Another officer was injured but not killed in the shooting; he is being treated at a hospital with non-life-threatening injuries.
On Sunday, February 19th, two Minnesota police officers and a paramedic were killed while responding to a domestic incident at a home in Burnsville. The suspect had multiple guns and large amounts of ammunition.
On Sunday, February 19th, two Minnesota police officers and a paramedic were killed while responding to a domestic incident at a home in Burnsville. The suspect had multiple guns and large amounts of ammunition. Another officer was injured but not killed in the shooting; he is being treated at a hospital with non-life-threatening injuries. Police Chief Tanya Schwartz said three members of her team made the ultimate sacrifice for this community; they are heroes.
The suspect had multiple guns and large amounts of ammunition
Another officer was injured but not killed in the shooting; he is being treated at a hospital with non-life-threatening injuries
Police Chief Tanya Schwartz said three members of her team made the ultimate sacrifice for this community; they are heroes
Accuracy
At least one of the officers was shot inside the home but BCA is still investigating whether they were killed inside or outside of it.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the suspect died but does not mention anything about how he died or if there was any investigation into his death. This implies that the police did not investigate further and therefore may have overlooked important evidence which could shed light on why this incident occurred. Secondly, the article mentions a SWAT team entering the home after negotiations lasted for hours but does not provide any details about what happened during those negotiations or if there were any attempts to de-escalate the situation before violence was used. This implies that the police may have acted too quickly and without proper consideration of alternative options, which could have resulted in unnecessary loss of life. Finally, the article mentions a firefighter who was killed while providing medical aid to an injured officer but does not provide any details about how he died or if there were any attempts to save him. This implies that the police may have been too focused on killing the suspect and did not prioritize saving lives which is a clear violation of their duty.
The article states that the suspect died without providing any information about his death, implying that no investigation was conducted into his death.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the suspect had multiple guns and large amounts of ammunition without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the shooting as a 'terrible day' without providing any objective analysis or perspective on what makes it terrible. The article also contains an example of dichotomous depiction by stating that negotiations lasted for hours before the suspect opened fire, implying that there were only two options: negotiation or violence. Finally, the author uses a form of informal fallacy when describing the paramedic as part of a SWAT team without providing any context or explanation for this claim.
The suspect had multiple guns and large amounts of ammunition
Negotiations lasted for hours before the suspect opened fire
The suspect had multiple firearms and large amounts of ammunition
At least one of the officers was shot inside the home but BCA is still investigating whether they were killed inside or outside of it.
Negotiations lasted for hours before the suspect opened fire
There is no ongoing threat.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the suspect was dead around 8 a.m., but later reports indicate that he died at approximately 12:30 p.m., which contradicts the initial information provided by law enforcement officials.
The article initially stated that the suspect was dead around 8 a.m, however this is not accurate as reported by BCA Superintendent Drew Evans who said none of the other family members inside the home were harmed and confirmed that all three officers died at approximately 12:30 p.m.
The article states that 'numerous responders returned fire', but it does not specify how many or what type of responders returned fire, which could be misleading to readers.
Fallacies
(80%)
The article contains an example of a dichotomous depiction. The author describes the suspect as 'a man' and then later says that he barricaded himself inside with family members. This creates a contrast between the suspect being described as both dangerous and having innocent victims.
>A domestic abuse call in Burnsville turned into a deadly armed confrontation Sunday when a man shot and killed two Burnsville police officers and one firefighter paramedic.<br>The encounter escalated into an exchange of gunfire, killing three first responders and injuring another.
Burnsville Fire Chief BJ Jungmann added: <br>'This is the toughest day that the city of Burnsville and our public safety families have ever experienced. My heart and prayers go out to the families who lost a loved one in the line of duty today.<br>We are all grieving and we’re all trying to understand what happened and why.'
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Kilat Fitzgerald has conflicts of interest on the topics of domestic abuse and gunfire as they are related to a shooting incident in which two police officers and one EMS responder were killed. The article does not disclose these conflicts.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Kilat Fitzgerald has conflicts of interest on the topics of domestic abuse and gunfire as he is a member of the Burnsville Police Department. He also has personal relationships with Paul Elmstrand, Matthew Ruge, Adam Finseth and BCAS Superintendent Drew Evans who are all involved in this incident.
Kilat Fitzgerald has personal relationships with Paul Elmstrand, Matthew Ruge, Adam Finseth and BCAS Superintendent Drew Evans who are all involved in this incident.
Kilat Fitzgerald is a member of the Burnsville Police Department which was involved in the domestic call that escalated to gunfire.
The suspect had multiple weapons and shot at police from multiple positions within the home.
There is no ongoing threat.
One other police officer, Sgt. Adam Medlicott, was injured by the gunman during their response.
