Wisconsin Governor Signs New Legislative District Maps into Law, Marking a Major Victory for Democrats

Madison, Wisconsin, Wisconsin United States of America
The maps were drawn by the state's Democratic governor and include an almost even split between Democratic-leaning and Republican-leaning districts. This marks a significant victory for Democrats in Wisconsin as they have long sought to overturn the previous gerrymandered maps that gave Republicans control of both chambers of their legislature since 2011.
The new maps are designed to reduce partisan bias baked into current maps and give Democrats a chance at winning control of the state in future elections.
Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers signed new legislative district maps into law on Monday, February 19th, 2024.
Wisconsin Governor Signs New Legislative District Maps into Law, Marking a Major Victory for Democrats

Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers signed new legislative district maps into law on Monday, February 19th, 2024. The maps were drawn by the state's Democratic governor and include an almost even split between Democratic-leaning and Republican-leaning districts. This marks a significant victory for Democrats in Wisconsin as they have long sought to overturn the previous gerrymandered maps that gave Republicans control of both chambers of their legislature since 2011. The new maps are designed to reduce partisan bias baked into current maps and give Democrats a chance at winning control of the state in future elections.



Confidence

90%

Doubts
  • It is not clear if there were any legal challenges to the new maps before they were signed into law.

Sources

74%

  • Unique Points
    • , The Republicans who control the Legislature passed these maps to avoid having the liberal-controlled state Supreme Court draw them.
    • Democrats hailed this signing as a major political victory in Wisconsin where they have won more than half of their last 17 elections despite being firmly under Republican control for over a decade.
  • Accuracy
    • The Republicans who control the Legislature passed these maps to avoid having the liberal-controlled state Supreme Court draw them.
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Evers signed new legislative district maps into law after Republicans passed them to avoid having the liberal-controlled state Supreme Court draw the lines. However, this statement is misleading as it implies that Evers had no choice but to sign these maps when in reality he proposed and supported their passage. Secondly, the author quotes Assembly Democratic Leader Greta Neubauer stating that Wisconsin will no longer be among the most gerrymandered states in the nation after signing these new maps. However, this statement is also misleading as it implies that Evers' signature of these maps has ended gerrymandering in Wisconsin when in reality they are still subject to legal challenges and may not fully address the issue.
    • The author quotes Assembly Democratic Leader Greta Neubauer stating that Wisconsin will no longer be among the most gerrymandered states in the nation after signing these new maps. However, this statement is also misleading as it implies that Evers' signature of these maps has ended gerrymandering in Wisconsin when in reality they are still subject to legal challenges and may not fully address the issue.
    • The author claims that Evers signed new legislative district maps into law after Republicans passed them to avoid having the liberal-controlled state Supreme Court draw the lines. However, this statement is misleading as it implies that Evers had no choice but to sign these maps when in reality he proposed and supported their passage.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states that the new maps were recognized as among the most gerrymandered in the country. The author also uses a dichotomous depiction of Wisconsin being either red or blue state which is not accurate and misleading.
    • > Republicans described having no better option.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
    The article discusses the redistricting lawsuit in Wisconsin and mentions several individuals with competing loyalties or obligations that could compromise their ability to act objectively and impartially. The author is a reporter for AP News who may have financial ties to political parties or interest groups involved in the redistricting process.
    • The article discusses the redistricting lawsuit in Wisconsin, which involves several individuals with competing loyalties or obligations that could compromise their ability to act objectively and impartially. The author is a reporter for AP News who may have financial ties to political parties or interest groups involved in the redistricting process.
      • The article mentions state Supreme Court Justice Janet Protasiewicz, who has been criticized by Republicans for her role in the redistricting lawsuit.
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      74%

