Wisconsin Supreme Court Allows Secure Ballot Drop Boxes for 2024 Election

Madison, Wisconsin, Wisconsin United States of America
Liberal majority overturned previous decision banning most drop boxes
Municipal clerks may utilize secure drop boxes as an option for voters to return absentee ballots
Republican Party pushing for stricter voting laws, Democrats advocating for expanded access to voting options
Use of drop boxes became contentious issue during 2020 election, with no evidence of widespread voter fraud in Wisconsin
Wisconsin Supreme Court allows secure ballot drop boxes for 2024 election
Wisconsin Supreme Court Allows Secure Ballot Drop Boxes for 2024 Election

In a significant ruling for the upcoming 2024 presidential election, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has overturned a previous decision that banned most ballot drop boxes in the state. The court's liberal majority ruled that municipal clerks may lawfully utilize secure drop boxes as an option for voters to return their absentee ballots.

The use of ballot drop boxes became a contentious issue during the 2020 election, with Democrats widely encouraging their use due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Former President Donald Trump and his allies falsely claimed that the use of drop boxes led to widespread voter fraud, but there is no evidence suggesting that fraud or abuse occurred in Wisconsin.

The ruling comes as both major parties are gearing up for the November election. The Republican Party has been pushing for stricter voting laws, while Democrats have advocated for expanded access to voting options. The GOP-controlled state Legislature had previously attempted to ban drop boxes altogether, but that effort was blocked by the courts.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission has encouraged municipalities to set up drop boxes in secure locations and to follow strict guidelines for their use. Priorities USA, a liberal advocacy group, had challenged the previous ruling that banned most drop boxes and welcomed Friday's decision.

The court's decision is expected to have a significant impact on the 2024 presidential election in Wisconsin, which is considered a crucial battleground state. The use of drop boxes could make it easier for voters to cast their ballots, particularly those who may have difficulty getting to the polls on Election Day.

The ruling was met with criticism from some conservatives, who argued that the court was overstepping its bounds and politicizing the judiciary. However, supporters of the decision hailed it as a victory for democracy and access to fair and secure elections.



Confidence

95%

Doubts
  • Are there any specific security measures in place for these drop boxes?
  • Is there a risk of voter fraud with the use of drop boxes?

Sources

99%

  • Unique Points
    • The Wisconsin Supreme Court's liberal majority ruled that ballot drop boxes can be used widely in the state again.
    • Drop boxes were banned from use in Wisconsin two years ago by the court’s conservative majority.
    • Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, a liberal, wrote for the four-justice majority that clerks may lawfully utilize secure drop boxes in an exercise of their statutorily conferred discretion.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

96%

  • Unique Points
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court overturned a ruling from less than 2 years ago that banned most ballot drop boxes
    • Democrats widely encouraged voters to use drop boxes during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 and are expected to do so again this fall
    • Former President Donald Trump and his allies falsely claimed that the use of drop boxes led to widespread voter fraud in 2020, but there is no evidence suggesting that fraud or abuse occurred in the use of drop boxes during the 2020 election in Wisconsin
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (90%)
    The article does not contain any explicit logical fallacies. However, there are several instances of inflammatory rhetoric used to describe the actions and beliefs of various political groups. These include 'widely encouraged their voters to use the drop boxes' for Democrats and 'continued to falsely claim that their use is tied to widespread voter fraud' for Republicans. While these statements may be factually accurate, they are still inflammatory in nature and can be seen as attempting to stir up emotions rather than presenting objective information.
    • ][The Wisconsin Supreme Court] had repeatedly criticized the court for taking up the case anew so soon after it had been decided, claiming that the doctrine of ‘stare decisis’ – the judicial concept that judges should broadly respect legal precedents when formulating and writing opinions – should be relied on. But liberal justices on the court explicitly rejected those claims during oral arguments, pointing specifically to the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in 2022 to overturn Roe v. Wade, which had for decades provided a federal right to abortion.[/
  • Bias (95%)
    The article does not demonstrate any clear bias towards a specific political party or ideology. However, it does use language that depicts Republicans as falsely claiming that drop boxes lead to widespread voter fraud and encourages readers to view their shift in attitude towards drop boxes as a recent development. This could be seen as implying that Republicans have historically held an extreme or unreasonable position on the issue of ballot drop boxes.
    • But, in recent months, an ongoing shift in attitudes toward early and alternative voting methods has emerged within the GOP nationally – including by Trump himself, who has begun softening his stance.
      • However, it does use language that depicts Republicans as falsely claiming that drop boxes lead to widespread voter fraud.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      100%

      • Unique Points
        • The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that absentee drop boxes can be used ahead of the November election.
        • The decision reverses a previous 2022 ruling.
        • In a 4-3 decision, the court argued that ballots can be dropped off at election offices or at absentee drop boxes set up by the municipal clerk in locations other than the office.
      • Accuracy
        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      100%

      • Unique Points
        • Liberals gained majority on Wisconsin Supreme Court in April 2021.
        • Ballot drop boxes were used extensively during the 2020 presidential election due to COVID-19 pandemic.
        • Friday’s ruling overturned the February 2022 decision and returned Priorities USA’s case to the trial judge for further proceedings.
        • Drop boxes provide a secure and convenient way for voters to return ballots.
        • Control of Wisconsin Supreme Court will be up for grabs in April 2023 as a liberal justice is not seeking reelection.
        • The court is expected to decide on the legality of abortions in Wisconsin following two cases filed by Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin and a trial court judge’s ruling that parts of the 2011 labor law violate the state constitution.
      • Accuracy
        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication