The American Prospect
The American Prospect is an independent voice for liberal thought, providing informed discussion on public policy from a progressive perspective. The news site focuses on promoting narrative, journalistic approaches to complex issues and challenging conventional wisdom. It covers topics such as politics, policy alternatives and the necessary steps to create good legislation. The site is known for dispeling myths and expanding the dialogue while reporting on whistleblower laws, union elections in automobile industries, and other relevant news stories.
76%
The Daily's Verdict
This news site has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on its reporting.
Bias
85%
Examples:
- I suspect politics did play a role here.
- It's hard to guess why so many Trump critics didn't like this case.
- Yet it turned out that the Bragg case was solid.
Conflicts of Interest
80%
Examples:
- At Mercedes, at Hyundai and at hundreds of other companies, Alabama workers have made billions of dollars for executives and shareholders, but we haven't gotten our fair share.
- The results at Volkswagen and Mercedes will be a key test for the UAW's bid to translate the momentum of its landmark strike at the Big Three automakers into new organizing.
Contradictions
75%
Examples:
- A large portion of a Dreamliner's fuselage went missing without a trace in the MRSA area.
- Sections 47 and 48 of a Boeing Dreamliner fuselage went missing from the Material Review Segregation Area (MRSA) of the Charleston, South Carolina, 787 assembly plant around 2015.
Deceptions
60%
Examples:
- The author uses selective reporting by only mentioning two examples of organizing efforts at Mercedes and Volkswagen while ignoring other instances where similar efforts have failed or fizzled before coming to a vote.
- The author uses sensationalism by stating that workers at Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen are going to 'turn things around' with their union elections. This statement implies that there has been a significant negative impact on workers at these companies which is not supported by any evidence presented in the article.