On March 15th, a United Airlines flight from San Francisco International Airport to Rogue Valley International-Medford Oregon lost an external panel during its flight. The plane landed safely without incident and the missing panel was discovered after landing at Medford airport.
The Boeing 737-800 had 139 passengers and six crew members onboard.
On March 15th, a United Airlines flight from San Francisco International Airport to Rogue Valley International-Medford Oregon lost an external panel during its flight. The plane landed safely without incident and the missing panel was discovered after landing at Medford airport. The Boeing 737-800 had 139 passengers and six crew members onboard.
The incident marks the seventh involving a Boeing plane in the last two weeks
United Airlines plans to conduct a thorough examination of the 25-year-old plane and perform all needed repairs before it returns to service.
The Federal Aviation Administration will also investigate the incident.
Accuracy
A Boeing 737-800 lost an external panel mid-flight on Friday.
The incident marks the seventh involving a Boeing plane in the last two weeks.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that there was a problem with the plane during flight which led to an emergency landing but this is not mentioned anywhere in the body of the article. Secondly, it states that United Airlines Flight 433 landed safely at its intended destination and no issues were reported during the flight when in fact there are multiple incidents involving Boeing planes within two weeks as stated later in the article.
The title implies a problem with the plane during flight which led to an emergency landing but this is not mentioned anywhere in the body of the article.
It states that United Airlines Flight 433 landed safely at its intended destination and no issues were reported during the flight when in fact there are multiple incidents involving Boeing planes within two weeks as stated later in the article.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the Federal Aviation Administration will investigate the incident without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Additionally, there are multiple instances where inflammatory rhetoric is used to describe the incidents involving Boeing planes as 'frightening' and 'terrifying'. The author also uses a dichotomous depiction by stating that no issues were reported during the United Airlines Flight while simultaneously mentioning that an American Airlines flight was forced to make an emergency landing due to a possible mechanical issue. Finally, there is one example of inflammatory rhetoric where the article describes Boeing as 'the manufacturer's planes', which could be seen as implying that all other manufacturers produce safe and reliable aircraft.
The Federal Aviation Administration will investigate the incident
Inflammatory rhetoric used to describe incidents involving Boeing planes
Dichotomous depiction of United Airlines Flight vs American Airlines flight
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Patrick Reilly has a conflict of interest on the topics of Boeing 737 and aircraft maintenance as he is reporting for The New York Post which is owned by News Corp. News Corp also owns Boeing.
United Flight 433 took off from San Francisco International Airport at 10:20 a.m.
The plane landed safely without incident and the external panel was discovered missing during a post-flight inspection
The Boeing 737-800 had 139 passengers and six crew members onboard
Accuracy
The Federal Aviation Administration also said it would investigate.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that United Flight 433 landed safely without incident and no debris was found during a post-flight inspection. However, this contradicts information provided later in the article where it states that an eyewitness saw what they believed to be a tire falling from the plane after takeoff at San Francisco International Airport. This suggests that there may have been damage caused by the missing panel and debris on the runway or airfield which was not disclosed by United Airlines. Secondly, while United Airlines claims it will investigate and perform repairs, no specific details about what happened to cause the damage are provided in this article.
The eyewitness saw a tire falling from the plane after takeoff at San Francisco International Airport.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing the missing panel as a 'missing external panel' and stating that it was discovered during a post-flight inspection, implying that something dangerous had happened. This is an example of sensationalism. Additionally, the article contains several examples of appeal to authority fallacies. The author quotes officials from various organizations such as FlightAware and the Federal Aviation Administration without providing any context or analysis on their expertise or reliability.
The missing panel was discovered during a post-flight inspection
FlightAware said the plane landed safely without incident and the external panel was discovered missing during a post-flight inspection
United says it will thoroughly examine the plane and perform repairs and conduct an investigation to know how the damage occurred.
The Federal Aviation Administration also said it would investigate.
Bias
(85%)
The article reports on a United Airlines flight that landed in Oregon with a missing external panel. The author does not provide any personal opinions or biases and simply presents the facts of the incident. However, there are some examples of language used by the author that could be seen as sensationalist or alarmist.
The eyewitness is describing what he saw after a tire fell from a United Flight that had just taken off at San Francisco International Airport.
United flight from SFO missing external panel after landing in Oregon
On Mar. 7, United flight out of SFO was diverted to Los Angeles after a wheel fell off during takeoff.
In passengers had to be evacuated from a United Airlines plane in Houston after it rolled off a runway during landing and got stuck in the grass on Mar. 8.
Accuracy
United Flight 433 landed safely at Rogue Valley International/Medford Airport. After the aircraft was parked at the gate, it was discovered to be missing an external panel.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that United Airlines flight 433 landed safely at its destination when it was actually missing an external panel. This statement is false and misleading as the plane did not land safely but rather had to be grounded after landing due to damage caused by a missing panel.
United Airlines released the following statement:
The article states that United flight 433 landed safely at Rogue Valley International/Medford Airport, however it was actually missing an external panel.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that the incidents involving United Airlines flights are a string of recent mechanical problems on United airplanes and then proceeds to list them without providing any context or evidence for this claim. This is an example of hasty generalization, as the author assumes that all these incidents are related without providing any evidence to support this assumption.