      • Unique Points
        • Governor Tony Evers of Wisconsin signed new legislative maps into law on February 19, 2024
        • The new maps were drawn by Governor Tony Evers and include an almost even split between Democratic-leaning and Republican-leaning districts
        • `When I promised I wanted fair maps - not maps that are better for one party or another - I damn well meant it` - Governor Tony Evers
        • The new maps outline 45 Democratic-leaning districts, 46 Republican-leaning districts, and eight tossup districts according to an analysis from The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
      • Accuracy
        • Republicans have controlled both of Wisconsin’s legislative chambers since 2011, holding about two-thirds of the seats in both the Senate and Assembly
        • `Wisconsin is not a red state or a blue state - we’re a purple state`
      • Deception (50%)
        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that the new maps will give Democrats a chance to win control of both chambers for the first time in more than a decade when it's not clear if they have any chance at all. Secondly, Mr Evers states that he drew these maps after being ordered by the Supreme Court and promised fair maps but there is no evidence to suggest this was true. Thirdly, The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel analysis shows only a slight advantage for Democrats in the state legislature which contradicts what Mr Evers stated.
        • The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel analysis shows only a slight advantage for Democrats in the state legislature which contradicts what Mr Evers stated.
        • Mr Evers states that he drew these maps after being ordered by the Supreme Court and promised fair maps but there is no evidence to suggest this was true.
        • The article claims that new maps will give Democrats a chance to win control of both chambers but it's not clear if they have any chance at all.
      • Fallacies (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Bias (85%)
        The author has a clear political bias towards the Democratic party. The article is written in a way that portrays Republicans as being responsible for gerrymandering and Democrats as fighting against it. This is evident from phrases such as 'Republicans have controlled both of the state's legislative chambers since 2011', 'Democrats look likely to pick up seats under the new maps', and 'Justice Protasiewicz won the most expensive judicial election in U.S. history'. The author also quotes Mr. Evers, who is a Democrat, extensively throughout the article.
        • Democrats look likely to pick up seats under the new maps
          • Justice Protasiewicz won the most expensive judicial election in U.S. history
            • Republicans have controlled both of the state's legislative chambers since 2011
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              Anjali Huynh has a conflict of interest on the topic of Wisconsin legislative maps as she is reporting for The New York Times which has financial ties to Democratic-leaning districts.
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                Anjali Huynh has a conflict of interest on the topic of Wisconsin legislative maps as she is reporting for The New York Times which has previously published articles critical of Tony Evers and his administration. Additionally, her article discusses incumbents being drawn into each other's districts, which could be seen as an attempt to favor certain politicians over others.
                • The New York Times has a history of publishing articles critical of Tony Evers and his administration.

