News Medical Net
News Medical Net is a trusted source of medical and life sciences information. The site covers the latest innovations in healthcare, research, and technology with articles written by experts in various fields. The site also features exclusive interviews with Nobel Prize-winning laureates and an encyclopedic library of health and life sciences articles written by the in-house team of biomedical professionals.
83%
The Daily's Verdict
This news site has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on its reporting.
Bias
85%
Examples:
- Additionally, there is a tendency to present environmental and psycho-social factors as contributing to the development of PASC when there is no evidence supporting this claim.
- There are also instances where the author misrepresents the findings of studies or implies that all studies agree on the same number when they do not.
- The site tends to present information in a balanced and accurate manner. However, there are instances where the author's opinion is presented as fact without sufficient evidence.
Conflicts of Interest
85%
Examples:
- For example, in the article titled 'Long COVID in children: A closer look reveals lasting impacts', the author implies that environmental and psycho-social factors contribute to the development of PASC when there is no evidence supporting this claim.
- Similarly, in the article titled 'Does closing the toilet lid before flushing prevent viral contamination?', there is no evidence presented to support the claim that closing the toilet lid before flushing prevents viral contamination.
- There are instances where the author's opinion is presented as fact without sufficient evidence.
Contradictions
85%
Examples:
- For example, the article states that only 12,947 out of 15% of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections progress to PASC but then states that 12% of infected individuals reported deterioration.
- Similarly, the article states that among infected individuals, 12% reported deterioration but then says that only 12% of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections progress to PASC.
- There are instances where contradictions are not highlighted or addressed.
- There is also a contradiction regarding the prevalence of PASC among children where studies have consistently reported a range between 4% and 62% but the author implies that all studies agree on the same number.
Deceptions
80%
Examples:
- For example, in the article titled 'COVID-19 linked to long-lasting cognitive deficits, study finds', the author states that only 15% of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections progress to PASC while research has shown it to be much higher.
- Similarly, in the article titled 'Long COVID in children: A closer look reveals lasting impacts', the author implies that all studies agree on the same number of prevalence of PASC among children when studies have consistently reported a range between 4% and 62%.
- There are instances where deceptive practices are used to mislead readers.