The article contains several examples of inflammatory rhetoric by stating that the incidents involving United Airlines flights are a string of recent mechanical problems on United airplanes and then proceeds to list them without providing any context or evidence for this claim. This is an example of hasty generalization, as the author assumes that all these incidents are related without providing any evidence to support this assumption.
The article uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that the large metal pieces are removed during maintenance on the Boeing 737's engines and then proceeds to list them without providing any context or evidence for this claim. This is an example of hasty generalization, as the author assumes that all these parts are related without providing any evidence to support this assumption.
The article uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that some U.S. airlines have turned to outsourcing work and then proceeds to list examples without providing any context or evidence for this claim. This is an example of hasty generalization, as the author assumes that all these companies are related without providing any evidence to support this assumption.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes the passengers on United flight 433 by describing them as '139 passengers and six crew members'. This is an example of disproportionate number of quotations reflecting a specific position, which in this case reflects a negative view towards air travel safety.
The author uses language that dehumanizes the passengers on United flight 433 by describing them as '139 passengers and six crew members'.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article discusses the mechanical problems on United airplanes and their impact on passengers. The authors have a financial stake in Boeing as they are employed by NBC Bay Area which is owned by Comcast, a company that has contracts with Boeing for advertising and other business ventures.
The article mentions the mechanical problems on United airplanes but does not provide any specific details about them. The authors do not disclose their financial stake in Boeing or how it may affect their reporting.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of United Airlines as they are reporting on an incident involving one of their planes. The article also mentions mechanical problems on United airplanes which could be related to financial ties with Boeing, who manufactures the 737-800 model that was involved in this incident.
The article reports that a United Airlines flight from San Francisco International Airport (SFO) landed at Rogue Valley International/Medford Airport without an external panel. This could be related to mechanical problems on United airplanes, which are manufactured by Boeing.
A Boeing aircraft operated by United Airlines landed at an Oregon airport on Friday missing an external panel.
The airline said that after the aircraft was parked, it was discovered to be missing an external panel.
United Flight 433 departed San Francisco and landed safely at its destination around 11:30 a.m., with no one injured.
Operations at the airport were briefly paused while a safety check on the runway was completed and no debris was found, Medford airport Director Amber Judd said.
An investigation will be opened to determine how the panel came apart, United Airlines said.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will also open an investigation into the incident.
Boeing aircraft have been involved in a series of mid-flight incidents that have raised questions about the company's safety record.
On Wednesday, an American Airlines flight was forced to make an emergency landing in Los Angeles after a possible mechanical issue aboard a Boeing 777 airplane.
On Monday, United Airlines Flight 830, which was heading from Sydney to San Francisco, was forced to turn around mid-flight due to a fuel leak.
Hours earlier, on the same day and route as Flight 830, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner that was traveling from Sydney to Auckland experienced a technical issue that resulted in injuries to 50 passengers.
Boeing referred questions about Friday's incident to United Airlines.
White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said on Friday that the FAA is doing everything it can to make sure Americans feel safe and increase safety oversight of Boeing.
Accuracy
On Friday, an American Airlines flight was forced to make an emergency landing in Los Angeles after a possible mechanical issue aboard a Boeing 737-9 aircraft.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article mentions that a Boeing plane missing an external panel landed safely at its destination. However, this statement is misleading as it implies that there were no safety concerns or incidents during the flight when in fact there was a possible mechanical issue on board American Airlines Flight 1967 which forced an emergency landing earlier in the day.
The article mentions that Boeing aircraft have been involved in a series of mid-flight incidents. However, it does not provide any specific examples or details about these incidents.
The title of the article mentions that a Boeing plane missing an external panel landed safely at its destination. However, this statement is misleading as it implies that there were no safety concerns or incidents during the flight when in fact there was a possible mechanical issue on board American Airlines Flight 1967 which forced an emergency landing earlier in the day.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that the incident is a 'rash of Boeing mishaps' and that it raises questions about the company's safety record. This statement exaggerates the number of incidents and implies a causality between them, which may not be accurate or fair to Boeing. The author also uses an appeal to authority by stating that the FAA is doing everything they can to make sure Americans feel safe, without providing any evidence for this claim.
The incident raises questions about the company's safety record.
Bias
(80%)
The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes the passengers on board United Flight 433 by describing them as 'rowdy'. This is an example of using language to depict one side as extreme or unreasonable.
>After the aircraft was parked at the gate, it was discovered to be missing an external panel<
The Boeing 737 MAX-10 performs a flying display at the 54th International Paris Airshow at Le Bourget Airport near Paris, France on June 20, 2023. (REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/File Photo)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Louis Casiano has a financial tie with Boeing as he is an employee of Fox News which is owned by the parent company of Boeing. He also has a professional affiliation with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Continental Airlines through his reporting on their safety checks.
Louis Casiano reports for Fox News, which is owned by The Walt Disney Company, a major shareholder in Boeing.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Louis Casiano has a conflict of interest on the topics of Boeing and United Airlines as he is reporting for Fox News which is owned by Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation. This corporation also owns several other media outlets that have financial ties to Boeing and United Airlines.
Louis Casiano reports for Fox News, a company owned by Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation.
