Devlin Barrett,
Devlin Barrett is a reporter for The Washington Post, focusing on national security and law enforcement. He has won multiple Pulitzer Prizes and has over 20 years of experience covering federal law enforcement. Barrett has worked at The Wall Street Journal, The Associated Press, and the New York Post. His reporting often examines the actions of government agencies and their impact on national security.
90%
The Daily's Verdict
This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.
Bias
95%
Examples:
- Devlin Barrett has a strong focus on national security and law enforcement, which is evident in his reporting. He has won multiple Pulitzer Prizes and has over 20 years of experience covering federal law enforcement.
- There are no instances of significant bias in Barrett's reporting, but his focus on national security may lead to a more critical analysis of actions taken by government agencies.
Conflicts of Interest
95%
Examples:
- Barrett has worked for major news organizations like The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and The Associated Press. There are no instances of conflicts of interest in his reporting.
- However, his focus on national security and law enforcement may lead to potential conflicts of interest that are not always addressed in his articles.
Contradictions
85%
Examples:
- However, there are instances where Barrett does not thoroughly examine contradictions or conflicts of interest, such as in the article about the hush money case against Trump.
- In some articles, Barrett highlights contradictions in the evidence or actions taken by government agencies. For example, he notes that agents deliberately timed their search of Trump's Mar-a-Lago property in August 2022 when he was not there, contrary to Trump's claims.
Deceptions
80%
Examples:
- However, there are instances where Barrett's reporting may be misleading or inaccurate. For example, he implies that evidence was unfairly withheld by federal prosecutors in New York in the trial of Donald Trump on charges related to hush money payments.
- In some articles, Barrett highlights deceptive practices used by individuals or organizations. For example, he notes that Trump's defense team argued that the Presidential Records Act took priority over the Espionage Act when it came to highly classified documents.
Recent Articles
Former President Trump Survives Assassination Attempt: Investigating the Security Lapses at His Pennsylvania Rally
Broke On: Tuesday, 30 July 2024On July 13, 2024, during a campaign rally in Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump survived an assassination attempt. The Secret Service and FBI launched investigations to determine the cause and culprit of the security lapse that allowed a shooter to fire towards Trump from a nearby rooftop. Parents of Allegheny County Man Reported Missing Before He Attempted to Assassinate Former President Trump
Broke On: Thursday, 18 July 2024Thomas Matthew Crooks, a Bethel Park High School alumnus and former community college student, attempted to assassinate former President Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania rally in 2024. His parents had contacted authorities expressing concern for his welfare prior to the attack. The FBI is investigating Crooks' motive and scrutiny has fallen on the Secret Service for their security measures at the event. Crooks managed to bypass them and get close enough to Trump with an AR-style rifle belonging to his father. 
Mystery Surrounds Motive of Man Who Gained Rooftop Access and Wounded Former President Trump with an AR-Style Rifle
Broke On: Tuesday, 16 July 2024Former President Trump survived an assassination attempt at a Pennsylvania rally in July 2024. Suspect Thomas Matthew Crooks, described as quiet and intelligent, gained roof access and shot Trump with an AR-style rifle. Motive unclear despite extensive investigation. 
Supreme Court Decision on Trump's Immunity: Implications for Ongoing Criminal Trials
Broke On: Monday, 01 July 2024The US Supreme Court is set to rule on former President Trump's presidential immunity claim, which could impact ongoing criminal trials against him. Trump faces charges in Florida for keeping government documents and in New York for falsifying business records. The court's decision, expected July 1, may reject his broad immunity claim but leave conditions that could lead to further legal issues. 
Judge Aileen Cannon Presides Over Hearings in Donald Trump's Criminal Case: Budget Controversy and Disqualification Arguments
Broke On: Monday, 24 June 2024Former President Donald Trump's legal team challenged the legality of Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment and budget during a hearing on June 24, 2024, over his investigation into Trump's mishandling of classified documents. Judge Aileen Cannon questioned the Justice Department about past special counsel appointments and their funding while addressing arguments regarding Trump's disqualification of Smith. The controversy surrounding Trump's handling of classified documents continues as he faces criminal charges and is the presumptive GOP nominee for 2024. 
Historic Criminal Trials: Juries to Begin Deliberations Against Former President Trump in Manhattan and Stormy Daniels Cases
Broke On: Wednesday, 29 May 2024Two juries will begin deliberations this week in historic criminal trials against former U.S. President Donald Trump, with the first trial focusing on falsifying business records related to hush money payments and the second on his involvement with Stormy Daniels. 
Former President Trump's Hush Money Trial: Cohen's Testimony and Missing Witnesses
Broke On: Saturday, 18 May 2024Former President Donald Trump stands trial for orchestrating hush money payments to conceal sex scandals during the 2016 election. Michael Cohen, a former lawyer, testified about Trump's involvement and falsified business records. Despite defense attempts to discredit Cohen, legal experts believe the prosecution holds an advantage due to circumstantial evidence and favorable laws. The trial marks the first criminal case against a U.S. president and could impact Trump's political future. 
New Revelations in Trump Hush-Money Cases: Cohen, Davidson, and the Role of the Trump Organization
Broke On: Friday, 03 May 2024New revelations emerge from ongoing criminal trials regarding hush-money deals involving Donald Trump during his 2016 presidential campaign. Michael Cohen and Keith Davidson, key figures in these deals, have been under scrutiny. A secret recording between Trump and Cohen revealed discussions about facilitating a payment to Karen McDougal, with Trump speaking to Allen Weisselberg about setting up a company for the transaction. Davidson testified that hush money deals may have helped Trump win the election and exchanged texts regarding 'funds received'. The trials continue with impartial reporting on all facts. Supreme Court Argues Over Trump's Immunity from Prosecution for Alleged Election Interference
Broke On: Thursday, 25 April 2024The Supreme Court is debating whether former President Trump can be prosecuted for his role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election results. The Justice Department argues against immunity, while Trump's lawyers claim absolute immunity. The trial could take months and impact the November presidential election timeline. Implications for future investigations of former presidents hang in the balance. 
Federal Judge Rejects Trump's Bid to Dismiss Classified Documents Prosecution
Broke On: Friday, 05 April 2024On April 4th, 2024, a federal judge denied Donald Trump's bid to dismiss the classified documents prosecution against him. The Presidential Records Act was cited by lawyers for Trump as a defense argument but it was rejected by prosecutors on special counsel Jack Smith's team. Judge Aileen Cannon defended her handling of the issue and shot down Trump's claim that the PRA took priority over the Espionage Act when it came to highly classified documents.
