Stock Market Lull Ahead of Key Inflation Data and Earnings Reports: Alphabet's New Custom Arm-based Chip Drives Growth

New York, United States United States of America
Despite this uncertainty, some stocks continue to perform well.
The stock market is experiencing a lull ahead of the release of key inflation data and earnings reports. The S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite, and Dow Jones Industrial Average are all trading in relatively flat ranges as investors wait for these important pieces of information to be released.
Stock Market Lull Ahead of Key Inflation Data and Earnings Reports: Alphabet's New Custom Arm-based Chip Drives Growth

The stock market is experiencing a lull ahead of the release of key inflation data and earnings reports. The S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite, and Dow Jones Industrial Average are all trading in relatively flat ranges as investors wait for these important pieces of information to be released. Despite this uncertainty, some stocks continue to perform well. For example, Alphabet has recently announced a new custom Arm-based chip at its Cloud Next conference and is currently experiencing strong growth.



Confidence

70%

Doubts
  • It is not clear how accurate the inflation data will be or what impact it will have on the stock market.

Sources

66%

  • Unique Points
    • US stocks edged higher on Tuesday as investors bided their time until a key inflation report lands and potentially sheds light on the path of interest rates. The benchmark S&P 500 (GSPC) climbed about 4%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite (IXIC) jumped roughly 1%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJI) added about 3%.
    • The upcoming quarterly refunding update from the US Treasury will provide information on how much bond supply there will be. Investors are anticipating just two and a half rate cuts this year, down from six expected at the start of the year.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (30%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that 'investors have become increasingly less convinced the Federal Reserve will deliver on the three rate cuts it has projected for this year', but provides no evidence to support this claim. Secondly, the author quotes Mizuho Securities USA chief economist Steven Ricchiuto saying 'The Fed is fighting the economy' and that 'If interest rates remain unchanged, you could get into an environment where you begin to embed a 3% inflation psychology into the marketplace', but this quote does not accurately reflect Ricchiuto's full statement. Thirdly, the article contains several examples of sensationalism such as 'fading rate-cut hopes have helped push up the 10-year Treasury (TNX) yield near five-month highs' and 'the benchmark yield slipped about 3 basis points on Tuesday to trade around 4.4%'.
    • The article contains several examples of sensationalism such as 'fading rate-cut hopes have helped push up the 10-year Treasury (TNX) yield near five-month highs' and 'the benchmark yield slipped about 3 basis points on Tuesday to trade around 4.4%'.
    • The author quotes Mizuho Securities USA chief economist Steven Ricchiuto saying 'The Fed is fighting the economy' and that 'If interest rates remain unchanged, you could get into an environment where you begin to embed a 3% inflation psychology into the marketplace', but this quote does not accurately reflect Ricchiuto's full statement.
    • The article claims that 'investors have become increasingly less convinced the Federal Reserve will deliver on the three rate cuts it has projected for this year', but provides no evidence to support this claim.
  • Fallacies (75%)
    The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when stating that the Federal Reserve is fighting against American consumers and that this fight could have negative effects on the economy if interest rates remain unchanged. Additionally, there are multiple instances where the author presents information in a dichotomous manner by describing inflation as either cooling or not cooling at all.
    • The Fed is fighting the economy
    • Inflation has begun to cool again seen as an invitation to a June policy shift.
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains examples of monetary bias and religious bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes those who hold different beliefs about the economy than themselves.
    • The 10-year Treasury (<sup>&#8472;</sup>) yield is currently hovering near five-month highswith the 5% level seen as the key point of concern. If treasury yields rise, <em><strong>Monetary Bias:</strong></em> that's a real problem in terms of the outlook for the overall economy because clearly that will have significant negative effects on the ability of households to purchase homes.
      • > The Fed is fighting the American consumers and that's a fight I would not want to get involved in.<br> <p><strong>Religious Bias:</strong></p>
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        Alexandra Canal has a conflict of interest on the topic of US stocks as she is reporting for Yahoo Finance which owns shares in several companies listed on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite. Additionally, her article mentions specific stock tickers such as $GSPC, $IXIC, and $DJI.
        • Alexandra Canal reports for Yahoo Finance which owns shares in several companies listed on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite.
          • The article mentions specific stock tickers such as $GSPC, $IXIC, and $DJI.
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication

