Priscilla Alvarez

Priscilla Alvarez White House Reporter Priscilla Alvarez is a White House reporter for CNN. Latest i joined CNN in January 2019 as a reporter covering immigration politics and policy, traveling across the country and on the border to provide first-hand accounts on the ground. She's broken dozens of stories, including on the 2021 surge of unaccompanied migrant children at the US southern border and on immigration policy changes. She was also nominated for an Emmy for the CNN team's coverage of Haitian migrants converging at the border. She's fluent in Spanish, grew up in Leesburg, Virginia, and briefly lived in Panama. She graduated from Virginia Tech where she majored in journalism and world politics and policy. She's currently based in Washington, D.C., where she's on the board of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists DC chapter.

76%

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

85%

Examples:

  • The author appears to have a pro-Trump bias by using the term 'claims' instead of providing evidence for his statement about migrants being flown in from unknown parts. She also cites sources that support curbing immigration and implies that CBP approved secretive flights, which are not accurate.
  • The author has a neutral bias by reporting on the Texas judge's ruling that allows them to continue with their border wall plan.
  • The author seems to have a pro-Biden bias by focusing on the pressure he is facing regarding border crossings and quoting Blinken and Mayorkas as they press Mexico to reduce migrant flows. She also does not provide any context or evidence for Trump's claim about 325,000 migrants being flown in from unknown parts.

Conflicts of Interest

50%

Examples:

  • However, she may benefit from increased traffic and visibility by covering immigration politics and policy for CNN.
  • The author does not have any apparent conflicts of interest.

Contradictions

100%

Examples:

  • There are no contradictions found in this article.
  • This statement is contradicted by the fact that there were parole programs and other legal avenues for migrants to enter the US before Title 42 was implemented.

Deceptions

90%

Examples:

  • This article is deceptive because it claims that Trump made a statement about migrants being flown into the US from unknown parts without providing any context or evidence to support this claim. This implies that there was some sort of secret program involved when in fact CBP did not facilitate these flights and the information obtained through a FOIA lawsuit is public.
  • This article is deceptive because it misrepresents information obtained through a FOIA lawsuit by stating that CBP approved secretive flights and omitting important details such as who was being flown within or to the United States. This implies that there was some sort of clandestine operation involved when in fact migrants who flew into the US were allowed entry and thoroughly vetted through CBP One.
  • This article is deceptive because it misrepresents parole programs by stating that they are secretive when in fact they are publicly available and require sponsors in the US. This implies that there was some sort of hidden program involved when in fact these processes have been used before and keep people from migrating irregularly.

Recent Articles

Kamala Harris Rallies Democratic Party After Biden's Disappointing Debate Performance

Kamala Harris Rallies Democratic Party After Biden's Disappointing Debate Performance

Broke On: Friday, 28 June 2024 Vice President Kamala Harris rallies Democratic officials and emphasizes contrast between Biden and Trump after disappointing debate performance, while some discuss potential replacement of Biden on ticket.
Biden Administration Halts U.S.-Made Ammunition Shipment to Israel Amidst Rafah Invasion Concerns

Biden Administration Halts U.S.-Made Ammunition Shipment to Israel Amidst Rafah Invasion Concerns

Broke On: Sunday, 05 May 2024 The Biden administration has halted a U.S.-made ammunition shipment to Israel, marking the first such action since the October attack. The White House declined to comment on why the shipment was stopped, but concerns over an Israeli invasion of Rafah in Gaza have been raised. Prime Minister Netanyahu intends to order an invasion regardless of a ceasefire or hostage release deal, potentially damaging U.S.-Israel relations.
Biden Administration's Secretive Flights Bringing 320,000 Migrants to US Airports Allegedly Create Law Enforcement Vulnerabilities Too Grave to Release Publicly

Biden Administration's Secretive Flights Bringing 320,000 Migrants to US Airports Allegedly Create Law Enforcement Vulnerabilities Too Grave to Release Publicly

Broke On: Thursday, 07 March 2024 The Biden administration's secretive flights of migrants to US airports have raised security concerns and exposed loopholes in the border process. CIS obtained data showing that 320,000 inadmissible aliens were flown to select locations last year under parole programs for designated countries. Migrants received entry and vetting through a mobile app.
Biden Meets With Mexican President About Surge in Migration at the Border

Biden Meets With Mexican President About Surge in Migration at the Border

Broke On: Thursday, 28 December 2023 Biden administration met with Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador discussed unprecedented irregular migration in the Western Hemisphere identified ways Mexico and the United States will address border security challenges White House said President Biden spoke to López Obrador about ongoing efforts to manage migratory flows in the Western Hemisphere

Texas Allowed to Continue Razor Wire Installation at U.S.-Mexico Border

Broke On: Monday, 30 October 2023 A federal judge in Texas has ruled in favor of the state, allowing it to continue installing razor wire along the U.S.-Mexico border. The Biden administration had sought to halt the installation, arguing that it was a federal responsibility. The judge's ruling found that the federal government had not provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the state's actions were causing irreparable harm.