John Fritze

John Fritze is a seasoned journalist with extensive experience covering the White House, the Supreme Court, and various branches of government for reputable publications such as USA TODAY, The Baltimore Sun, and The Indianapolis Star. He has broken important stories on major issues such as the overturning of Roe v. Wade and the administration's approach to the nation's opioid crisis. Based in Washington, D.C., Fritze is currently a reporter covering the Supreme Court for CNN.

93%

The Daily's Verdict

This author is known for its high journalistic standards. The author strives to maintain neutrality and transparency in its reporting, and avoids conflicts of interest. The author has a reputation for accuracy and rarely gets contradicted on major discrepancies in its reporting.

Bias

100%

Examples:

  • The author has a strong bias towards providing unbiased reporting on the Supreme Court. This is evident in the fact that no examples of biased reporting are provided in any of the articles.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

  • There are no conflicts of interest found in any of the articles provided.

Contradictions

85%

Examples:

  • However, these instances are few and far between.
  • There are some contradictions found in the articles, such as conflicting information about whether Justice Alito's wife was solely responsible for the flags outside their home and discrepancies in the timeline of events regarding the upside-down American flag.

Deceptions

80%

Examples:

  • There are some instances where deceptive practices may have occurred, such as the upside-down American flag incident and Justice Alito's position on recusal from cases involving the January 6 attack on the US Capitol. However, these instances are few and far between.

Recent Articles

Supreme Court Ruling on Corner Post vs. Fed: Plaintiffs Can Challenge Regulations After Being Adversely Affected

Supreme Court Ruling on Corner Post vs. Fed: Plaintiffs Can Challenge Regulations After Being Adversely Affected

Broke On: Monday, 01 July 2024 The Supreme Court ruled in favor of North Dakota's Corner Post truck stop, challenging the Federal Reserve's regulation on debit-card swipe fees. The decision has implications for government regulations and could lead to an increase in regulatory challenges. The court held that a plaintiff's injury is an essential element in determining when the clock starts running for the statute of limitations under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). This ruling sets a precedent for challenging other regulations under the APA and comes amidst growing concerns about the size and power of administrative agencies.
Supreme Court to Rule on Trump's Immunity from Criminal Prosecution for 2020 Election Actions on July 1, 2024

Supreme Court to Rule on Trump's Immunity from Criminal Prosecution for 2020 Election Actions on July 1, 2024

Broke On: Monday, 01 July 2024 The Supreme Court is poised to rule on Donald Trump's immunity from criminal prosecution for his actions regarding the 2020 election on July 1, 2024. Trump faces a four-count indictment in Georgia over attempts to overturn election results and obstruct Congress certification. The court may set a new test for determining which official acts receive immunity, potentially delaying the trial further.
Steve Bannon to Report to Prison for Contempt of Congress as Supreme Court Rejects His Appeal

Steve Bannon to Report to Prison for Contempt of Congress as Supreme Court Rejects His Appeal

Broke On: Friday, 28 June 2024 Former Trump aide Steve Bannon, who was convicted of contempt of Congress for defying a subpoena related to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot investigation, begins serving his four-month prison sentence on July 1 after the Supreme Court denies his appeal. Bannon argued for executive privilege but was rejected by both lower courts and the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court Overturns Chevron Precedent, Weakening Federal Agency Regulatory Power

Supreme Court Overturns Chevron Precedent, Weakening Federal Agency Regulatory Power

Broke On: Friday, 28 June 2024 In a landmark decision on June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court overturned the Chevron precedent from 1984, weakening federal agencies' power to approve regulations. The ruling shifts balance of power towards judicial branch and could impact various aspects of American life. Critics argue it restores rule-of-law values and limits regulatory authority, but opponents warn about potential uncertainty and instability.
Supreme Court Upholds Gun Ban for Domestic Violence Restraining Order Cases: A Landmark Decision for Victim Safety

Supreme Court Upholds Gun Ban for Domestic Violence Restraining Order Cases: A Landmark Decision for Victim Safety

Broke On: Friday, 21 June 2024 The Supreme Court upheld a federal law that bans guns for individuals under domestic violence restraining orders, marking the first major test of its 2022 gun rights ruling. In the case U.S. v. Rahimi, Chief Justice John Roberts affirmed historical practices and previous firearm laws to limit access to firearms for those who pose a credible threat to intimate partners.
Neighbor Dispute: Timeline of Events Surrounding Upside-Down American Flag Incident at Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito's Home

Neighbor Dispute: Timeline of Events Surrounding Upside-Down American Flag Incident at Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito's Home

Broke On: Monday, 15 February 2021 Neighbor dispute leads to controversy over timeline of events and accuracy of statements regarding Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito flying an upside-down American flag in Fairfax County, Virginia. Conflicting accounts exist regarding the cause and timing of the incident.
Justice Alito's Controversial Flags: A Test of Ethics and Transparency at the Supreme Court

Justice Alito's Controversial Flags: A Test of Ethics and Transparency at the Supreme Court

Broke On: Thursday, 30 May 2024 Chief Justice Roberts declined a meeting request from Democratic lawmakers regarding flags at Justice Alito's properties, associated with Trump supporters and the Capitol riot. Alito claimed ignorance of their meaning and refused to recuse from related cases. The controversy highlights the need for transparency and ethics reform in the Supreme Court as it weighs cases tied to the 2020 election and January 6 riot.
Justice Alito's Controversial Flags: A Test of Ethics and Transparency at the Supreme Court

Justice Alito's Controversial Flags: A Test of Ethics and Transparency at the Supreme Court

Broke On: Thursday, 30 May 2024 Chief Justice Roberts declined a meeting request from Democratic lawmakers regarding flags at Justice Alito's properties, associated with Trump supporters and the Capitol riot. Alito claimed ignorance of their meaning and refused to recuse from related cases. The controversy highlights the need for transparency and ethics reform in the Supreme Court as it weighs cases tied to the 2020 election and January 6 riot.
Supreme Court Justice Alito Faces Calls for Recusal Over Unauthorized Flags at His Homes

Supreme Court Justice Alito Faces Calls for Recusal Over Unauthorized Flags at His Homes

Broke On: Friday, 15 January 2021 Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito faces recusal calls over flags at his homes, including an upside-down American flag in Alexandria, Virginia, raised without his knowledge.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Defends Himself Amidst Controversies Over Undisclosed Gifts and Wife's Efforts to Overturn 2020 Election Results

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Defends Himself Amidst Controversies Over Undisclosed Gifts and Wife's Efforts to Overturn 2020 Election Results

Broke On: Friday, 10 May 2024 Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, Virginia 'Ginni' Thomas, faced criticism for undisclosed lavish trips from wealthy conservatives and Ginni's attempts to overturn the 2020 election results. Despite controversies surrounding their involvement in 2020 election cases and ethics concerns, they have not recused themselves.