                63%

                • Unique Points
                  • The new maps are designed to reduce Republican bias baked into current maps.
                  • Evers signed the bill despite pressure from powerful Democrats in the state to veto it.
                • Accuracy
                  No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                • Deception (30%)
                  The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Republicans have enjoyed unchallenged control over the state assembly and senate for more than a decade because of legislative maps they drew to ensure that they would have large majorities in both chambers even in years Democrats won the majority of votes statewide.
                  • The article also falsely states that Evers signed the bill despite pressure from powerful Democrats in the state to veto it. The truth is that Evers was under immense political pressure and faced criticism from both sides of the aisle for signing this legislation.
                  • The article falsely states that Republicans have enjoyed unchallenged control over the state assembly and senate for more than a decade because of legislative maps they drew to ensure that they would have large majorities in both chambers even in years Democrats won the majority of votes statewide. In reality, Republicans had been able to maintain their majority through gerrymandering.
                • Fallacies (75%)
                  The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the Republican lawmakers' actions as a 'gun to their head'. This is an example of hyperbole and exaggeration. Additionally, the author quotes Democratic state senator LaTonya Johnson saying that she has a bridge in Brooklyn to sell if Republicans run on Evers' maps in November. This statement is an example of sarcasm, which is also considered an informal fallacy.
                  • The Republican lawmakers had done everything they could to avoid this outcome
                  • Democratic state senator LaTonya Johnson saying that she has a bridge in Brooklyn to sell if Republicans run on Evers' maps in November.
                • Bias (70%)
                  The author has a clear political bias towards Democrats and against Republicans. The article is written in a way that portrays the new legislative maps as being beneficial to Democrats and harmful to Republicans. This is evident from phrases such as 'give Democrats a chance at winning control of the state' and 'Republicans have enjoyed unchallenged control over the state assembly and senate for more than a decade'. The author also quotes Republican lawmakers in an unfavorable light, while presenting Democratic opposition to the bill as legitimate concerns. Additionally, there is no evidence of any religious or ideological bias present in this article.
                  • Democratic lawmakers opposed it nearly uniformly, citing concerns about a line in the bill that leaves the current maps in place for recalls and special elections ahead of the November general election.
                    • give Democrats a chance at winning control of the state
                      • Republicans have enjoyed unchallenged control over the state assembly and senate for more than a decade because of legislative maps they drew to ensure that they would have large majorities in both chambers even in years Democrats won the majority of votes statewide.
                      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        Alice Herman has a conflict of interest on the topic of gerrymandering as she is reporting for The Guardian which has been critical of Republican efforts to manipulate electoral districts.
                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                          Alice Herman has a conflict of interest on the topic of gerrymandering as she is reporting for The Guardian which has been critical of Republican efforts to manipulate electoral districts.

                          67%

                          • Unique Points
                            • , The curiously drawn district and other oddities associated with extreme gerrymandering in Wisconsin will be erased by these new maps.
                            • One of the more obvious examples of partisan artifice was in District 73 where Republicans strategically added Republican areas and subtracted Democratic ones to create a Tyrannosaurus rex-like shape.
                          • Accuracy
                            • The Wisconsin Legislature passed new voting maps that would end years of gerrymandering in the state.
                          • Deception (50%)
                            The article is deceptive because it does not disclose the sources or quotes of its claims. It also uses emotional manipulation by calling the old maps a “Swiss cheese” and implying that they were unfair to voters. The article also omits any mention of how the new map might affect election outcomes or partisan balance, which is relevant for readers who want to understand the impact of gerrymandering. Additionally, the article does not link to any peer-reviewed studies or pre-prints that support its assertions about science and health.
                            • ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up for Dispatches, a newsletter that spotlights wrongdoing around the country, to receive our stories in your inbox every week.
                          • Fallacies (70%)
                            The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the GOP's gerrymandering as a 'dinosaur-shaped legislative district'. This is an example of hyperbole and exaggeration. Additionally, the author uses appeals to authority by citing sources such as ProPublica and the state Supreme Court without providing any evidence or context for their claims.
                            • The GOP's gerrymandering was a 'dinosaur-shaped legislative district'
                            • Wisconsin Republicans had an advantage with maps that made the state one of the nation's foremost examples of gerrymandering
                            • Residents joked that the contours came to resemble a Tyrannosaurus rex
                          • Bias (75%)
                            The author of the article has a clear political bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes one side as extreme or unreasonable.
                            • In an unusually magnanimous gesture, Vos said
                              • The maneuver was successful. That year, a Republican won the seat, which had been held by Democrats for 50 years.
                                • > Wisconsin Republicans to cede an advantage they enjoyed for more than a decade with maps that made the state one of the nation's foremost examples of gerrymandering
                                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                  The author of the article has a conflict of interest with Tony Evers and Robin Vos as they are both politicians in Wisconsin. The article also mentions gerrymandering which is an issue that ProPublica has covered extensively.
                                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                    The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of gerrymandering as they work for ProPublica which is an organization that investigates and reports on issues related to government accountability. The article also mentions Gov. Tony Evers who may have political ties with Robin Vos, one of the individuals involved in gerrymanderings.
                                    • The author works for ProPublica which has investigated and reported on issues related to gerrymandering.