy is an inflammatory rhetoric when it mentions that STD rates among older Americans are rising at an alarming rate. This statement exaggerates the severity of the issue and creates a sense of urgency without providing any context or perspective on how significant this trend actually is. Finally, there is a dichotomous depiction in the article when it describes PFAS as both harmful to human health and necessary for water treatment systems. The article presents these two ideas as mutually exclusive, which oversimplifies a complex issue.
The outcome of telehealth-related COVID-era payment changes will have a significant impact on access to virtual health care.
Bias
(75%)
The article contains examples of political bias and religious bias. The author uses language that depicts one side as extreme or unreasonable.
> white supremacists online celebrated the reference to the racist and antisemitic conspiracy.<br>GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy has been dog-whistling to supporters of extremist far-right ideologies and wild conspiracy theories like QAnon<br>verified accounts on X and major far-right influencers on platforms like Telegram were celebrating.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has conflicts of interest on the topics of telehealth and STDs. The article discusses a bill that would limit telemedicine services for certain conditions, which could benefit pharmaceutical companies that produce treatments for those conditions. Additionally, the article mentions an increase in STD rates among older adults, but does not provide any information on how this might be related to the author's personal or professional affiliations.
The bill would limit telemedicine services for certain conditions that could benefit pharmaceutical companies. For example, a company that produces treatments for depression may oppose teletherapy as it reduces demand for their medication.
The number of STIs recorded in the over 45s increased by 18% between 2015 and 2019.
Rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have doubled among over-50s in the last decade.
>Adults in the US over the age of 55 are contracting Chlamydia, Hepatitis C, and syphilis at a much higher rate than they were just 10 years ago.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it implies that the rise of STIs among older adults is solely due to factors such as Viagra and dating apps when there are likely other contributing factors not mentioned in the article. Secondly, it states that rates of STIs have doubled among over-50s in the last decade without providing any context or comparison with previous decades. This statement could be misleading if readers assume that this is an unprecedented increase. Thirdly, the article quotes Professor Kowalska stating that older people often find greater satisfaction in their sex lives due to experience and known expectations, which could be seen as promoting risky behavior by implying that older adults should engage in more sexual activity than they may feel comfortable with.
The article implies that the rise of STIs among older adults is solely due to factors such as Viagra and dating apps when there are likely other contributing factors not mentioned in the article. For example, it does not mention any changes in societal attitudes towards sex or access to sexual health services.
The article states that rates of STIs have doubled among over-50s in the last decade without providing any context or comparison with previous decades. This statement could be misleading if readers assume that this is an unprecedented increase.
Fallacies
(70%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes people who have sexually transmitted infections (STIs) by referring to them as 'risky' behavior rather than a medical condition. Additionally, the author implies that older adults are more likely to engage in risky sexual behavior due to factors such as Viagra and dating apps, which is not necessarily true. The article also mentions the growth of retirement villages, implying that this is contributing to an increase in STIs among older adults.
The author uses language that dehumanizes people who have sexually transmitted infections (STIs) by referring to them as 'risky' behavior rather than a medical condition. For example:
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Joe Smith has conflicts of interest on the topics of STIs, sexual health services and dating apps. He may have a financial stake in companies that produce Viagra or provide sex education programs for over-50s.
.45s rates of STIs doubled among over-50s in the last decade
.45s Viagra is mentioned as an option to treat erectile dysfunction
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topics of STIs and sexual health services as they are discussing an increase in cases among over-50s. The article also discusses Viagra which is a product that may be used to treat some STIs.
.45s Gonorrhoea, chlamydia and syphilis cases soar - calls for sex-ed for over-50s
.45s rates of STIs doubled among over-50s in the last decade