<img src=
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the situation escalated after officers arrived at the home on a domestic call. However, this statement implies that there was no initial danger or threat when police were called to the scene. This contradicts information provided later in the article where authorities state that they received reports of an armed man barricaded with his family members and seven children aged 2-15 years old before officers arrived on the domestic call. Secondly, it is stated that several officers returned fire after a suspect was reported to be dead. This implies that there were multiple rounds fired by police at the suspect during their response, which contradicts information provided later in the article where authorities state that only one officer was injured and no other officers fired their weapons at the time of his injury. Lastly, it is stated that bullet holes can be seen on a vehicle after a police shooting in Burnsville. However, this statement implies that there were multiple rounds fired by police into the vehicle during the shootout which contradicts information provided later in the article where authorities state that only one officer was injured and no other officers fired their weapons at the time of his injury.
The situation escalated after officers arrived on a domestic call
Bullet holes can be seen on a vehicle after a police shooting in Burnsville.
Several officers returned fire after a suspect was reported to be dead
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
FOX 9 has a conflict of interest on the topic of domestic calls involving firefighter-paramedics as they are owned by a company that provides emergency medical services.
Two police officers and a paramedic were shot dead during an hours-long standoff with a man who barricaded himself inside his home with his family.
The still unnamed shooter died at the scene from what reports suggest appeared a self-inflicted gunshot wound, though his cause of death is still unconfirmed. A fourth officer was injured in the shooting but treated for non-life threatening injuries.
Accuracy
The officers were responding to a domestic abuse call about a man who had barricaded himself in his home with his family and there was multiple firearms inside the house.
Negotiations lasted for hours before the suspect opened fire
Another police officer was injured but not killed in the shooting; he is being treated at a hospital with non-life-threatening injuries
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'gunman dead' and 'two cops and a paramedic killed'. This creates an emotional response in readers without providing any context or details about what actually happened. Secondly, the article quotes sources that are not disclosed which makes it difficult to verify their credibility. Thirdly, the author uses selective reporting by only mentioning certain aspects of the incident such as 'domestic abuse calls' and 'gunfire erupted', while leaving out other important details like why police were called in the first place or what led up to the shootout. Lastly, there is no evidence presented that supports any claims made about the suspect taking his own life.
The author quotes sources that are not disclosed which makes it difficult to verify their credibility.
The article uses sensationalist language such as 'gunman dead' and 'two cops and a paramedic killed'.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the officers were responding to a domestic abuse call about a man who had barricaded himself in his home with his family. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence or quotes from officials. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the suspect as 'dangerous' and refusing to come out of their home. This language is intended to elicit an emotional response rather than providing objective information about the situation. The article also contains a dichotomous depiction by stating that officers Matthew Ruge, Paul Elmstrand, and Adam Finseth were all gunned down during the standoff while another officer was injured but treated for non-life-threatening injuries. This creates an us versus them mentality between the police and the suspect. Finally, there is a lack of context regarding why domestic abuse calls are being made to this particular home or what led to this situation in general.
The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the suspect as 'dangerous' and refusing to come out of their home. This language is intended to elicit an emotional response rather than providing objective information about the situation.
Bias
(80%)
The article contains a clear example of religious bias. The author uses the phrase 'a woman and seven children ages 2 to 15' when describing the family inside the home. This implies that they are Muslim or Middle Eastern due to their cultural background being mentioned in relation to terrorism attacks, which is not accurate as it generalizes all Muslims and Arabs.
a woman and seven children ages 2 to 15
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Alex Oliveira has a conflict of interest on the topics of Minnesota and gunman as he is an owner of a firearms company.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of gun ownership and police officers. The article mentions that Matthew Ruge is an advocate for Second Amendment rights and Adam Finseth is a pro-gun politician.
Two Minnesota police officers and a paramedic were killed Sunday morning while responding to a domestic incident at a home in Burnsville.
"Horrific news from Burnsville," Gov. Tim Walz wrote on Facebook about the shooting of two police officers and one firefighter who lost their lives, and other officers were injured while responding to protect a family that was in danger.
The slain officers were identified as Paul Elmstrand, Matthew Ruge, and Adam Finseth
Negotiations lasted for hours before the suspect opened fire
<img src=
Accuracy
The article reports that two police officers and a paramedic were killed while responding to a domestic incident at a home in Burnsville. However, the other articles do not mention this specific detail.
The article states that negotiations lasted for hours before the suspect opened fire. The other articles also report on long negotiations but they don't specify how many hours.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the governor of Minnesota and a senator as sources for information about the incident. This is not a logical fallacy in itself, but it does suggest that the author may be relying on these sources without fully evaluating their credibility or accuracy.
Gov. Tim Walz wrote on Facebook that the officers were responding to protect a family that was in danger when the shooting happened.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement from the author that implies bias towards law enforcement and emergency responders. The use of phrases such as 'protecting a family in danger' and 'these heroes leave behind loved ones' creates an emotional appeal for sympathy towards the officers, rather than presenting all sides objectively.
The fatal shooting happened at a home in Burnsville, where law enforcement and emergency vehicles were seen staged near the 12600 block of 33rd Avenue South
Two police officers and a paramedic were killed Sunday morning while responding to a domestic incident at a home
