Giuliana Grossi

Giuliana Grossi is a seasoned journalist with a focus on healthcare. She has written extensively on topics related to health equity, access, and disparities. Her articles often highlight the systemic issues that contribute to unequal healthcare outcomes and explore potential solutions for these problems. Giuliana's work is informed by her background in journalism and her deep understanding of the complexities of the US healthcare system.

Biography:  https://www.ajmc.com/authors/giuliana-grossi

16%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a poor reputation for journalistic standards and is not considered a reliable news source.

Bias

10%

Examples:

  • Giuliana Grossi frequently reports on instances where industry influencers or government agencies may have acted in a manner detrimental to public health or equity.
  • Giuliana Grossi's articles often highlight disparities in healthcare access and outcomes, particularly for marginalized populations such as women, individuals with mental health conditions, and members of the LGBTQIA+ community.

Conflicts of Interest

10%

Examples:

  • Giuliana Grossi's articles often discuss the potential conflicts of interest that may arise in healthcare settings, such as the influence of pharmaceutical companies on prescribing practices or the impact of financial ties on research outcomes.

Contradictions

90%

Examples:

  • Despite the Commonwealth Fund scorecard ranking Mississippi, Texas, Nevada, and Oklahoma among the poorest-performing states for women's health care access, quality, and outcomes, Massachusetts, Vermont, and Rhode Island rank at the top.
  • The report reveals disparities in women's health and reproductive care across the United States. However, it does not specifically address how these disparities may impact individual patients or communities.

Deceptions

0%

Examples:

  • There are no instances of deceptive practices or false information in Giuliana Grossi's reporting.

Recent Articles

Strict Abortion Policies Lead to Worse Health Outcomes for Women in the Southeastern US: A Report by The Commonwealth Fund

Strict Abortion Policies Lead to Worse Health Outcomes for Women in the Southeastern US: A Report by The Commonwealth Fund

Broke On: Thursday, 18 July 2024 The 2022 Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade led to worsening women's health outcomes in states with restrictive abortion policies, particularly in the Southeastern US. These areas experienced decreased access to OB/GYNs, higher uninsured rates, and increased preventable deaths. Mississippi ranked lowest for women's health due to strict abortion laws and lack of services. Expanding Medicaid coverage could help improve outcomes.