          62%

          • Unique Points
            • The Dow Jones Industrial Average pulled back Tuesday as investors struggled to regain some positive momentum ahead of the release of key U.S. inflation data.
            • Shares of Alphabet rose 1.6%, marking a new high for the year, after unveiling a new custom Arm-based chip at its Cloud Next conference.
          • Accuracy
            No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
          • Deception (30%)
            The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title mentions that the Dow Jones Industrial Average pulled back on Tuesday but fails to mention that it was actually up by 1%. Secondly, the author states that investors struggled to regain positive momentum ahead of key U.S inflation data when in fact they were already trading higher before this news came out. Thirdly, the article quotes an economist who expects inflation to have increased by 0.3% but fails to mention that this is a consensus estimate and not necessarily accurate.
            • The article quotes an economist who expects inflation to have increased by 0.3% but fails to mention it's a consensus estimate and not necessarily accurate.
            • The author states investors struggled to regain positive momentum ahead of key U.S inflation data when in fact they were already trading higher before this news came out.
            • The title mentions that the Dow Jones Industrial Average pulled back on Tuesday but failed to mention it was actually up by 1%.
          • Fallacies (70%)
            The article contains several informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing economists surveyed by Dow Jones without providing any context or qualification for their opinions. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma when stating that it's a coin toss whether the Federal Reserve will start cutting rates in June, as there are many factors that could influence this decision. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric by describing inflation data as
            • The March consumer price index report is slated for release Wednesday at 8:30 a.m. ET.
          • Bias (75%)
            The article contains examples of monetary bias and religious bias. The author uses language that depicts the Federal Reserve as a potential catalyst for correction if inflation data is stronger than expected.
            • > Investors will keep a close eye on the data as they search for clues on when the Federal Reserve will start cutting rates.<br>Right now, it's a coin toss whether they'll decrease rates in June, according to the CME Group's FedWatch tool.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            64%

            • Unique Points
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Accuracy
              • The stock market is in a lull ahead of inflation and earnings reports.
              • These 5 stocks drive all of S&P 500's earnings.
            • Deception (50%)
              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that inflation and earnings reports are causing a lull in the stock market when there is no evidence to support this claim. Secondly, the author uses sensationalism by stating that these five stocks drive all of S&P 500's earnings which is not true as other companies also contribute to the overall performance of S&P 500. Thirdly, the article contains a disclaimer at the end which states that information contained herein is not and should not be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell securities. However, this statement does not negate any deceptive practices in the rest of the article.
              • The title implies that inflation and earnings reports are causing a lull in the stock market when there is no evidence to support this claim.
            • Fallacies (85%)
              The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the information is obtained from sources believed to be reliable without providing any evidence or citation for this claim. Secondly, there are two instances of inflammatory rhetoric used in the article: 'Notice' and 'Real-time prices'. Thirdly, there is a dichotomous depiction of real-time prices as being sourced from all markets when it is not specified which markets they come from. Lastly, the author uses an informal fallacy by stating that ownership data provided by Refinitiv and estimates data provided by FactSet are subject to change without notice.
              • Notice: Information contained herein is not and should not be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to buy or sell securities. The information has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable; however no guarantee is made or implied with respect to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness.
              • Real-time prices by Nasdaq Last Sale.
            • Bias (75%)
              The article is biased towards the stock market and its performance. The title mentions that the stock market is in a lull ahead of inflation and earnings reports which implies that it will perform poorly. This statement could be seen as negative bias towards the stock market.
              • ]Notice: Information contained herein is not and should not be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to buy or sell securities. The information has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable; however no guarantee is made or implied with respect to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness. Authors may own the stocks they discuss.
              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication

              68%

              • Unique Points
                None Found At Time Of Publication
              • Accuracy
                • The world's biggest bond market rebounded
                • US stocks edged higher on Tuesday as investors bided their time until a key inflation report lands and potentially sheds light on the path of interest rates. The benchmark S&P 500 (GSPC) climbed about 4%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite (IXIC) jumped roughly 1%.
                • The upcoming quarterly refunding update from the US Treasury will provide information on how much bond supply there will be. Investors are anticipating just two and a half rate cuts this year, down from six expected at the start of the year.
              • Deception (50%)
                The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title mentions 'Stock Market Today' and 'Dow S&P Live Updates for April 9', which implies that this is a live update on the stock market today. However, upon reading further it becomes clear that this article was published on April 8th and does not provide any real-time updates or analysis of the current state of the stock market. This misrepresentation could lead readers to believe they are receiving up-to-date information when in fact they are not.
                • The title mentions 'Stock Market Today' which implies that this is a live update on the stock market today, but upon reading further it becomes clear that this article was published on April 8th and does not provide any real-time updates or analysis of the current state of the stock market.
                • The author states 'Markets have been tempering bets on Fed cuts for days as US economic data remains resilient' which implies that there is a consensus among experts about the likelihood of Fed cuts, but this statement is not supported by any evidence provided in the article.
              • Fallacies (100%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication
              • Bias (75%)
                The article contains a statement that implies the Federal Reserve will make decisions based on inflation data. This is an example of monetary bias as it suggests that the Fed's actions are influenced by economic indicators rather than other factors such as political or social events.
                • > The world’s biggest bond market rebounded, with traders positioning for key inflation data that will help shape the outlook for the Federal Reserve’s next steps. <br> Treasuries climbed, with 10-year yields dropping from the highest levels in 2024 in what's expected to be a fairly quiet session ahead of Wednesday's consumer price index.
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication